Assessment Data Management System

RFP # WRESA-47-2026-2027-04

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
FOR
ASSESSMENT DATA MANAGEMENT SYSTEM

BID SUMMARY

Commodity/Service Being Requested: Assessment Data Management System

Type of Solicitation: Request for Proposals (RFP) – Wayne RESA, in partnership with the CoPro+ cooperative purchasing program managed by the Public Procurement Institute of Michigan (PPIM), a nonprofit organization, is competitively bidding and awarding a Master Agreement to a Contractor or Contractors for an Assessment Data Management System.

Type of Resulting Contract: Statewide Cooperative Contract – As a result of this RFP, Wayne RESA will work with the CoPro+ cooperative purchasing program to market and extend the resulting Contract to other public municipalities, non-profit organizations and schools statewide in having access to Contract(s) for an Assessment Data Management System. This Contract will enable public municipalities, non-profit organizations, and schools to “piggyback” and purchase commodity/service on an “as needed” basis from the Proposer(s). Proposers shall list which regions you will service and identify any limitations on commodities and/or services areas within Appendix A – Regional Map, within this RFP.

Resulting Contract Term: Three (3) years with two (2) one-year renewal options. The base term for this Contract is for three (3) years. At the end of the initial term, this Agreement will be evaluated. If the parties agree that it is a mutually beneficial relationship, the Agreement may be extended through a signed Amendment by both parties for up to two (2) additional one (1) year options, which may be exercised individually or together.

RFP TIMETABLE	DATE / TIME
RFP Issue Date	May 27, 2026
Pre-Proposal Meeting**:	June 10, 2026, at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time
Submission of Question(s) from Proposer Due	June 12, 2026, by 12:00 p.m. Eastern Time
Answers to Proposer Questions Due	June 19, 2026
Proposals Due*	July 1, 2026, by 12:00 p.m. Eastern Time
Contract Start	August, 2026

*Responses received later than the specified deadline will be disqualified.

** Pre-Proposal Meeting is strongly encouraged, though it is not mandatory to attend. The Pre-Proposal Meeting will be held virtually via Microsoft Teams on June 10, 2026, at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time. Please see the meeting link, ID, and passcode below.

Pre-Proposal Meeting:

Topic: Assessment Data Management System

Day/Time: June 10, 2026, 10:00 AM Eastern Time (US and Canada)

Join Teams Meeting:

https://teams.microsoft.com/meet/224023154871088?p=eIurxSuMWQmON2eD6N

Meeting ID: 224 023 154 871 088

Passcode: 6U3tZ6Rj

Selected Proposers may be required to participate in interviews and/or make oral presentations. Failure of a Proposer to participate on the date scheduled may result in the rejection of the Proposer’s proposal. In addition, Wayne RESA may decide to make site visits to the selected Proposers’ reference sites or other sites provided by the Proposer.

Wayne RESA reserves the right to change this schedule as needed and all information provided by Wayne RESA in this RFP is offered in good faith. Individual items are subject to change at any time. Wayne RESA makes no certification that any item is without error.

The Sole Point of Contact During this Solicitation Process is:

Stacey Shaw

purchasing@resa.net

(989) 307-1307

Contacts with Wayne RESA Personnel: All contact with Wayne RESA regarding this RFP or any matter relating thereto must be sent to the following email: purchasing@resa.net

Electronic forms of all bid documents are available online at: Wayne RESA Bid Documents

If you experience any issues downloading the documents, contact Stacey Shaw at purchasing@resa.net

Award of this proposal is contingent upon the approval of funding from Wayne RESA Board of Education.

Table of Contents

Solicitation Terms and Conditions can be found at https://www.resa.net/administrative-support/purchasing/request-for-proposal as (DOC) CoPro+ Contract Terms and Conditions

SECTION 1.0 – PROPOSER RESPONSES TO SCOPE OF WORK AND PRICING

PROPOSAL RESPONSE GUIDELINES

The following are detailed guidelines for the format and content of your proposal submission. Please review the guidelines below in full prior to beginning your proposal.

