State of Idaho
Department of Administration
Division of Public Works
BRAD LITTLE
Governor
STEVEN BAILEY
Director
KELLY BERARD
Administrator
502 North 4th Street
Boise, ID 83720-0072
Telephone (208) 332-1900
www.dpw.idaho.gov
February 9, 2026
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS (RFQ)
TO:
Design Professionals
FROM:
Kelly Berard, DPW Administrator
SUBJECT:
DPW PROJECT NO. 26156
LCSC: Clearwater Hall Siding Replacement
Lewis-Clark State College (LCSC)
Lewiston, Idaho
RFQ submittal packages will be received at the Division of Public Works (DPW) office, located at
502 N. 4th Street, PO Box 83720 Boise, ID 83720-0072, by 2:00 p.m., Mountain Standard Time
Zone, Thursday, March 19, 2026 for furnishing Design Professional services to the State of Idaho.
All questions must be sent to the DPW Project Manager prior to Thursday, March 12, 2026:
Andrew Gibler, Project Manager
Division of Public Works
502 N. 4th St.
PO Box 83720
Boise ID 83720-0072
(208) 791-5089
Andrew.Gibler@adm.idaho.gov
Modifications (addenda) to this RFQ, if any, will be posted on the Division of Public Works web
page at https://dpw.idaho.gov/professional-services/. It is recommended that responders to this RFQ
check this page prior to making their submittal.
The Division of Public Works (DPW) will administer the project according to the terms and
conditions of the award, State laws and guidelines. The Design Professional team will receive
general instructions through the State. A Project Manager from DPW will be assigned to serve as
project manager and liaison between the Department of Administration, Lewis-Clark State College,
and the Design Professional team.
502 North 4th Street, P.O. Box 83720 Boise, Idaho 83720
Page 1
Telephone (208) 332-1900
The Design Professional shall warrant the following: not knowingly hire or engage any illegal aliens
or persons not authorized to work in the United States as required by Title 67, Chapter 79, Idaho
Code. The Design Professional shall take steps to verify that it does not hire or engage any illegal
aliens or persons not authorized to work in the United States; and that any misrepresentation in this
regard or any employment of persons not authorized to work in the United States constitutes a
material breach and shall be cause for the imposition of monetary penalties and/or termination of
any Contract resulting from this RFQ.
Pursuit to Title 54, Chapter 3 of Idaho Code, the Design Professional shall specifically identify an
individual architect licensed in the state of Idaho who will supervise all architectural services
contained in this Request for Qualifications.
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Clearwater Hall is a four-story building located in downtown Lewiston, just a few blocks from the
Lewis-Clark State College (LCSC) main campus. The facility is a two-building complex with the
lower floor holding several community facing services for LCSC, while the upper three floors
contain student dormitories. At the east half of the building, located at 410 Main Street, a large
portion of the exterior cladding at the upper three floors is a fiber cement lap product with pressed
wood material trims that are failing and allowing water intrusion. Failures are a combination of the
use of short-life materials, improper detailing and installation, and wind-driven weather.
The goals of this project are to replace the exterior fiber cement and pressed wood cladding with a
more suitable cladding material and to repair concealed materials that have received damage due to
water intrusion. Additionally, the existing flashing, masonry cladding, and other existing exterior
surfaces are to be evaluated for potential water intrusion. This will require the design team to make
a careful evaluation of the existing conditions, both visible and concealed. Thoughtful detailing
during design will be crucial for success.
A total project budget of $1,500,000 has been established to include all design, construction,
contingency, and all other associated project costs such as fees, reimbursables, permits, testing, and
other project related expenses.
Some select exterior photos of the exterior of the building are provided in the attached Exhibit A.
A site walkthrough of the facility is not planned.
REQUIRED SERVICES
The State is requesting proposals for complete design services. The design team will be responsible
for schematic design, design development, construction documents, construction administration, and
closeout for the design-bid-build project.
At the time of submittal, the Design Professional and required consultants must be properly licensed
to practice in the State of Idaho for their specific disciplines.
The Design Professional will be required to upload all documents to DPW’s cloud-based project
management system, Projectmates. Documents may include, but are not limited to meeting minutes,
502 North 4th Street, P.O. Box 83720 Boise, Idaho 83720
Page 2
Telephone (208) 332-1900
sketches, diagrams, programming analysis, photographs relevant to the project, drawings, project
manual, schedules, cost estimates, etc.
The Design Professional will be required to meet monthly with the DPW Project Manager for the
purpose of providing a verbal and written report regarding the previous month's progress. Such
monthly meetings will show funds expended in the completion of the project and specific
accomplishments related to the completion of the project.
The Design Professional shall keep in mind that during all phases, code compliance, energy
efficiency, and building maintenance concerns should be incorporated into the design.
The Design Professional shall develop all necessary presentation materials for, at a minimum, two
(2) presentations to the Permanent Building Fund Advisory Council.
STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS (SOQ) PROPOSAL CONTENT
SOQ Cover: Provide a cover sheet with the following information:
1. The DPW project number and project title.
2. Your firm’s name.
Cover Letter, 2 points maximum: Include the following elements on one (1) single-sided page:
1. Your firm’s name and location. If your firm has multiple locations, please indicate
which address will be leading the design work.
2. Name and title of the primary point of contact (include no more than one). Include
the phone number (with area code) and email address of the primary point of contact.
