MnDOT Contract No. 1063027
Exhibit A: Specifications, Duties, and Scope of Work
I. Background Information and Contract Purpose
A. Project Background
The State and its local partners, including the City of Floodwood, are interested in reviewing the United States
(US) route 2 highway corridor in preparation for an upcoming resurfacing project (State Project (SP) 6906-20)
currently planned for 2031 in the Capital Highway Investment Plan (CHIP). The study area will include US 2 from
just east of Ash Street to east of Trunk Highway (TH) 73 in the City of Floodwood. In 2024, District 1 completed a
resurfacing project on two segments of US 2 both east and west of Floodwood city limits but did not address the
section of roadway in between that runs through Floodwood due to the many needs that could not be
adequately addressed given the scope and expedited schedule of the 2024 project. This corridor study will cover
the section of US 2 between the recently resurfaced sections of roadway. Findings from this planning study will
contribute to the resurfacing project planned for 2031.
The study will review crash history and evaluate safety improvements at key intersections, evaluate traffic data
and traffic calming measures, investigate improving bicycle, pedestrian and transit facilities and crossings
throughout the corridor, and facilitate discussions with stakeholders and the public. Due to the relatively wide
cross section of this section of US 2, the study will also evaluate the cross section for potential turning lane space
reallocation. The City of Floodwood has purchased 127.5 acres of land at the southwest end of the corridor and
is undergoing a Small Area Plan for the mixed-use development, including extending water, sewer, and roads.
This corridor study will coordinate with these planning efforts to evaluate transportation connections to US 2
and the new development.
This study includes evaluation of multiple public road intersections and private access points. There are several
concerns that have been identified within the planned study limits including: intersection geometry, speed
concerns, safe pedestrian crossing locations, access management.
The Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) railroad runs parallel to the US 2 corridor. Additionally, as an
Oversize/Overweight Superload Corridor, there is a relatively high heavy commercial annual average daily traffic
(HCAADT) rate (12-16%) on the US 2 corridor. This has an impact on operations of the THs in the vicinity. In
addition, US 2 acts as a barrier for the community since its route goes through town with key /destinations on
both sides of the highway. The community utilizes all modes of transportation to traverse the corridor with
certain intersections, such as 7th Avenue, having higher concentrations of pedestrian crossings. The US 2 corridor
is a recreational corridor with the Floodwood and Meadowlands snowmobile/Off-Highway Vehicle (OHV) trails
crossing the corridor in multiple locations.
This study aims to reduce speeds through the corridor, improve accessibility of pedestrian facilities, recommend
geometric improvements at access points, as well as identify freight use and active transportation connectivity
along the corridor. The study will address these issues through right-sized recommendations for various
segments of the corridor combined into one corridor improvement concept using the Federal Highway
Administration’s (FHWA’s) Safe System Approach.
1
MnDOT Contract No. 1063027
Exhibit A: Specifications, Duties, and Scope of Work
B. Contract Purpose
The purpose of the US 2 corridor study is to:
1. Review crash history and traffic data and evaluate safety improvements and traffic calming measures
throughout the corridor.
2. Evaluate existing conditions of the corridor and identified intersections, including multimodal
(pedestrian, bicycle, transit) and trail connectivity, freight traffic use, and access management.
3. Evaluate future conditions that account for planned mixed-use development growth and any locally
anticipated development in Floodwood.
4. Facilitate discussion between local partners, stakeholders, and the public.
5. Based on findings, identify “right-sized” improvements for this corridor to be incorporated into scoping
for the State’s programmed roadway improvement project, specifically including the following:
a. Identify recommended improvements at both intersections of US 2 and TH 73 and provide the
recommended geometry.
b. Identify cross section space reallocation and associated turn lane recommendations for the
corridor at both a preservation-level scope (scope level of planned project) and a
reconstruction-level scope (should additional funds be secured through local partners).
6. Provide a geometric layout for the urban area of Floodwood that incorporates the preferred cross-
section and addresses access management. The layout should address the high speed to low speed
transition areas.
All of which will provide a common vision and guidance for managing the corridor now and into the future. This
vision for the corridor is needed to identify and develop future improvements for the Study area both for the
planned roadway project and for potential additional improvements should external funding be secured.
C. Contract Tasks Overview & Logistics
Areas of Study include highway capacity and delay metrics, such as level of service (LOS) and travel time
reliability, at both intersections with TH 73, traffic and pedestrian/bicycle travel patterns, trail connectivity,
freight movements, future development, evaluation of opportunities to reduce the frequency and severity of
crashes.
To develop a shared vision for this corridor, a public engagement process will be part of the assessment to
gather input, educate, and gain support for improvements. The process must address the relationship and
balance of the many competing needs associated with the study area.
The final study report will help create a vision and prioritize improvements to ensure the corridor continues to
meet the needs of the transportation users and surrounding community into the future.
The study is proposed to begin as soon as possible and will need to be completed no later than June 30, 2027.
The study and contract will be managed and administered by the State. The study will be led by a Project
Management Team (PMT) which would include the Contractor and representatives from key State functional
2
MnDOT Contract No. 1063027
Exhibit A: Specifications, Duties, and Scope of Work
groups, such as planning, traffic, project management/scoping, and public engagement. The PMT will meet
frequently to discuss issues, coordinate action items, and provide direction for the study.
The study will also be guided by a Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), including the Contractor, the State
Project Manager, and at least one Partner representing Saint Louis County and the City of Floodwood, and select
community organization representatives, such as Floodwood Service & Training and Arrowhead Transit. The TAC
will meet less frequently than the PMT and will serve as a coordination forum for all of the Partners involved
with the study. TAC meetings are anticipated to follow major project milestones (e.g., study introduction,
discuss alternatives, review alternatives, review corridor recommendations, study wrap-up).
For purposes of this Scope of Services document, the following definition of terms applies. The term Contract
Partners or Partners will be in reference to the City of Floodwood, Saint Louis County, and the State. The term
Stakeholders will be in reference to the additional public agencies, school district, the general public and
businesses immediately adjacent to US 2.
II. Work Tasks
Task 1.0 Project Management
A. Project Management Role
The Contractor will be required to provide high level project management skills for this contract. This will include
developing a schedule for the work activities included in this scope. The schedule will be updated and provided
to the State on a biweekly basis. The Contractor’s responsibilities will place them in the project’s leadership
position regarding the stakeholder communications and perceptions. The Contractor’s Project Manager must
lead the project in a way that requires minimal guidance and oversight from the State’s Project Manager. The
Contractor will schedule and facilitate a project kickoff meeting to confirm the basic project objectives, solidify a
work plan, and obtain consensus on the project requirements. This meeting will occur no later than 15 business
days after notice to proceed. The kick-off meeting will be held virtually. The Contractor and the PMT will have
monthly assessment update meetings. These PMT meetings will typically be 60 minutes in duration and will be
virtual. The Contractor and the TAC will have update meetings following major project milestones. These TAC
meetings will typically be 90 minutes in duration and will be hybrid (both in-person and virtual – the Contractor
will be expected to attend in-person). The Contractor and the State’s Project Manager will have biweekly update
meetings to discuss scope, schedule, budget. These meetings will typically be 30 minutes in duration and will be
virtual.
B. Project Administration
The Contractor will perform general administration of the contract, operation of the contract details, and
communication of all project activities, progress, and findings to the State’s Project Manager. The Contractor
will invoice all costs under this contract using the State’s Source Type Codes 1010 (Project Management) for
work and expenses related to contract Administration, 1808 (Traffic Data/Analysis), 0054 (Public Engagement),
and 6244 (Corridor Planning) for all other costs. The Contractor will prepare invoices accompanied by:
3
MnDOT Contract No. 1063027
Exhibit A: Specifications, Duties, and Scope of Work
1. A cover letter explaining the general status of the project, including at a minimum the work completed
to date, anticipated remaining efforts, and required schedule changes.
2. Progress report form
3. Supporting data for direct expenses
4. An updated project status report reflecting schedule activities identified by the State’s project manager
The Contractor will store all deliverables in ProjectWise whether the file is incomplete, in draft form, or the final
deliverable. State will provide restricted access to a ProjectWise document center for use as the project file
transfer vehicle and repository.
C. Quality Management
A Contractor team member will be assigned the title of quality assurance (QA)/quality control (QC) manager and
have the responsibility of reviewing submittals, prior to submittal, to ensure compliance with the State’s Quality
Management Process (QMP). The Contractor’s QA/QC Manager will develop a project-specific QMP within the
first 10 workdays under contract. Components of the QMP must include the following project specific items: a
list of requirements, intent of the QMP, philosophy of the QMP, technical document review process, checking
procedures, QC verification and definitions.
D. Corridor Vision and Goals
The Contractor will initiate this task at project startup to develop goals for the corridor and use these as
framework to guide the study. The project team will prepare an initial draft with ideas at a high level. Following
input from the PMT and agency stakeholders, a draft vision and goals statement will be brought for public
discussion before being finalized. Document results in Corridor Vision and Goals Document including
relationship to Statewide Multimodal Transportation Plan (SMTP) objectives.
Task 2.0 Traffic Data Collection & Analysis
A. Data collection and analysis provided by the Contractor (in close coordination with the PMT)
1. Existing corridor and intersection designs and characteristics.
a. Asset condition
b. Known maintenance issues
c. Utilities scan
d. Inventory of freight designations, rail crossings, other freight facilities
e. Inventory of multimodal facilities including bicycle, pedestrian, transit, and OHVs throughout the
corridor
2. Current corridor:
a. Collect speed data on the US 2 corridor. Locations should include intersections with US 2 at Ash
Street, 7th Avenue, West Junction TH 73, East Junction TH 73. Aim to collect speed data by late
summer 2026. Assume up to 4 locations.
b. Traffic volumes (historical Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT))
4
MnDOT Contract No. 1063027
Exhibit A: Specifications, Duties, and Scope of Work
c. 24 hour turning movement counts (weekday counts at 7th Avenue and 9th Avenue, and both
weekday and weekend counts at West Junction TH 73 and East Junction TH 73). Use Streetlight
to identify the high volume periods prior to taking real-time counts. Turning movement counts
with separate bicycles, pedestrians, and heavy commercial counts. Aim to collect turning
movement counts by late summer 2026.
i. Traffic counts collected need to be for at least 24 hours so that they can be integrated
into the state’s traffic monitoring program. Count data must not be collected during a
weather event that disrupts typical travel behavior, or if any incidents, work zones,
events, or detours are present within the study area.
ii. Turning movement counts must be broken down between vehicle categories including
passenger vehicle and single unit and combination unit heavy commercial. Original
count data files from the collection device will need to be delivered to the project
manager and the State Traffic Monitoring Program within 30 days of collection.
d. Volume/Capacity ratio to document roadway capacity and reliability needs.
e. The most current 5-year crash history along the assessment limits.
f. Crash performance for intersections and segments compared to statewide averages. This
includes summarizing crash rates, Fatal and Serious Injury Crash Rate (FAR) Index, critical crash
rates and critical FAR index. The crash rates will be for the most current 5-year period available.
Provide crash diagrams for each identified intersection and identify concerning crash patterns
based on this analysis. Identify all fatal and serious injury crashes within the assessment limits
for the most current 10-year period available. Identify all crashes involving vulnerable road users
and identify whether corridor is on the bicycle-pedestrian high injury network. Crash
information will be obtained from Crashmart and/or MnCAT2.
g. Site observations including a field walk to identify locations of substandard roadway geometrics,
visibility, signage, and other issues/concerns.
h. Pedestrian and bicycle counts. Use camera counts to collect pedestrian and bicycle volumes and
typical movements/trips corridor-wide. Use camera counts to inform a high-level origin-
destination study for pedestrians and bicyclists. Aim to collect pedestrian and bicycle counts by
late summer/early fall 2026.
The method for obtaining the data will be determined by the Contractor, based on efficiency and
approved by the State Project Manager. Observations will be made regarding regional and local traffic
patterns based on the data collected above.
3. Corridor Origin-Destination (O-D) Assessment
a. Contractor will obtain O-D information from StreetLight Data (www.streetlightdata.com) for
study segments.
b. Contractor will create an O-D matrix and graphical representation of existing travel pattern
scenarios of the motorists (freight vs. general occupancy vehicles) that use the US 2 study area,
with an emphasis on the inbound/outbound traffic on each of the four TH legs (US 2 and TH 73).
Specific information to study will be determined by the PMT.
c. Contractor will summarize data in easily consumable statements/bullet points for a public
audience.
5
This is the opportunity summary page. It provides an overview of this opportunity and a preview of the attached documentation.