Please respond to each requirement or question where necessary and explain how it will fulfill each requirement. Attach any supplemental information and appropriately reference the section within your response.

IMPORTANT NOTE: There are specific requirements for which acceptance must be simply acknowledged through a checkbox(es), and others that require further explanation. Click one checkbox and complete the entries as identified.

Proposal Section I – Executive Summary

This part of the response to the RFP should be limited to a brief narrative highlighting the supplier’s proposal. The summary should contain as little technical jargon as possible and should be oriented toward non-technical personnel. The summary should describe the following:

• Key differentiators in service offerings, account management, and value-added services proposed by your company.

• Your understanding of the scope of requirements and the level to which your proposal has met the requirements.

• High-level project execution plan and timeline for completion, outlining any equipment delays that could impact availability.

• Risk management considerations.

• Value and outcomes delivered to WRESA

Proposal Section II - Scope of Proposed Solution

Provide a description of the overall solution or methodology for an Assessment Data Management System. Include a high-level description of the steps of how the services will be provided and any associated value-added services/solution that meets the requirements. Confirm that the solution being provided is comprehensive. In addition, describe the methodology for solution delivery. Finally, describe the client relationship management approach (e.g., steering committee, status reporting).

Proposal Section III - Comprehensive List of Assumptions

Rather than have assumptions scattered throughout the proposal, WRESA requires that all assumptions be listed and explained in this section. Please ensure that all assumptions listed reference the appropriate section of the RFP and/or associated services.

1.1 Minimum Mandatory Requirements

All proposals will be reviewed for compliance with the minimum mandatory requirements. Proposals deemed non-responsive will be eliminated from further consideration.

Interested and qualified proposers that can demonstrate their ability to successfully provide the services requested under this RFP are invited to submit proposal(s), provided they meet the following:

1. Must have a minimum of three (3) years of experience within the last five (5) years providing high quality assessment data management and reporting. Enter in Section 2.2 References.

1.2 Introduction and Background

Wayne RESA, established by the Michigan Legislature in 1960, is the largest of fifty-six (56) such agencies throughout the state. The Wayne RESA board is elected by one vote from each of the thirty-three (33) local Wayne County school district boards. WRESA provides a wide variety of services to thirty-three (33) public school districts and approximately ninety-seven (97) public school academies in Wayne County, Michigan; serving more than 260,000 students. WRESA, through various consortium arrangements, provides a variety of services to other educational agencies throughout the state of Michigan.

1.3 Scope of Work

WRESA is requesting proposals for an Assessment Data Management System. The objective of this project is to offer a comprehensive data management and reporting platform for districts to securely collect and store assessment data and generate reports. The system will integrate with the district's Student Information System (SIS) and the Michigan Data Hub, and third party benchmark assessment entities, enabling districts to consolidate student data and perform detailed analytics. The project emphasizes improving efficiency, transparency, educator collaboration, and compliance, while also addressing the specific challenges districts encounter when reporting data to school boards and the community.

1.3.1 Project Context and System Environment

The proposed Assessment Data Management System must integrate with existing Student Information Systems (SIS), specifically:

• MISTAR (primary system supported by Wayne RESA).

• PowerSchool (used by select districts; however, Wayne RESA provides support for MISTAR only).

The system will support multiple use cases, including but not limited to:

• Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS).

• Creation and administration of classroom and district-wide benchmark assessments

• Broader district and ISD data reporting, analytics, and decision-making.

Implementation Timeline:

PHASE	ESTIMATED TIMELINE	TYPICAL ACTIVITES
Sign Contract	August 2026	Finalize Contract, Scope, etc.
Discovery & pre-implementation	Sept-Oct 2026	Requirements gathering, stakeholder meetings, data mapping
Technical configuration & Integrations	Nov 2026 -Jan 2027	SIS integrations, SSO, rostering, permissions, dashboards, testing
Training & pilot rollout	Feb-June 2027	Train admins, coaches, teachers; pilot workflows; refine processes
Full Go-Live	July 2027	Production launch for 2027-28
Stabilization / Iteration	July-Sept 2027	Intensive support after launch – and ongoing

Adoption Expectations:

• The system should be scalable to support usage across Wayne RESA and participating districts.

Proposer Response:

☐	I have reviewed the above requirements and agree with no exceptions.
☐	I have reviewed the above requirements and have noted all exception(s) below.
List all exception(s):
Bidder must describe how they comply with the above requirement(s):

1.3.2 Specifications and Requirements

The awarded Contractor (Contractor) must provide a comprehensive solution that includes the following:

A. Training Components

The Contractor must provide a dedicated team for training and professional development on the use of the digital platform either in-person at the school, district, and ISD level or virtual.

1. Any on-demand educator support resources must be readily available.

2. Please explain how you will provide the following along with the estimated timeline:

a. Orientation, implementation, training, and ongoing support for application usage.

b. On-going technical support and customer service.

c. Provide on-site support in Wayne County to individual schools, principals, and teachers/other personnel, ensuring that this is done in conjunction with district level leadership.

Proposer Response:

☐	I have reviewed the above requirements and agree with no exceptions.
☐	I have reviewed the above requirements and have noted all exception(s) below.
List all exception(s):
Bidder must describe how they comply with the above requirement(s):

B. Data Tool Requirements

1. Data Entry & Collection:

d. Simple data entry interface for tracking identified students over multiple record years to support MTSS practices and framework.

e. The system must serve as a centralized longitudinal data warehouse.

f. Longitudinal Cohort Analysis: Technical capability to track specific cohorts of students across multiple years, regardless of changes in school building or grade level, to measure long-term instructional impact.

g. Every twenty-four (24) hours the system must update and sync with the Student Information System (SIS) to ensure student rosters, demographics, course enrollments, special programs data, attendance, behavior, and custom student groups are mirrored accurately within the achievement dashboards.

h. Third-Party Benchmark /uploading with major national benchmark providers (e.g., NWEA MAP, Renaissance Star, i-Ready, Acadience). Data must sync at a minimum frequency of every twenty-four (24) hours during testing windows.

i. Initial data import capabilities from existing systems (CSV format).

j. Activity tracking for user updates to student or record information.

k. Optional email notifications for data additions or updates.

l. Interactive Dashboards: Visualizations must allow for "point-and-click" filtering by demographic, teacher, or grade level.

m. Audit & Logging:

i. System must maintain detailed audit logs of user activity and data changes.

ii. Annual audit log reports must be available upon request.

n. Every twenty-four (24) hours the system must update and sync with the Student Information System (SIS) to ensure that faculty roles and permissions from the SIS are reflected in the roles and permissions in the Assessment Data Management System.

o. Online test and quiz administration with kiosk mode to prevent students from accessing the web during their test.

p. Integrating report card marks from MISTAR and/or PowerSchool.

q. API integration to push assessment results from the Assessment Data Management System to MISTAR Gradebook.

Proposer Response:

☐	I have reviewed the above requirements and agree with no exceptions.
☐	I have reviewed the above requirements and have noted all exception(s) below.
List all exception(s):
Bidder must describe how they comply with the above requirement(s):

2. Custom-Tailored Data Structure:

a. Customizable forms and fields to fit the needs of the state, region, or district.

i. Vendors are to explain the level(s) of customization to their forms and specify any pricing variations in Attachment A – Pricing.

b. Capability for custom setup to track specific information required by the state.

c. State-level custom forms and fields that automatically sync to districts.

d. District-specific customization options.

e. Permission-based ability for District Liaisons to customize their district's needs.

f. Ability to hide fields or forms set at the state level that aren't required by individual districts.

g. Exportable data formats for state-level reporting (ESSA, IDEA…).

i. Please list all exportable data formats offered and specify any pricing variations in Attachment A – Pricing.

h. Custom assessment creation from item bank or custom items.

i. Custom assessment scoring sheet creation for paper-based tests.

Proposer Response:

☐	I have reviewed the above requirements and agree with no exceptions.
☐	I have reviewed the above requirements and have noted all exception(s) below.
List all exception(s):
Bidder must describe how they comply with the above requirement(s):

3. Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS):

a. Supports tracking of students within MTSS tiers and framework

b. Progress Monitoring: Integrated graphing of student progress against goal lines to determine if interventions should be continued or modified.

c. Intervention Fidelity: Tracking tools for intervention duration, frequency, and group size to ensure evidence-based practices are followed.

d. Item Bank Integration: Access to high-quality, standards-aligned item banks for teacher-created assessments.

i. Note: Please provide pricing for both with/without Item Bank Integration on Attachment A – Pricing as some districts will need and some will not.

e. Immediate Feedback: Automated scoring that provides instant qualitative feedback to both students and teachers to adjust instruction mid-lesson.

f. The capability to integration with the State Individual Reading Improvement Plans (IRIPs)

g. Automated Triggers: Ability to auto-generate an IRIP draft when a student falls below "at-risk" thresholds on literacy screeners.

h. Parental Engagement: Features for sharing IRIP goals and progress updates with parents via secure portals or automated mailers

i. Early Warning System - Predictive Indicators: Flags for the "ABCs" (Attendance, Behavior, and Course Performance) that predict future dropout or failure risk.

j. Custom Thresholds: Administrators must be able to define what constitutes "at-risk" (e.g., missing 10% of instructional time).

k. Watchlists: Dynamic lists that notify staff via dashboard alerts when a student meets specific risk criteria.

Proposer Response:

☐	I have reviewed the above requirements and agree with no exceptions.
☐	I have reviewed the above requirements and have noted all exception(s) below.
List all exception(s):
Bidder must describe how they comply with the above requirement(s):

C. Data Security, Compliance & Governance

1. Data Hosting:

a. All data must be hosted on servers physically located within the United States.

2. Regulatory Compliance:

a. The system must strictly comply with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) and all applicable student data privacy laws.

3. Data Encryption:

a. The system must support:

i. Encryption of data at rest.

ii. Encryption of data in transit between district systems and vendor-hosted environments.

4. Security Certifications:

a. Vendors must maintain and provide current certification for:

i. SOC 2 Type II and/or

ii. ISO 27001

5. Data Ownership:

a. All data remains the sole property of the participating district(s). Vendors shall have no ownership rights over the data.

6. Data Retention and Exit Requirements:

a. Upon contract termination:

i. The district retains full ownership of all data.

ii. Vendor must provide complete data export in CSV format.

iii. Vendor must certify secure data destruction within thirty (30) days.

Proposer Response:

☐	I have reviewed the above requirements and agree with no exceptions.
☐	I have reviewed the above requirements and have noted all exception(s) below.
List all exception(s):
Bidder must describe how they comply with the above requirement(s):

D. Reporting & Analytics Requirements

1. System must provide standard and customizable reporting capabilities.

2. Vendor must provide quarterly usage reports to Wayne RESA/ISD.

3. Reports should include user activity, adoption metrics, and system utilization.

Proposer Response:

☐	I have reviewed the above requirements and agree with no exceptions.
☐	I have reviewed the above requirements and have noted all exception(s) below.
List all exception(s):
Bidder must describe how they comply with the above requirement(s):

E. Success Metrics and Outcomes

1. The success of the Assessment Data Management System will be measured by:

a. A minimum 20% reduction in manual data entry by district staff (integrational impacts minimizing manual uploads).

b. Increased staff capacity to focus on data analysis and instructional decision-making.

c. Improved data accessibility and reporting efficiency across districts.

Vendors should describe how their solution supports and measures these outcomes.

Proposer Response:

☐	I have reviewed the above requirements and agree with no exceptions.
☐	I have reviewed the above requirements and have noted all exception(s) below.
List all exception(s):
Bidder must describe how they comply with the above requirement(s):

1.4 Statewide Cooperative Contract

Wayne RESA is working with the CoPro+ cooperative purchasing program on this bid solicitation.  If your bid meets the minimum qualifications, is responsive and responsible, and offers competitive pricing, you may be considered and approached to extend a term agreement and pricing to other public entities within the county, the region, and the state, in accordance with Michigan Compiled Laws 124.504.  This process is called “piggybacking”; it offers tremendous value to public ordering entities regarding the cost and time to manage an end-to-end purchasing event.  This process also offers exceptional value to selected vendors in terms of their company’s resources and time to respond to multiple solicitations from various public entities that have a similar need for their products or services.

