| Location: | Federal |
|---|---|
| Posted: | Apr 8, 2026 |
| Due: | May 6, 2026 |
| Agency: | San Antonio Water System |
| Type of Government: | State & Local |
| Category: |
|
| Solicitation No: | PS-00193-SM |
| Publication URL: | To access bid details, please log in. |
Request for Qualifications
2026 Governmental Engineering Unspecified Contract
The San Antonio Water System (SAWS) is pursuing professional engineering design services and accepting Statements of Qualifications (SOQ) in connection with the 2026 Governmental Engineering Unspecified Contract, which will include the rehabilitation and replacement of small and large diameter water and/or wastewater facilities for unspecified projects which will require a Scope of Services to be performed by a qualified consultant(s) on a work order basis.
It is anticipated that SAWS will select more than one firm for governmental contracts totaling $6 million, as a result of this Request for Qualifications (RFQ). Respondents should have familiarity working on joint bid and non-joint bid SAWS projects within the City of San Antonio (COSA), Bexar County, Texas Department of Transportation (TXDOT), and San Antonio River Authority Right-of-Way (ROW) and other governing agencies.
Estimated Timeline
April 8, 2026 ................................................................................................ RFQ Released
April 16, 2026, at 10:00 a.m. ............................ Non-Mandatory Pre-Submittal Conference
April 23, 2026, by 3:00 p.m. ........................................... Receipt of Written Questions Due
April 30, 2026, by 4:00 p.m. ......................................................... Q & A Posted to Website
May 6, 2026, by 2:00 p.m. ........................................................................... Proposals Due
May 11, 2026....................................................................................... Proposals Evaluated
August 2026 .......................................................... SAWS Board Consideration and Award
August 2026 ............................................................................. Non-Selection Notices sent
August 2026 ........................................................................................................ Start Work
The dates listed above are subject to change without notice.
|
Full RFQ Proposal
Note: You will be prompted to login to access the full proposal document |
|
|
|
Evaluation Criteria Forms Apr. 8, 2026 |
|
Questions? Please contact
Stephen Muniz
at 210-233-2950
|
Receive Email Updates
|
Registration Agreement
Attachment III
Evaluation Criteria Forms
Sub-Consultant Table
Team Experience and Qualifications
When answering the questions below, use only the space provided in this form, unless otherwise indicated. If all fields are not completed, the Respondent is at risk for being rejected due to non-responsiveness. It is not acceptable to indicate “see attached” on this form.
3) Using the table, describe your firm’s most relevant experience. Include a description of the role of any sub-consultants your firm is proposing and their experience. Any firm or sub-consultant experience provided is to be relevant to the Scope of Services requested within this RFQ.
|
Experience Relevant to Scope of Work (I.E.: Trenchless technology, open cut pipeline installation, conducting preliminary archaeological and environmental reviews, etc.) |
|||||||||||
Attachment IV
Evaluation Criteria Form
Project Table
Similar Past Projects and Performance
1) Complete the table provided within the Evaluation Criteria forms identifying three (3) relevant projects of similar Scope of Services that details the entire project life cycle to the projects identified within this RFQ that were completed within the past seven (7) years. Identify key personnel, who are part of the proposed team, and their roles and responsibilities for at least two (2) of the three (3) projects.
Photos can be inserted but could hinder your availability to provide further project description within the allotted page and are not encouraged. Projects in the close-out phase with facilities in service are considered completed.
|
Project #1 Name: |
|||
|
Description. |
|||
|
Key Personnel (to include personnel titles and specific project tasks). |
|||
|
Number of Change Orders (not requested by the Project Owner). |
|||
|
Construction Contract Value: |
Project Owner Name: |
||
|
Project Owner’s Current Phone Number: |
Project Owner’s Current E-mail Address: |
Evaluation Criteria Form: Similar Past Projects and Performance
(continued)
|
Project #2 Name: |
|||
|
Description. |
|||
|
Key Personnel (to include personnel titles and specific project tasks). |
|||
|
Number of Change Orders (not requested by the Project Owner). |
|||
|
Construction Contract Value: |
Project Owner Name: |
||
|
Project Owner’s Current Phone Number: |
Project Owner’s Current E-mail Address: |
Evaluation Criteria Form: Similar Past Projects and Performance
(continued)
|
Project #3 Name: |
|||
|
Description. |
|||
|
Key Personnel (to include personnel titles and specific project tasks). |
|||
|
Number of Change Orders (not requested by the Project Owner). |
|||
|
Construction Contract Value: |
Project Owner Name: |
||
|
Project Owner’s Current Phone Number: |
Project Owner’s Current E-mail Address: |
Attachment V
Evaluation Criteria Form
Opinions of Probable Construction Cost (OPCC) Table
Similar Past Projects and Performance
(continued)
2) Using the table within the Evaluation Criteria form, provide project information for the three (3) projects submitted in section 1) of this criteria, as well as three (3) additional projects that the prime has been involved, as it relates to the accuracy of the OPCC and change orders, comparing the 100% design phase estimate to approved construction awards.
|
Project Name |
100% OPCC – Engineer’s Estimate |
Low Responsive Bidder – Contract Award |
Percent Difference between OPCC and Low Bid |
Number of Bidders |
Average of all other Bids |
Const. Start Date |
Const. Finish Date |
Total Number Change Orders |
Total Change Orders Cost |
Change Orders as % of Contract Award |
|
Project 1 |
$ |
$ |
% |
$ |
$ |
% |
||||
|
Project 2 |
$ |
$ |
% |
$ |
$ |
% |
||||
|
Project 3 |
$ |
$ |
% |
$ |
$ |
% |
||||
|
Project 4 |
$ |
$ |
% |
$ |
$ |
% |
||||
|
Project 5 |
$ |
$ |
% |
$ |
$ |
% |
||||
|
Project 6 |
$ |
$ |
% |
$ |
$ |
% |

With GovernmentContracts, you can: