RFQ 484-082426 GEC and OVF Services for I-75 South Express Lanes PI #0020636

Date Posted: 7/24/2026
Request for Qualifications
To Provide
General Engineering Consultant Services (GEC) Pre-let, Post-let and
Owner's Verification Firm (OVF) for I-75 From I-675 to Locust Grove
Griffin Road - Express Lanes
RFQ 484-082426
Qualifications Due: August 24, 2026
Georgia Department of Transportation
One Georgia Center
600 West Peachtree Street, NW
Atlanta, Georgia 30308

Date Posted: 7/24/2026
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS
I. General Project Information
A. Overview
The Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) is soliciting Statements of Qualifications (SOQs) from
a qualified firm(s) to provide Consultant Services for the projects listed above:
This Request for Qualifications (RFQ) seeks to identify potential providers for the Scope of Services for the
project/contract listed in the Exhibit(s). Firms that respond to this RFQ and are determined by GDOT to
be sufficiently qualified may be deemed eligible and invited to offer a technical approach and/or possibly
present and/or interview for these services. All respondents to this RFQ are subject to the instructions
communicated in this document and are cautioned to completely review the entire RFQ and follow
instructions carefully.
GDOT reserves the right to reject any or all Statements of Qualifications and Technical Approach, and to
waive technicalities and informalities at the discretion of GDOT.
B. Restriction of Communications
From the date of advertisement of this solicitation until the successful respondents are selected and the
award is officially announced, all firms are strictly prohibited from communicating in any way regarding this
solicitation or the associated scope of work with any GDOT staff, including the Commissioner and GDOT
Board Members. This restriction applies to all potential respondents and will be strictly enforced.
The only exception to this restriction is for the purpose of obtaining a Consultant Evaluation Form to
support a project being included in the SOQ submittal.
All questions or requests for clarification regarding any aspect of this RFQ must be submitted in writing via
email to:
Grace Sherman
GrSherman@dot.ga.gov
Deadlines for the submission of questions are listed in the Schedule of Events section of this RFQ.
Method of Communication
All general communication regarding this solicitation, including updates, clarifications, and official
announcements, will be posted to the Georgia Procurement Registry (GPR) under this RFQ. It is the
responsibility of all interested firms to monitor the GPR regularly for such information.
GDOT reserves the right to communicate directly via electronic mail with the primary contact listed in the
submitted Statement of Qualifications (SOQ). Additional communications may be conducted as specified
elsewhere in this RFQ.
C. Contract Term and Type
GDOT anticipates one (1) Multi-Phase, Project Specific Contract to be awarded to one (1) firm, for the
project/contract identified. GDOT anticipates that the Payment Type may be Lump Sum, Cost Plus Fixed
Fee, Cost per Unit of Work, or Specific Rate of Compensation. As a project-specific contract, the
Department intends that the Agreement will remain in effect until successful completion of the project.
D. Contract Amount
The Multi-Phase, Project Specific contract amount will be determined via negotiations with the Department. If
the Department is unable to reach a satisfactory agreement and at reasonable rates to be paid for the
services to be provided, the Department reserves the right to terminate negotiations with the highest scoring
2

Date Posted: 7/24/2026
finalist and begin negotiations with the next highest scoring finalist.
E. Scope of Services
Under the terms of the resulting Agreements, the selected consultants will provide the anticipated scope
of work for each project as outlined in the accompanying Exhibit(s) referenced herein.
F. Schedule of Events
The following Schedule of Events represents GDOT's best estimate of the Schedule that will be followed.
All times indicated are prevailing times in Atlanta, Georgia. GDOT reserves the right to adjust the Schedule
as GDOT deems necessary.
PHASE I DATE TIME
a. GDOT issues a public advertisement for this RFQ. 07/24/2026 --------
b. Deadline for submission of written questions and requests for
08/10/2026 2:00 PM
clarification
c. Deadline for submission of SOQs
08/24/2026 2:00 PM
II. Selection Method
A. Phase I - Selection of Finalists
Based on the SOQs submitted in response to the projects/contracts listed in the Exhibit(s) below,
individual Selection Committee members will evaluate all firms individually based on the Phase I selection
criteria and weights listed in the solicitation. All firms will be discussed and evaluated by the selection
committee as a group and assigned a group rating for each of the Phase I evaluation criteria and weights,
resulting in a group score for Phase I, and the final rankings of the top submittals will be determined. From
the group scores of the top submittals, at least three (3) or more of the most highly qualified consultants
will be shortlisted for additional evaluation.
B. Finalist Notification
Each finalist firm shall be notified by email to participate in Phase II of the evaluation process and informed
of all due dates, additional details, and requirements beyond those provided in the solicitation.
C. Phase II - Evaluation of Final Selection
Based on the Phase II response from the finalist firms, the selection committee members will evaluate and
discuss each finalist firm's submittal based on the Phase II selection criteria and weights listed in the
solicitation and assign a group rating resulting in a group score for Phase II.
D. Final Selection
The Final selection will be determined by carrying the selection committee group scores from Phase I
forward and adding them to the results for Phase II selection committee group scores, together for a total
score. The finalists will be ranked in order of preference. At least three firms will be identified as the most
highly qualified to perform the services listed in the Exhibit(s). Note that there may be separate Selection
Committees for each project/contract listed in the Exhibit(s).
Upon completion of the evaluation process, GDOT will formally award the contract to the top-ranked
firm(s). Following the award, GDOT will initiate negotiations to finalize the terms and conditions of the
contract(s), including the scope, compensation, and fees to be paid.
If a satisfactory agreement cannot be reached with the highest-ranked firm, GDOT will formally terminate
negotiations and may initiate discussions with the next highest-ranked firm, continuing in order of ranking
3

Date Posted: 7/24/2026
until a mutual agreement is established and the contract is executed.
III. Selection Criteria and Weights
A. Phase I - The following criteria and weights will be utilized in the evaluation and scoring of Phase I
SOQs to determine which firms are shortlisted:
1. Project Manager, Key Team Leader(s), and Key Team Member - Experience and Qualifications
Weight: 30% - Evaluation will be based on the relevant experience, professional qualifications, and
technical expertise of the proposed Project Manager, Key Team Leader(s), and Key Team member for
the identified scope of work.
2. Additional Resources and Challenges Weight: 20% - This criterion considers the firm on its Additional
Resources and Approach to address scope challenges.
3. Prime Consultant Experience and Past Performance Weight: 10% - Past performance will be assessed
using the evaluation forms submitted by the firm and any relevant experience or project knowledge
held by members of the Selection Committee, particularly regarding similar or related GDOT projects.
B. Phase II - The following criteria and weights will be utilized in the evaluation and scoring of the
shortlisted firms (finalists): Technical Approach.
1. Technical Approach Weight: 40% - This criterion evaluates the firm's proposed methodology,
understanding of the project requirements, approach to managing key tasks, anticipated challenges,
and strategies for delivering a successful project outcome.
2. Presentation/Interview: GDOT reserves the right to request a presentation/interview on any
project/contract as determined in its best interests; however, this additional requirement shall typically
be reserved for the most complex projects.
Phase I accounts for 60% of the total score, and Phase II accounts for 40% of the total score.
IV. Instructions for Content and Preparation of Statement of Qualifications - Phase I
Response
The SOQs submittal must be submitted per the instructions provided below and be organized, categorized
using the same headings (in red), numbered and lettered exactly as outlined below, and responsive to all
requested information. For the sections in which page number limits are stated, each section with a stated limit
must begin on a new page and end on the last page allowed for the section. New sections shall not begin on
a page allowed for a previous section, if applicable. This will enable the Department to ensure compliance
with the page limitations.
Restrictions on Inclusion of GDOT Employees and Personnel Disclosure
Respondents may reference current Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) employees within the
Prime Consultant Experience and Past Performance sections of the SOQ (Sections E and F), including within
project descriptions, evaluation forms, and narratives, where applicable. Such references shall be limited to
the individual's role on the referenced project and shall not imply participation on the proposing team or
involvement in the current procurement.
Respondents shall not list, reference, or otherwise include any current GDOT employee as part of the proposed
team, including but not limited to resumes, organizational charts, narratives, or proposed team roles. The
inclusion of any current GDOT employee as part of the proposed team shall render the SOQ non-responsive.
Respondents must also ensure that all individuals identified in the SOQ have been informed of, and have
agreed to, their inclusion on the proposed team. Respondents shall not list employees of other firms-including
potential sub-consultants or unaffiliated entities-without those individuals' knowledge and the concurrence of
their current employer.
4

Date Posted: 7/24/2026
To ensure transparency and avoid conflicts of interest, Respondents must clearly identify the current employer
of all individuals proposed in the SOQ, including the Project Manager, Key Team Leaders, Key Team
Members, all individuals shown on the organizational chart, and any individual referenced in the SOQ narrative
or resumes. Failure to comply with these requirements shall result in a determination of non-responsiveness
Cover page - Each project/contract submittal must have a separate cover page for each copy of each Phase
I submittal and must indicate the response is for Phase I, and each project/contract must list the
RFQ Number, RFQ Title, proposing firm's full legal name, and the specific project contract
being submitted, including the District/Region/County(ies), and Project Description
A. Addendum(s) - Signed cover page (Only) of any Addendum(s) issued.
B. Basic Company Information
The following general information is required for each submittal. This information will not be scored but may
be used by the Department to determine eligibility for selection. Firms must submit only the requested
information. Providing additional or unsolicited information may result in disqualification from this
solicitation.
1. Company Name: Provide the full legal name of the company.
2. Company Headquarters Address: Include the complete address of the company's headquarters.
3. Primary Contact Information: Provide the name, telephone number(s), and email address of the
individual who will serve as the main point of contact for this solicitation. This individual will receive all
communications from the Department.
4. Company Website: Include the company's website URL, if available.
5. Georgia Office Locations: Identify all office locations within the State of Georgia, including full
addresses.
6. Staffing in Georgia Offices: List the number of staff members employed at each Georgia office and
specify their disciplines.
7. Ownership Structure: Indicate the form of ownership (e.g., sole proprietorship, partnership, corporation,
limited liability company, or other structure). Include the state of residency or incorporation and the
number of years the firm has been in business.
This information is (Excluded from the page count).
C. Experience and Qualifications
1. Project Manager - The following information must be provided for the proposed Project Manager. This
section is critical for evaluating qualifications and project relevance. Resumes and supporting
documentation must be clearly labeled and organized.
a. Current Employment
1) State the name of the firm where the Project Manager is currently employed.
2) Indicate the number of years the Project Manager has been with the firm.
3) Provide the total number of years of experience serving in the role of a Project Manager, to
distinguish between overall career length and actual leadership experience directly relevant to
the position.
b. Education: List relevant degrees or academic credentials.
c. Registration, if applicable and necessary for the position.
d. Relevant Project Management Experience: Provide a combination of narrative and listing of specific
experience managing on-call contracts or multiple projects of similar complexity, size, scope, and
function, and experience managing internal and sub-consultant resources to staff projects on an
as-needed basis.
e. GDOT-Specific Experience: Describe experience utilizing GDOT-specific procedures, policies, and
guidance such as the Plan Development Process (PDP), Design Policy Manual, Environmental
Procedures Manual, etc. If any listed projects did not follow GDOT processes, clearly identify the
alternative processes, manuals, or guidance used and provide a comparison where appropriate.
This information is limited to two (2) pages maximum.
2. Key Team Leaders are defined as individuals who oversee project areas deemed critical to each
5

Date Posted: 7/24/2026
specific project (see Section 6 of the Project Description in Exhibit(s) below for the required Key Team
Leader roles per project). For each Key Team Leader identified, the following information must be
provided:
a. Current Employment and Experience:
1) State the name of the firm where the Key Team Leader is currently employed.
2) Indicate the number of years with the firm.
3) Provide the total years of experience serving in a leadership role within their discipline.
b. Education: List relevant degrees or academic credentials.
c. Registration: Provide details of applicable licenses or registrations required for the Key Team
Leader's area of responsibility (e.g., PE, RLA, PG), if necessary and applicable.
d. Relevant Resource Area Experience: Describe the Key Team Leader's relevant experience in their
specific resource area, highlighting involvement in projects of comparable complexity, size, scope,
and function.
e. Experience with GDOT-Specific Standards, detailing the Key Team Leader's use of GDOT-
specific processes, manuals, and guidance relevant to their discipline (e.g., PDP, Design Policy
Manual, Environmental Procedures Manual, etc.) For any projects that did not follow GDOT
processes, list the alternative processes, manuals, or standards used and explain their
comparability.
The information required for each Key Team Leader, as identified in Section 6 of each Project
Exhibit, is limited to one (1) page maximum per individual.
Respondents submitting more than one (1) page for any Key Team Leader will be subject to
disqualification. Additionally, respondents must provide only the Key Team Leaders specified in the
Project Exhibit(s). Submitting more Key Team Leaders than required will be considered non-
compliant and may result in disqualification, as it provides an unfair advantage over firms that followed
the stated requirements. Conversely, failure to submit all required Key Team Leaders will render the
proposal nonresponsive, and the respondent's team will be deemed unqualified for the award. It is
the respondent's responsibility to carefully review Section 6 of the relevant Exhibit(s) and ensure strict
compliance with both the number and content of Key Team Leader submittals.
3. Key Team Member is defined as an individual team member not included as the Project Manager or
a Key Team Leader, whose qualifications the Prime firm would like to highlight as essential in the
delivery of the proposed project/contract. For the Key Team Member identified, the following
information must be provided:
a. Current Employment and Experience:
1) State the name of the firm where the Key Team Member is currently employed.
2) Indicate the number of years with the firm.
3) Provide the total years of experience serving in a leadership role within their discipline.
b. Education: List relevant degrees or academic credentials.
c. Registration: Provide details of applicable licenses or registrations required for the Key Member area
of responsibility (e.g., PE, RLA, PG), if necessary and applicable.
d. Relevant Resource Area Experience: Describe the Key Team Member's relevant experience in
their specific resource area, highlighting involvement in projects of comparable complexity, size,
scope, and function.
e. Narrative discussing why the inclusion of the Key Team Member is important in the overall delivery
of the project/Contract.
f. Experience with GDOT-Specific Standards, Detail the Key Team Member's use of GDOT-specific
processes, manuals, and guidance relevant to their discipline (e.g., PDP, Design Policy Manual,
Environmental Procedures Manual, etc.) For any projects that did not follow GDOT processes, list
the alternative processes, manuals, or standards used and explain their comparability.
The information is limited to one (1) page Maximum.
4. NOTE: Key Personnel Changes
Shortlisted firms may provide information regarding any Project Manager or Key Team Leader
changes occurring after the RFQ submission deadline as part of their Technical Approach submittal.
If a Project Manager or Key Team Leader listed in the SOQ is no longer employed with the firm, a
replacement may be submitted. The replacement must be selected from within the same firm. All
6

Date Posted: 7/24/2026
required information for the replacement personnel must be provided and must comply with the original
page limitations. During the Phase II evaluation meeting, the evaluation team will revisit and adjust the
Phase I score to reflect the experience and qualifications of the replacement personnel. If no personnel
changes have occurred, no response is required for this section.
.
D. Additional Resources and Challenges
Overall Resources - Provide information regarding the overall resources dedicated to delivering the
specific project, including:
1. Organizational Chart - Provide an organizational chart that identifies the Project Manager, Prime
Consultant, Key Team Leaders, support personnel, and reporting structure. This chart is (Excluded
from the page count) and may be submitted in portrait or landscape orientation on (8.5" X 11") or (11"
x 17") paper, particularly when the Chart requires a large consultant team.
2. Primary Office - Identify and discuss the primary office responsible for managing the specific project.
Include the number and types of staff within that office and describe how this office will benefit the
project and promote efficiency. This information must be included on one (1) page, combined with the
Narrative on Additional Resource Areas and Abilities described in Section D.3.
3. Narrative on Additional Resource Areas and Ability - Provide a narrative describing any additional
resource areas important to the project. Discuss how the key areas will integrate and work together,
and include any pertinent information relevant to these areas. The narrative should also explain how
the team's organization-including the Project Manager, Key Team Leaders, and Key Team Member
will support project delivery on schedule, given their current workload capacity. GDOT acknowledges
that some individuals may meet schedule requirements while managing heavier workloads.
Respondents may highlight the strengths and advantages of their team and explain how the team's
capabilities will help meet the proposed schedule outlined in the applicable Exhibit(s). If no schedule
is provided, discuss how the team's composition will support the project moving forward as
expeditiously as possible. Note: Respondents submitting more than one (1) page combined for
Sections D.2 and D.3 will be subject to disqualification.
4. Identify Additional Resources - Respondents are allowed one (1) page to provide information on
additional resources, outside of the Project Manager, Key Team Leaders, and Key Team Member,
providing a brief description of the resource and describing how the additional resources identified will
help address scope challenges. Respondents submitting more than one (1) page will be subject to
disqualification.
E. Prime Consultant Experience and Past Performance
Provide detailed descriptions of the Prime Consultant's past performance on task order-based,
Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ), or similar contract experience that demonstrates the
firm's ability to manage and deliver a variety of assignments that differ in scope, schedule, and
complexity. Emphasize experience that highlights the ability to manage multiple concurrent
assignments, respond quickly to evolving priorities, coordinate effectively across teams, and
consistently meet quality, budget, and schedule requirements.
1. Similar Project Experience - Provide information on the prime consultant's experience and ability to
deliver effective services for projects of similar complexity, size, scope, and function, demonstrating
the firm's qualifications to perform services for GDOT. For each project listed, include the following
details:
a. Project: Provide the project name, GDOT PI number (if applicable), and project location.
b. Client: State the name of the client.
c. Date: Indicate the start and end dates of service. If the project is ongoing, please note that
accordingly.
d. Description: Provide a brief description of the overall project and clearly define the services your
firm performed.
e. Overall/Firm Budget: Include the overall project budget (total of PE, ROW, UTL, CST costs) and the
firm's total fees.
f. Client Contact: Provide current contact information for the client, including contact name(s),
telephone number(s), and e-mail address(es).
g. Team Involvement: Specify the involvement of the Project Manager, Key Team Leaders, and Key
Team Member (if applicable) identified in your SOQ on each project listed.
h. Similarity: Explain why this project is similar to the project(s) for which the firm is submitting a
7

Date Posted: 7/24/2026
proposal.
i. If applicable. If performance ratings are not available, provide a brief explanation.
2. Similar Project Experience Summary Write-up For the similar projects listed above, provide a summary
write-up detailing the firm's experience utilizing GDOT-specific processes, manuals, or guidance, such
as the Plan Development Process (PDP), Design Policy Manual, Environmental Procedures Manual,
and other applicable resources. If any projects did not follow GDOT processes, clearly identify the
alternative processes, manuals, or guidance that were used and explain their comparability to GDOT
standards.
This information is limited to four (4) pages maximum.
F. Prime Consultant Evaluation Forms - Respondents must submit a completed Project Evaluation Form
for each project referenced in the Similar Project Experience section. The form must be the most current
version of the Contract Management Information System (CMIS) Evaluation Form, printed directly from
CMIS for the respective project, and included in the SOQ submittal.
Evaluation Forms shall be submitted in the following order of preference: (1) CMIS Evaluation Form; (2)
Locally Administered Project (LAP) Evaluation Form, if applicable; and (3) Legacy Evaluation Form when
neither a CMIS nor LAP Evaluation Form is available for the referenced project.
If neither a CMIS nor a Locally Administered Project (LAP) Evaluation Form is available, respondents shall
complete and include the Legacy Evaluation Form provided with the RFQ on the Georgia Procurement
Registry.
For projects with non-Georgia clients, respondents may submit another agency's performance evaluation
form in place of the CMIS, LAP, or Legacy Evaluation Forms, provided the submitted form includes
comparable evaluation criteria (e.g., quality, timeliness, cost management, and communication) and
clearly identifies the project, the firm's role, and the evaluator. GDOT reserves the right to request
additional information or clarification if the submitted form does not provide sufficient detail for evaluation.
Firms may submit project experience performed as a subconsultant when proposing as the Prime
Consultant; however, the firm's role and responsibilities on the project must be clearly defined in the SOQ.
The Prime Consultant shall not include or rely upon work performed by other firms or subconsultants in
which the Prime Consultant had no direct involvement.
Evaluation Forms shall be completed by individuals with direct knowledge and oversight of the referenced
project (e.g., Project Manager or responsible supervising official) and are independent of the Evaluation
Committee.
Note: GDOT will no longer issue reference requests via email or Microsoft Forms. It is the sole
responsibility of the respondent to obtain and include all required evaluation forms with the SOQ submittal.
Failure to provide the required Evaluation Forms for each referenced project may result in a lower
evaluation rating for the Similar Project Experience factor.
The Project Evaluation Form assesses the consultant's performance on a specific project, focusing on key
performance indicators such as:
1. Project Quality
2. Timeliness
3. Cost Management
4. Communication
5. Overall, Client Satisfaction
These evaluations serve as a record of the consultant's effectiveness, professionalism, and ability to meet
project objectives and deadlines. The Department reserves the right to randomly validate any submitted
project evaluations by contacting the evaluators listed on the forms.
This information is excluded from the page count.
8

Date Posted: 7/24/2026
G. Area Class Prequalification Requirements:
1. Summary Table.
2. Notice of Professional Consultant Qualifications.
Respondents must complete a table indicating the firm (Prime Consultant or Subconsultant) that meets
each required GDOT Area Class for each project/ Exhibit. The applicable Area Classes are listed in each
Exhibit Section 4.
3. Definitions:
a. Prime Consultant: The firm submitting the Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) and the entity with
whom GDOT will contract.
b. Team: The Prime Consultant and any Subconsultants and/or joint venture partners included in the
SOQ. The Team (either the Prime Consultant or one or more of their Subconsultant team
members) must be prequalified by GDOT in all Area Classes required for each project/Exhibit.
4. Instructions for completing the Summary Table:
a. Place an "X" in the appropriate column to identify whether the Prime Consultant or a
Subconsultant holds each required Area Class.
b. Only include Area Classes that apply to the specific project.
c. Highlighted Area Classes required for the Prime Consultant, as specified in Exhibit Section 4.
d. Ensure that the Prequalification Expiration Date is valid and current at the time of submission.
e. For each required Area Class, only one (1) "X" shall be placed within the Area Class column to
identify the firm being relied upon to satisfy that Area Class requirement. Multiple firms shall not
be identified within the same Area Class column on the Summary Table.
f. Refer to an example of the required Area Class Summary Table below:
Failure to demonstrate valid prequalification for all required Area Classes will result in disqualification.
Certificate
Primes and Subconsultants
Expires
9
)a(60.1 )b(60.1 )c(60.1 )d(60.1 )e(60.1 )f(60.1 )g(60.1
70.1 01.1
Firm Name(s) (Prime) MM/DD/YYYY X X X X X
(Insert Sub Name) MM/DD/YYYY X
(Insert Sub Name) MM/DD/YYYY X X
(Insert Sub Name) MM/DD/YYYY X
5. The proposed project team must meet the Area Class requirements listed in the Exhibit(s) for each
project at the time SOQs are due. GDOT will conduct pre-screening of all potential shortlisted teams
to verify that the proposed team meets the required Area Class(es). If the required Area Class(es) are
not met, the team will be disqualified from further consideration.
6. If a team member's prequalification is scheduled to expire before the SOQ due date, the respondent
must provide documentation confirming that a renewal application has been submitted prior to the
SOQ due date. It is the consultant's responsibility to maintain current prequalification certifications in
accordance with the GDOT Prequalification Manual throughout the procurement process to remain
eligible for award.
7. If the highest-ranking firm does not meet the required Area Class(es), the Department reserves the right
to award the contract to the next highest-ranking firm that meets all Area Class requirements.
8. The Area Class Summary Table (Excluded from the page count) may be submitted in portrait or
landscape orientation on (8.5" X 11") or (11" x 17") paper, particularly when the Area Class Table
requires an extensive list of area classes or a large consultant team, plus one (1) page for each team
member's Notice of Professional Consultant Qualifications.
9. The Area Class Summary Table is intended solely to demonstrate compliance with the required Area
Class requirements. Additional resources, overlapping capabilities, and multiple firms possessing the

Date Posted: 7/24/2026
same Area Class may be identified through the Organizational Chart and other SOQ narrative
sections.
V. Instructions for Preparing Technical Approach - Phase II Response
The following information will only be requested of the shortlisted firms. The Selection Committee will evaluate
the shortlisted firms using the information provided as requested below (NOTE: Scores from Phase I will be
carried forward to Phase II):
The Phase II response must be submitted following the instructions provided below and must be
organized, categorized using the same headings (in red), numbered and
lettered exactly as outlined below, and responsive to all requested information. For the sections in which
page number limits are stated, each section with a stated limit must begin on a new page and end on the last
page allowed for the section. It is not allowed to begin new sections on a page allowed for a previous section,
if applicable. This will enable the Department to ensure compliance with the page limitations.
Phase II Cover page - Each submittal must have a separate cover page for each copy of each Phase II
submittal. Each must indicate the response is for Phase II, list the RFQ Number, RFQ
Title, proposing firm's full legal name, and the specific project contract being
submitted, including the District/Region/County(ies), and Project Description.
A. Administrative Requirements
Each submittal will require a certification to allow the Department to analyze risks in determining if any Firm
should be ineligible for the award. The certification shall cover a wide variety of information. Any firm that
responds in any potentially concerning manner must provide additional information as directed herein for
consideration by GDOT to determine if the Firm is eligible for an award.
1. Certification Form - Complete the Certification Form and provide a notarized original within the firm's
Statement of Qualifications. This is to be submitted for Prime ONLY.
2. Georgia Security and Immigration Compliance Act Affidavit - Complete the form and provide a
notarized original within the firm's Statement of Qualifications. This is to be submitted for Prime ONLY.
3. Addendum(s) - Signed cover page of any Addenda issued to shortlisted firms. This is to be
submitted for the Prime ONLY.
B. Technical Approach
1. Technical approach to assigning and managing services performed by sub-consultants.
2. Firm's detailed approach to assisting the Department in meeting Performance Measures, including, but not
limited to, project closeout, contractual review times, and completing construction projects within budget
and on schedule.
3. Ability to gather resources in the contract area, knowledge of the contract area, and ability to move,
balance, and reallocate resources within the contract area.
4. Provide any unique challenges of the project/contract and how your firm intends to mitigate these
challenges, including quality control and quality assurance procedures.
5. Ability to manage the project from Field Plan Review through project closeout, including varying staff
types and levels depending on the needs of the project.
6. Provide any specific qualifications, skills, or knowledge that your firm has that could benefit the
contract and subsequent projects.
This information will be limited to a maximum of three (3) pages.
C. Key Personnel Changes (if applicable)
Shortlisted firms may provide information regarding any Project Manager or Key Team Leader changes
occurring after the RFQ submission deadline as part of their Technical Approach submittal. If a Project
Manager or Key Team Leader listed in the SOQ is no longer employed with the firm, a replacement may
be submitted. The replacement must be selected from within the same firm. All required information for
the replacement personnel must be provided and must comply with the original page limitations. During
the Phase II evaluation meeting, the evaluation team will revisit and adjust the Phase I score to reflect the
experience and qualifications of the replacement personnel. If no personnel changes have occurred, no
10