3. An introductory statement as desired.
A. Basic Qualifications, 8 points maximum: Include a summary of your firm’s basic qualifications.
Limit to two (2) single-sided pages. Include the following elements:
1. Firm name, office location(s), firm history, staff size, and special expertise relevant
to this project. (0-2 point)
2. Firm organizational type, list of officers/partners, tax ID. (0-2 point)
3. List the Architect of Record, registered in the state of Idaho, who will supervise and
be a part of the Project Team for all architectural services contained within this
project. Include the license number. (0-2 points)
4. List the firm’s intended Project Manager who will be a part of the Project Team for
primary project development and oversight. Include the license number if this team
member has one. (0-2 points)
5. List any other consultants that you intend to use on this project. (optional)
B. Team Member Qualifications, 12 points maximum: Provide a description of the qualifications
of each team member to be assigned to this project. Limit to one (1) page per individual. Include
only team members who would presumptively be assigned to this project. For each team member,
provide the following criteria:
1. Team member name and title.
2. Number of years in current role.
3. Education and training.
4. Brief overview of responsibilities anticipated to this project.
5. Amount of involvement anticipated on this project.
502 North 4th Street, P.O. Box 83720 Boise, Idaho 83720
Page 3
Telephone (208) 332-1900
6. Brief overview of experience on similar projects with relevant experience of
detailing, specifying, and construction administration.
C. Technical Approach to Project, 24 points maximum: Describe your team’s anticipated
approach to this project. Limit to four (4) single-sided pages. Include the following elements:
1. Understanding of DPW process outlined in REQUIRED SERVICES. Explain how
your Team has used Projectmates (or a similar system), guided the client through
design phases, interacted with DOPL or other code agencies, presented at PBFAC (or
similar), and performed construction administration responsibilities. (0-6 points)
2. Understanding of the project scope and individual program needs as outlined in the
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT. Based on your Team’s experience with similar
project types, explain how your Team would work with stakeholders to identify
specific needs, perform an analysis of the existing system components, provide full
design services with periodic reviews, and manage construction administration tasks
for a successful project. (0-6 points)
3. Explanation of how your Team will design within budget, provide accurate cost
estimating, develop and maintain a schedule, and minimize construction change
orders in the Design-Bid-Build delivery method. Include a description of the Team’s
resources available to meet the project schedule. (0-6 points)
4. An analysis of potential challenges, opportunities, and solutions specific to this
project. (0-6 points)
D. Project Examples, 20 points maximum: Provide four (4) project examples (0-5 points for each
project). Limit to one (1) single-sided page per project. Points will prioritize Team Member
collaboration, water intrusion analysis in design, and exterior cladding replacement. Include the
following elements for each example:
1. Project name, location, and summary of the work showing specific relevance.
2. List of Team Members in this SOQ that participated in the project example. Indicate
each member’s role and level of involvement.
3. Design start date, construction start date, construction finish date. Provide a short
description of any significant adjustments.
4. Original construction budget and final construction budget. Provide a short
description of any significant adjustments.
Format, 4 points maximum: To assist the SOQ evaluation, it is desirable to format the submittal
similar to the headings listed above. The submittals should be clear and to the point while following
the page length guidelines provided above. Please consider the following guidelines:
1. All pages should be Letter (8.5 x 11) size. A font size of 10 or larger should be used.
2. Double-sided pages are allowed; a double-sided page equals two single-sided pages.
3. Section dividers are allowed. Do not provide information on the section dividers that
is required to be elsewhere in the SOQ and cannot be found where requested.
4. If the information requested is not addressed in the section in which it is requested,
maximum points will not be awarded for those criteria.
5. The Selection Committee will not be required to review any supplemental
information or appendices provided in the SOQ. The intent of the limitations outlined
here is to keep the SOQ documents concise and to give the Selection Committee
comparable information that can be reviewed objectively in a timely manner.
502 North 4th Street, P.O. Box 83720 Boise, Idaho 83720
Page 4
Telephone (208) 332-1900
The primary point of contact provided will be notified of all shortlist rankings (if interviews are
required), schedule updates, final rankings, and general Request for Qualifications information.
Failure to include this element may result in your firm being found non-responsive.
SUBMITTAL
Submit five (5) hard copies of the submittal and one (1) USB drive containing a PDF of the submittal.
PDF submittals must follow the same guidelines listed above.
EVALUATION
A selection committee consisting of two (2) persons from DPW, two (2) persons from the Agency,
and one (1) independent Design Professional will evaluate each submittal based on the requirements
above. The teams will be ranked based on the total SOQ score. The maximum points for the initial
ranking criteria are shown in the following table:
Section
A
B
C
D
Point Scoring for SOQ Initial Rankings
Criteria
Max Possible Points
Cover Sheet
0
Cover Letter
2
Basic Qualifications
8
Team Member Qualifications
12
Technical Approach to Project
24
Project Examples
20
Format
4
Total
70
The selection committee may choose to interview any, all, or none of the respondents as may be in
the best interest of the State. If interviews are held, the top ranked teams will be notified as to time,
place, and content of the interview. The maximum points for the interview, if required, will be 30
points. If interviews are conducted, the written and the interview points will be combined for a final
total score with a maximum of 100 points.
The names of all firms submitting proposals and the names, if any, selected for interviews shall be
public information. At the conclusion of the RFQ process, committee comments and evaluation
scores, as well as the contents of all proposals become public information. Firms that have not been
selected will be notified in writing after the conclusion of the selection process.
AWARD
Based on the selection committee’s combined results for the initial rankings and interviews, the
Division of Public Works will recommend a course of action to the Permanent Building Fund
Advisory Council (PBFAC) at their meeting scheduled on May 5, 2026. If the ranking is approved,
a notice of intent to negotiate will be issued to the Design Professional by the Division of Public
502 North 4th Street, P.O. Box 83720 Boise, Idaho 83720
Page 5
Telephone (208) 332-1900
This is the opportunity summary page. It provides an overview of this opportunity and a preview of the attached documentation.