All pricing submitted to Wayne RESA and its participating entities shall include a 2% administrative fee to be remitted to CoPro+ by the contractor on a quarterly basis. Administrative fees will be paid against actual sales volume for each quarter. It is the contractor’s responsibility to keep all pricing up to date and on file with Wayne RESA/CoPro+. All price changes shall be presented to Wayne RESA/CoPro+ for acceptance, using the same format as was accepted in the original contract.

Proposer Response:

Please confirm your understanding by checking Yes or No.

☐ Yes ☐ No

1.5 Reserved

1.6 Service Capabilities

1.6.1 Communication Plan/Contract Management

Proposer must identify their company standards of communication as they relate to contract performance, issue management, and change management. An issue is an identified event that, if not addressed, may affect schedule, scope, service, delivery, quality, or budget. A change is identified as a change in corporate leadership, structure, merger or acquisition.

Proposer Response:

Contract Performance: Describe how your company maintains communication to ensure the project stays on schedule, within scope, and aligned with expectations. Issue Management: Outline your process for identifying, addressing and resolving issues that impact the schedule, budget or quality. Change Management: Explain your approach to handling significant organizational changes to ensure continuity during the contract.

1.6.2 Primary Account Representatives

Proposer must identify by name, email address, and phone number for the following:

1. Contract performance – Single point of contact to troubleshoot any and all potential problems or issues.

2. Contract documents – Responsible for signing and negotiating Contract.

3. Reports – Responsible for reports.

Proposer Response:

1. Contact person’s name, email address, and phone number for Contract performance: 2. Contact person’s name, email address, and phone number for Contract documents: 3. Contact person’s name, email address, and phone number for reports:

1.6.3 Reserved

1.7 Customer Service

It is preferred that the Proposer have an accessible customer service department with an individual specifically assigned to Wayne RESA. Customer inquiries should be responded to same business day, unless it is an emergency in which an immediate response is expected. Describe your company’s Customer Service Department (hours of operation, number and location of service centers, regular and emergency response times, etc.).

Proposer Response:

Customer Service Contact: Customer Service Phone#: Hours of Operations: Address: Regular Response Times: Emergency Response Times:

1.7.1 Service Level Agreements (SLAs)

The Contractor must meet the following minimum service levels:

1. System Uptime: Minimum 99.99% uptime, excluding scheduled maintenance.

2. Support Response Times:

a. Critical issues: Response within four (4) business hours.

b. Non-critical issues: Response within one (1) business day.

3. Adoption Metric:

a. At least 75% of participating local districts and Public-School Academies (PSAs) are actively utilizing the system

Vendors must describe how SLAs are monitored, reported, and enforced, including any service credits or penalties.

Proposer Response:

☐	I have reviewed the above requirements and agree with no exceptions.
☐	I have reviewed the above requirements and have noted all exception(s) below.
List all exception(s):
Bidder must describe how they comply with the above requirement(s):

1.8 Purchase Orders

Requests for quotes will be initiated by participating agencies as specific needs arise. Participating agencies will issue individual detailed specifications to the pre-qualified vendor pool along with specific response information required, deliverables, and any special terms and conditions. The vendors will respond directly to the requesting agency within the timeframe specified in the request for quote. The participating agency will evaluate the responses and determine the Proposer that will be awarded a purchase order (PO). Resulting orders are to be shipped and billed directly to these institutions.

Proposer Response:

Please confirm your understanding by checking Yes or No.

☐ Yes ☐ No

1.9 Delivery and Acceptance

The awarded Proposer (Contractor) shall deliver all materials, products, and services per the agreed schedule. Physical materials must be securely packaged and shipped FOB destination, while digital resources must be provided via secure electronic transfer. The Contractor bears all shipping, handling, and packaging costs. Risk of loss remains with the Contractor until final acceptance by WRESA.

Acceptance is contingent upon:

• Conformance to requirements.

• Successful training and implementation as per the Contract.

• Functionality of digital components and system integrations.

If deficiencies are found, the Contractor must correct them within five (5) business days at no additional cost. Non-compliance may result in rejection, withheld payment, or Contract termination if unresolved.

Proposer Response:

1.9.1 Invoice and Payments

All pricing must reflect net 30 payment terms.

Proposer Response:

Please confirm your understanding by checking Yes or No.

☐ Yes ☐ No

1.9.2 Data Governance Requirements

The Contractor must adhere to the following data governance standards:

1. District retains full ownership of all data at all times.

2. Vendor must support full data export capabilities in standard formats (CSV minimum).

3. Vendor must document data retention policies, including backup and archival procedures.

4. Upon termination, vendor must:

• Provide full data export.

• Certify deletion of all district data within 30 days.

Proposer Response:

☐	I have reviewed the above requirements and agree with no exceptions.
☐	I have reviewed the above requirements and have noted all exception(s) below.
List all exception(s):
Bidder must describe how they comply with the above requirement(s):

1.10 Criminal Background Check

WRESA is committed to providing a safe and secure environment for all staff, students, and clients that conduct business or visit any WRESA operated campus. Prior to any individual servicing WRESA-operated campuses, WRESA reserves the right to conduct a criminal history records check in accordance with state law. Individuals seeking access to WRESA operated campuses will be held to a similar standard of review as WRESA employees and contractors, including the requirement that any criminal conviction will require the individual to provide requested documentation so that WRESA can conduct a targeted review and individualized assessment. Background checks must be fully completed prior to starting work on any WRESA campus, and only individuals authorized in writing by Wayne RESA utilizing a DETERMINATION FOR ASSIGNMENT form will be accepted as qualified for placement.

If conducted, Proposer will be responsible for working with WRESA to run proper background checks. WRESA will process background checks for a fee of seventy-five dollars ($75.00) for each CHRI record initiated by the Proposer. The Proposer is responsible for all processing costs and fees associated with background checks, including WRESA processing fees. Wayne RESA shall issue an invoice to the Proposer detailing the fees owed to Wayne RESA during each month of the Term. The Proposer must remit payment within thirty (30) days of receipt of such invoice. Any invoices unpaid after that thirty (30) day period shall be deducted from amounts due from WRESA to the Proposer.

Proposer Response:

☐	I have reviewed the above requirements and agree with no exceptions.
☐	I have reviewed the above requirements and have noted all exception(s) below.
List all exception(s):

1.11 Pricing Schedule

Respondents will provide pricing information on the price sheet (Attachment A) that will be utilized when evaluating price competitiveness.

1.11.1 RESERVED

1.11.2 Bid Pricing

Proposers have the option to provide high-volume pricing. Proposers who offer high-volume pricing may be evaluated more favorably than those who do not. Proposers should specify this discount option within their cost proposal and at what level.

1.11.3 Quantity Term

Proposer agrees to supply the complete quantity and products that each customer requires.

1.11.4 Tax Excluded from Price

(a) Sales Tax: Wayne RESA and local units of government are exempt from sales tax for direct purchases. The Proposer's prices must not include sales tax.

(b) Federal Excise Tax: Wayne RESA may be exempt from Federal Excise Tax, or the taxes may be reimbursable, if articles purchased under any resulting Contract are used for Wayne RESA's exclusive use. Certificates showing exclusive use for the purposes of substantiating a tax-free, or tax-reimbursable sale will be sent upon request. If a sale is tax exempt or tax reimbursable under the Internal Revenue Code, the Proposer's prices must not include the Federal Excise Tax.

Proposer Response:

Include any comments regarding pricing, discounts being offered, and information on other cooperative contracts held by respondent.

1.12 Price Assurance

The awarded Proposer agrees to provide pricing to Wayne RESA and its participating entities that are the lowest pricing available, and the pricing shall remain so throughout the duration of the contract. The awarded Proposer agrees to promptly lower the cost of any product purchased through Wayne RESA following a reduction in the manufacturer or publisher's direct cost. If respondent has existing cooperative contracts in place, Wayne RESA requests equal or better than pricing to be submitted.

All pricing submitted to Wayne RESA shall include a 2% administrative/remittance fee to be remitted to CoPro+ by the awarded Proposer. It is the awarded Proposer’s responsibility to keep all product listings up to date and on file with Wayne RESA/CoPro+.

Proposer Response:

Please confirm your understanding by checking Yes or No.

☐ Yes ☐ No

SECTION 2.0 – PROPOSER INFORMATION AND ACCEPTANCE

1. The undersigned declares that the bid documents, including, without limitation, any RFP Addenda and Exhibits have been read.

The undersigned is authorized, offers, and agrees to furnish the articles and/or services specified in accordance with the Specifications, Terms & Conditions of the bid documents of this RFP.

2. The undersigned has reviewed the bid documents and fully understands the requirements in this bid and that each proposer who is awarded a contract shall be, in fact, a prime contractor, not a subcontractor, and agrees that its bid, if accepted by Wayne RESA, will be the basis for the Proposer to enter into a contract with Wayne RESA in accordance with the intent of the bid documents.

3. The undersigned acknowledges receipt and acceptance of all addenda.

4. The undersigned agrees to the following terms, conditions, certifications, and requirements listed in Section 2.3:

● Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion

● Certification Regarding Nondiscrimination Under Federally and State Assisted Programs

● Assurance Regarding Access to Records and Financial Statements

● Iran Economic Sanctions Act

● Familial Relationship Disclosure

● Certificate of Independent Price Determination

● Certifications/Disclosure Requirements Related to Lobbying

● U.S. Department of Energy Assurance of Compliance Non-Discrimination in Federally Assisted Programs

5. The undersigned acknowledges that proposer will be in good standing in the State of Michigan, with all the necessary licenses, permits, certifications, approvals, and authorizations necessary to perform all obligations in connection with this RFP and associated bid documents.

6. It is the responsibility of each proposer to be familiar with all of the specifications, terms and conditions and, if applicable, the site conditions. By the submission of a bid, the proposer certifies that if awarded a contract they will make no claim against Wayne RESA based upon ignorance of conditions or misunderstanding of the specifications.

7. Patent indemnity: Vendors who do business with the Wayne RESA shall hold Wayne RESA, its officers, agents and employees, harmless from liability of a nature or kind, including cost and expenses, for infringement or use of any patent, copyright or other proprietary right, secret process, patented or unpatented invention, article or appliance furnished or used in connection with the contract or purchase order.

8. Insurance certificates are not required at the time of submission. However, if awarded, the Contractor agrees to meet the minimum insurance requirements posted in the terms and conditions. This documentation must be provided to Wayne RESA, prior to award, and shall include an insurance certificate and additional insured certificate, naming Wayne RESA, which meets the minimum insurance requirements, as stated in the terms and conditions.

2.1 Company Profile

Company Profile

Legal Company Name of Proposer:

Street Address:

City:

State: Zip Code:

Website:

Primary Contact Name:

Primary Contact Phone Number:

Primary Contact Email Address:

Dun & Bradstreet (D&B) Number (if applicable):

Type of Entity/Organization (Corporation, LLC, Non-Profit, etc.):

Has your company been debarred by the Federal and/or State Government? ☐ Yes ☐ No If yes, has it been lifted and if so, when?

Have you ever been in bankruptcy or in reorganization proceedings?

Brief history of your company, including the year it was established:

Signature:

Name and Title of Signer:

Date:

2.2 References

Provide a minimum of three (3) customer references for commodities and/or services of similar scope dating within the past five (5) years. Please identify any experience relevant to the services you propose to provide through this RFP within the Scope of Work:

Entity Name:
Contact Name:	Title:
City:	State:
Phone Number:	Dates of Services:
Description of Services:
Annual Volume:

Entity Name:
Contact Name:	Title:
...