WT25052/HSIPL-5008(226) REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) SYSTEMIC INTERSECTION SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS Provide professional consultant services to design intersection safety improvements at three intersections and provide assistance during the construction phase of the project.
| Location: | California |
|---|---|
| Posted: | Mar 2, 2026 |
| Due: | Mar 30, 2026 |
| Agency: | City of Stockton |
| Type of Government: | State & Local |
| Category: |
|
| Solicitation No: | WT25052/HSIPL-5008(226) |
| Publication URL: | To access bid details, please log in. |
| General Information | |
| Due Date: | Monday March 30, 2026 |
| Opening Time: | 3:00 PM |
| Published Date: | Monday, March 2, 2026 |
| Last Updated: | Monday, March 2, 2026 |
| Bid Orientation: | N/A |
|
Description: |
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
SYSTEMIC INTERSECTION SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. WT25052 / FEDERAL PROJECT NO. HSIPL-5008(226) Provide professional consultant services to design intersection safety improvements at three intersections and provide assistance during the construction phase of the project.
Consultant must be familiar with the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP), and Carbon Reduction Program Local (CRPL) funded projects, Caltrans Local Assistance Programs Guidelines (LAPG) and Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM). Likewise, the Consultant and Consultant Staff must demonstrate recent design experience on similar projects. |
| Award Date: | |
| Related Links | |
| Description: | URL: |
| Insurance Requirements | link |
| Construction/Demolition/Recycling Plan/Report | link |
| Federal Wage Rates | link |
| Prevailing Wages (2025-2) | link |
| Contacts | |||
| Role: | Name: | Phone: | Email: |
| Project Manager | Evan Banister | (209) 937-8299 | |
| Backup | Wes Johnson | (209) 937-8088 | |
| Plan Holder's List | Dawn Clement | (209) 937-8226 | |
| Letter of Clarification: | ||
| There are no Letters of Clarification documents available at this time. | ||
| Questions & Answers: | ||
| There are no Questions & Answers documents available at this time. | ||
| Submittals | ||
| There are no Submittal documents available at this time. | ||
| Job Walk | ||
| There are no Job Walk documents available at this time. | ||
| Plan Holder's List | ||
| There are no Plan Holder's Lists available at this time. | ||
| Notice | ||
| Document: | Request for Proposals | |
| Plans, Attachments & Agendas | ||
| ATTACHMENT A | Vicinity Map | |
| ATTACHMENT B | Acknowledgement of Monument Preservation Form | |
| ATTACHMENT C | Instructions to Proposers - Federally Funded Contracts | |
| ATTACHMENT D | Federal Aid Consultant Contract Provisions | |
| ATTACHMENT E | Sample Cost Proposal (Exhibit 10-H1 in Local Assistance Manual) | |
| ATTACHMENT F | Evaluation Scoring Sheet | |
| Document: | Project Insurance Requirements | |
Last Update :
Attachment Preview
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
FOR THE
SYSTEMIC INTERSECTION SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS
City Project No. WT25052
Federal Project No. HSIPL-5008(226)
Issued by:
City of Stockton
Public Works Department
501 W. Weber Avenue
Building 2, 3rd Floor
Stockton, CA 95203
Date Issued:
Written Questions Due:
Date Proposals Due:
Monday, March 2, 2026
Wednesday, March 18, 2026
Monday, March 30, 2026, 3:00 P.M.
Late Submittals Will Not Be Accepted
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The City of Stockton (City) requests a Technical Proposal from qualified consulting firms
to provide professional consultant services to design intersection safety improvements at
three intersections: March Lane at Fred Russo Drive, March Lane and Precissi Lane, and
Hammer Lane and Montauban Avenue. A selection committee will comprehensively rank
firms based on, but not limited to, proposals, qualifications, references, and other relevant
information.
The Consultant must be familiar with the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP),
and Carbon Reduction Program Local (CRPL) funded projects, Caltrans Local Assistance
Programs Guidelines (LAPG) and Local Assistance Procedures Manual (LAPM).
Likewise, the Consultant and Consultant staff must demonstrate recent design
experience on similar projects. The consultant shall also provide assistance during the
construction phase of the project.
2.0 BACKGROUND
The City recently secured HSIP funds for the design and construction of multiple
intersection safety improvements at three intersections: March Lane at Fred Russo Drive,
March Lane and Precissi Lane, and Hammer Lane and Montauban Avenue. This HSIP
project was identified as a high-priority project through the City's recently completed
Systemic Safety Analysis Report and Local Road Safety Plan (SSAR/LRSP) analysis and
findings. This SSAR/LRSP report is a data-driven evaluation of traffic safety improvement
needs and sets forth a vision and goals specific to roadway safety performance.
The Hammer Lane/Montauban Avenue intersection had 26 broadside collisions, possibly
due to ‘large box’ commercial uses (e.g., Costco and Honda, Acura, and Toyota
dealerships). Congestion is often high along Montauban Avenue and protected left turn
signals and improved visibility crosswalks are needed to eliminate collisions. In addition,
parents and children of Clairmont Elementary School utilize Montauban Avenue as one
of their main commuting thoroughfares.
March Lane/Precissi Lane recorded two fatalities involving a bicyclist and a pedestrian,
with seven collisions involving pedestrians and/or bicyclists at or near the intersection
within the last five years. University of the Pacific’s Monagan Hall and Delta College are
on opposite sides of March Lane. Many pedestrians and bicyclists use Precissi Lane as
the main thoroughfare connecting the two campuses.
March Lane/Fred Russo Drive recorded nine broadside collisions involving left-turn
movements. In addition, two pedestrians and three bicyclists were injured in collisions
with motorists at the intersection. Though this intersection's surrounding land-use is
residential, there are two elementary schools, a high school, and two public parks near
and Fred Russo Drive is the main thoroughfare to March Lane. Congestion is often high
at this intersection, and many children walk or bike along Fred Russo Drive to school or
parks.
Request for Proposals
Systemic Intersection Safety Improvements
Project No. WT25052 / HSIPL-5008(226)
Page 2 of 14
3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed project involves installing protected left-turn signal heads, larger signal
lens, retro-reflective back-plates, high reflectivity lane and crosswalk markings, traffic
video detection system, and Accessible Pedestrian Signals & near side signal heads at
select locations. (See Attachment A – Vicinity Map).
4.0 SCOPE OF WORK
Each consultant shall prepare a detailed scope of services for the design of this project
based, in part and at a minimum, on information presented in this Request for Proposal,
and other available information. The consultant shall provide a cost proposal, which
accomplishes the objectives of the project.
The consultant shall incorporate in their design the installation of the protected left-turn
signal heads, larger signal lens, retro-reflective back-plates, high reflectivity lane and
crosswalk markings, traffic video detection system, and Accessible Pedestrian Signals &
near side signal heads.
These intersection improvements propose to address intersection, pedestrian and
bicyclist safety concerns by installing 1) protected left-turn signals, 2) larger signal heads,
3) high-visibility thermoplastic crosswalk, lane, and limit line markings, 4) Accessible
Pedestrian Signals (APS) and Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) Programming, and 5)
video detection systems for actuation.
Consultants are encouraged to include items that are thought necessary for this project.
4.1 Background Research
The consultant shall research and review existing topographic mapping, photos,
right of way maps, “as-built” plans, record maps, surveys, assessor maps, local
street improvement plans, collision reports, sight distance, approach speed, total
pedestrians and vehicle volumes, public transit routes, grade, need of advance
warning signs and flashers, and other geometrical and operational characteristics
for the project.
The Consultant shall conduct field reconnaissance of the entire project limits. The
Consultant shall work with all pertinent utilities to identify conflicts, coordinate utility
plan reviews, conduct necessary coordination meetings, and locate designed
improvements as required to facilitate any utility relocations. The consultant will
need to coordinate with the City to the maximum extent possible to route this
information to utility companies. Consultant must show all existing utilities that will
be impacted or cause impact by the proposed project. The consultant is responsible
for arranging and coordinating with all utility companies, within the project sphere, to
resolve any utility issues.
Request for Proposals
Systemic Intersection Safety Improvements
Project No. WT25052 / HSIPL-5008(226)
Page 3 of 14
The Consultant shall identify required permits, prepare all permit applications, and
assist the City with negotiations relative to permit conditions, if required. Permit fees
will be paid by the City.
4.2 Environmental Services
The project is funded with federal funds, and therefore California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) compliance is
required through Caltrans District 10 Office of Local Assistance. The consultant shall
be responsible for coordinating with Caltrans and Stakeholders as needed, including
completion of the Preliminary Environmental Study (PES). Consultant will prepare
any studies that Caltrans requires in the approved PES.
The consultant shall be responsible for printing, mailing, delivering, and distributing
to appropriate Agencies and Stakeholders to obtain environmental clearance.
4.3 Utility Coordination
The consultant will be responsible for performing utility investigations and
coordination with utility owners throughout the project development process. The
Consultant will be present at all necessary meetings with each utility owner. The
consultant will be responsible for, but not limited to, the following:
• Prepare a project limits map and request utility information from each utility owner
within the area of work.
• Consultant will use data provided by utility companies and perform field work
such as potholing, ground penetrating radar, or other technology to confirm depth
information. This field work should be performed as soon as possible so that
conflicts can be identified, and utility companies can be notified of any necessary
relocation.
• Prepare Utility Letter “A” during preliminary design phase to the affected utility
owners for City to review and approve prior to transmitting to utility owners.
Information on existing utilities obtained as a result of the “A” letter will be
transferred to base maps in both plan and profile view. A copy of the utility data
obtained from utility owners will be provided to the City and the originals will be
filed in the project files.
• Prepare Utility Letter “B” during 65% design phase to the affected utility owners
for City to review and approve prior to transmitting to utility owners. Two sets of
half-sized 65% plans will be provided to each utility owner as an attachment to
the letter. The letter will request that utility owners verify any utility conflicts with
proposed improvements and indicate whether any future utilities are proposed in
the area that may require accommodation through the improved area.
Information on existing utilities obtained as a result of the “B” letter will be used
to determine potential utility conflicts and to resolve the conflicts identified. A copy
Request for Proposals
Systemic Intersection Safety Improvements
Project No. WT25052 / HSIPL-5008(226)
Page 4 of 14
of the utility data obtained from utility owners will be provided to the City and the
originals will be filed in the project files.
• Prepare Utility Letter “C” during 100% design phase to the affected utility owners
for City to review and approve prior to transmitting to utility owners. Two sets of
half-sized 100% plans will be provided to each utility owner as an attachment to
the letter. The letter will indicate to the utility owners whether any changes have
been made to the project plans since the Utility Letter “B” and will request written
confirmation of utility relocations and utility relocation schedule. A copy of the
utility data obtained from utility owners will be provided to the City and the
originals will be filed in the project files.
• Consultant shall meet with utility companies as needed to ensure that conflicts
are identified and relocations performed if necessary.
4.4 Plans, Specifications, and Estimate
The Consultant shall prepare complete PS&E documents, which include design
improvement plans, traffic control plans, electrical plans, drainage plans, technical
specifications, and engineer’s estimate. The PS&E shall be prepared according to
the City’s standards and current CA MUTCD, as appropriate. Consultant shall use
modeling software to determine acceptable Level of Service (LOS) and geometric
layout and submit recommendations to City for concurrence. Prepare a base map
showing existing information to facilitate the design of all the necessary
improvements. The base map limits shall be sufficient to cover all necessary
improvements within the project area.
A. Intersection Safety Design Process – Intermediate Reviews
Improvement plans for safety additions and striping, roadway, drainage,
electrical, erosion control and or water pollution prevention and miscellaneous
plans shall be submitted for review to the City at 30%, 65%, 90% and 100%
completion stage. The Consultant will provide one electronic (PDF format). With
each stage, the review comments from the previous stage shall be itemized and
a written response to each shall be prepared in a comment matrix. The original
red-line comments from the reviewing agency shall be returned with the
succeeding submittal.
Consultant shall provide a project specification outline and project estimates at
the 65% submittal and complete project estimate and specification at 100%
submittal.
1. Preliminary 30% Design
At a minimum the 30% design should include a basic geometric
configuration of roadway striping layouts, curb alignments at round corner
improvements, and typical cross sections. Consultant to consider turning
motions of nearby schools and residential homes, Stockton Fire
Request for Proposals
Systemic Intersection Safety Improvements
Project No. WT25052 / HSIPL-5008(226)
Page 5 of 14
This is the opportunity summary page. It provides an overview of this opportunity and a preview of the attached documentation.
Daily notification on new contract opportunities
With GovernmentContracts, you can:
- Find more opportunities and win more business
- Receive daily alerts for all new bid opportunities
- Get contract opportunities matched to your business
See also
...Links Description: URL: Insurance Requirements Link Construction/Demolition/Recycling Plan/Report Link..., posts, rivets, etc. Project ...
City of Stockton
Bid Due: 6/04/2026
...Links Description: URL: Insurance Requirements link Opens in new window Construction/Demolition/Recycling...
City of Stockton
Bid Due: 7/02/2026
...Links Description: URL: Insurance Requirements link Opens in new window Construction/Demolition/Recycling...
City of Stockton
Bid Due: 7/02/2026
...estimate of probable construction cost for the removal of existing guardrails and replacement ...
City of Stockton
Bid Due: 6/19/2026
* Disclaimer: Information regarding bids, requests for proposals (RFPs), or requests for qualifications (RFQs) is provided on this website only for convenience and does not constitute official public notice. Persons wishing to respond to or inquire about bids, RFPs, or RFQs should contact the appropriate government department.