| Location: | Michigan |
|---|---|
| Posted: | May 19, 2025 |
| Due: | May 28, 2025 |
| Agency: | HOMELAND SECURITY, DEPARTMENT OF |
| Type of Government: | Federal |
| Category: |
|
| Solicitation No: | 70T05025Q6115N003 |
| Publication URL: | To access bid details, please log in. |
APEX Accelerators are an official government contracting resource for small businesses. Find your local APEX Accelerator (opens in new window) for free government expertise related to contract opportunities.
APEX Accelerators are funded in part through a cooperative agreement with the Department of Defense.
The APEX Accelerators program was formerly known as the Procurement Technical Assistance Program (opens in new window) (PTAP).
In accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 4.1102 quoters are required to be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) at the time an offer or quotation is submitted.
The evaluation procedures to be used are as follows:
Award will be made using the lowest price technically acceptable (LPTA) selection process. Award may be made on initial quotations. Therefore, each initial quote should contain the quoter's best terms from a technical, all submission requirements and price standpoint. However, the Government reserves the right to contact quoters if it is
later determined by the contracting officer to be necessary or in the government's best interests. The LPTA process will proceed as follows:
1. Quotes may be removed from consideration for, but not limited to, the following reasons:
•Quotes that are not received timely
2. Quotes will be ordered by price from lowest to highest.
If the lowest quote is determined not to be acceptable for any reason, then the next lowest priced quote will receive an evaluation as described above. The process will continue in order by price until a quote from a responsible contractor is determined to be acceptable and priced fairly and reasonably.
(e) Each Factor will be evaluated as follows:
Factor 1. Technical Acceptability
Technical Acceptability will be rated on an "acceptable" or "unacceptable" basis as follows: Acceptable - The quoted range meets all technical criterion stated in the Statement of Work.
Unacceptable - The quoted range does not meet all technical criterion stated in the Statement of Work.
Factor 2. Past Performance
Past performance will be rated on an "acceptable" or "unacceptable" basis as follows:
Acceptable - Based on the quoter's performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the quoter will successfully perform the required effort, or the quoter's performance record is unknown. (See note below.)
Unacceptable - Based on the quoter's performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the quoter will be able to successfully perform the required effort
Note: In the case of a quoter without a record of relevant past performance, or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the quoter may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance. Therefore, the quoter shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, "unknown" shall be considered "acceptable."
Note: Quoters are not required or requested to submit past performance references. The Government will use public and Government-restricted sources (e.g. CPARS) to evaluate past performance.
Factor 3. Price
Price will not be rated. Price analysis will be conducted to determine reasonableness.
Submission Requirements: All requirements must be received in order to be considered technically acceptable.
-Completed Pricing schedule: Refer to the attached RFQ Fillable Requirement for structure of pricing schedule
-Acknowledgement of Statement of Work requirements
-Most Recent Lead Testing results in accordance with OSHA
-Applicable fill in clauses and provisions located throughout the Combined synopsis and the attached RFQ fillable requirements
-Subcontractor Agreement if Applicable
| May 1, 2025 | [Solicitation (Original)] Firing Range Service for Detroit Field Office |
| May 23, 2025 | [Solicitation (Updated)] Firing Range Service for Detroit Field Office |
| Jun 2, 2025 | [Solicitation (Updated)] Firing Range Service for Detroit Field Office |
| Jun 16, 2025 | [Solicitation (Updated)] Firing Range Service for Detroit Field Office |
| Jun 23, 2025 | [Solicitation (Updated)] Firing Range Service for Detroit Field Office |
| Jun 26, 2025 | [Solicitation (Updated)] Firing Range Service for Detroit Field Office |
| Jun 30, 2025 | [Solicitation (Updated)] Firing Range Service for Detroit Field Office |

With GovernmentContracts, you can:
Follow Overview of Fielding Agile Supplies, Support and Training Enhancing Readiness (FASSTER) Active
DEPT OF DEFENSE
Bid Due: 7/03/2026
Description: Stadium Sidewalk, Drainage, and Shot Put Area Improvements Department: Corunna Public Schools
State of Michigan
Bid Due: 6/19/2026
Description: Captive Financial Examinations of Insurance Companies Department: Insurance and Financial Services Buyer:
State of Michigan
Bid Due: 6/22/2026
Request for Proposal (RFP) 2026 Bridge-Culvert Inspection The Washtenaw County Road Commission (WCRC)
Washtenaw County Road Commission
Bid Due: 6/24/2026