| Location: | Federal |
|---|---|
| Posted: | Jul 17, 2026 |
| Due: | Jul 1, 2026 |
| Agency: | DEPT OF DEFENSE |
| Type of Government: | Federal |
| Category: |
|
| Solicitation No: | ERP_13013778730 |
| Publication URL: | To access bid details, please log in. |
APEX Accelerators are an official government contracting resource for small businesses. Find your local APEX Accelerator (opens in new window) for free government expertise related to contract opportunities.
APEX Accelerators are funded in part through a cooperative agreement with the Department of Defense.
The APEX Accelerators program was formerly known as the Procurement Technical Assistance Program (opens in new window) (PTAP).
The requirement is for a 12-month base period of performance with an additional 12 month extension.
The contractor shall provide services including (but not limited to) project management, ethical and regulatory approval, collection and identification of samples and screening.
The contractor shall provide all supplies for sample collection and laboratory testing. NAMRU SOUTH will provide some reagents and supplies for collection and testing depending on funding availability.
In addition, the contractor shall provide disease incidence data available from direct sources such as active human subject studies or indirectly from local health authorities.
The study sites will be located in:
Colombia:
• Antioquia state
• Other sites as requested by NAMRU SOUTH
Monitoring activities will be conducted by NAMRU SOUTH via monthly conference calls and visits to selected field sites during the contract period. Monthly, short reports are expected during the conduction of the study.
The Offeror is encouraged to propose a labor mix and level of effort based on their technical approach. The contractor shall provide general classes of services including (but not limited to) project management, provision of clinical samples and biological specimens, laboratory testing, shipment of samples, data analysis and reporting.
Laboratory molecular testing shall be performed by the contractor in response to NAMRU SOUTH requirements. In addition, the contractor shall provide demographic, clinical and laboratory test results to NAMRU SOUTH.
Monitoring activities will be conducted by NAMRU SOUTH and periodical monitoring visits and reports will be coordinated. Frequent communications such as monthly teleconferences are expected during the conduction of the study.
The delivery address is:
Parasitology – NAMRU SOUTH
Av. Venezuela cd 36 S/N – Bellavista – Callao
Quarter 1 and 2:
Quarter 3 and 4:
Period of performance:
The project is scheduled to be conducted in 12 months.
TASK/
DELIVERABLE
PERFORMANCE STANDARD
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR/
ACCEPTABLE LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE (ALP)
METHOD OF SURVEILLANCE
AND RISK RELATED SCHEDULE
PERFORMANCE RATING
Compliance of products, services, documents, related deliverables, and overall quality of work performance.
Contract requirements met with few minor and no significant problems encountered.
Performance meets all technical and functional requirements in the PWS, and contains pertinent, useful, and informative data and information.
Contractor’s technical performance meets all contract requirements.
Problems that are encountered are minor in nature, and are as follows:
All matters shall be resolved in a satisfactory and timely manner.
100% Inspection
Are study reports complete and are they compliant with various Government regulations?
Assignment of performance rating and criteria:
Excellent: Performance meets and exceeds contract requirements. Performance delivered with no required re-performance /rework; problems encountered were minor and resolved in a highly effective manner, having no impact on schedule, costs, and overall contractor performance.
Acceptable: Performance meets most contract requirements. Performance delivered with minimal re-performance/rework; problems encountered were minor and resolved in a satisfactory manner.
Unacceptable: Performance fails to meet many contract requirements. Substantial problems were encountered and were resolved in a less than satisfactory manner causing significant impact to schedule, cost, and/or overall contractor performance. Significant re-performance or rework required.
Timeliness of
Performance and
Services and Product
Deliverables, including
Administrative aspects
of Performance.
Contract requirements
met with few minor and
no significant problems
encountered.
Performance meets all
technical and functional
requirements in the PWS, and provides on time pertinent, useful, and informative data and information.
Contractor’s technical
performance meets all
contract requirements.
Problems that are
encountered are minor
in nature, and are as follows:
All matters shall be resolved in a satisfactory and timely manner.
100% Inspection
Is the contractor meeting established timeframes?
Assignment of performance rating and criteria:
Excellent: Performance meets all contract
timeliness requirements. Problems that
are encountered are minor and resolved in
a highly effective manner, having no
impact on schedule, cost, and overall
contractor performance.
Acceptable: Performance meets most
timeliness requirements. Performance
delivered with minimal reperformance/
rework; problems encountered were minor and resolved in a satisfactory manner. Minimal impact on schedule, cost, and overall contractor performance
Unacceptable: Performance fails to meet
many timeliness requirements. Substantial
problems were encountered and were resolved in a less than satisfactory manner causing significant impact to schedule,cost, and/or overall contractor performance.
Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like concern for its Customers’ interest including responsiveness to internal and external Governments.
Contract requirements met with few minor and no significant problems encountered.
Performance meets all technical and functional requirements in the PWS, and contains pertinent, useful, and informative data and information.
Contractor’s technical performance meets all contract requirements. Problems that are encountered are minor in nature, and are as follows:
All matters shall be resolved in a satisfactory and timely manner.
100% Inspection
Is the contractor committed to high customer satisfaction? How proactive is the contractor? Is the contractor providing positive value to the Government?
Has the contractor communicated in a timely manner unexpected delays or issues and proposed alternative solutions to meet governments contract requirements?
Assignment of performance rating and criteria:
Excellent: Performance meets and exceeds contract requirements. Performance delivered with no required re-performance /rework; problems encountered were minor and resolved in a highly effective manner, having no impact on schedule, costs, and overall contractor performance.
Acceptable: Performance meets most contract requirements. Performance delivered with minimal re-performance/rework; problems encountered were minor and resolved in a satisfactory manner. Minimal impact on schedule, cost, and overall contractor performance.
Unacceptable: Performance fails to meet many contract requirements. Substantial problems were encountered and were resolved in a less than satisfactory manner causing significant impact to schedule, cost, and/or overall contractor performance. Significant re-performance or rework required.
Overall Satisfaction
Contract requirements met with few minor and no significant problems encountered.
Performance meets all technical and functional requirements in the PWS, and contains pertinent, useful, and informative data and information.
Contractor’s technical performance meets all contract requirements. Problems that are encountered are minor in nature, and are as follows:
All matters shall be resolved in a satisfactory and timely manner.
Periodic Inspection
What is the Governments overall satisfaction with the contractor?
Assignment of performance rating and criteria:
Excellent: Performance meets and exceeds contract requirements. Performance delivered with no required re-performance /rework; problems encountered were minor and resolved in a highly effective manner, having no impact on schedule, costs, and overall contractor performance.
Acceptable: Performance meets most contract requirements. Performance delivered with minimal re-performance/rework; problems encountered were minor and resolved in a satisfactory manner. Minimal impact on schedule, cost, and overall contractor performance.
Unacceptable: Performance fails to meet many contract requirements. Substantial problems were encountered and were resolved in a less than satisfactory manner causing significant impact to schedule, cost, and/or overall contractor performance. Significant re-performance or rework required.

With GovernmentContracts, you can: