Request for Proposals
for
City of Hopkins Comprehensive Housing
Needs Assessment and Strategic Funding Plan
Issued On: January 26, 2026
Due On: February 27, 2026
Page | 1
Scope of Work
I. Background and Purpose
The City of Hopkins, population 19,079, is a Charter City with a City Council/City
Manager form of government. The City Council consists of a Mayor and four
Council Members elected at-large. All policy and legislative decisions are the
responsibility of the Council. The Council delegates the administrative duties to
the City Manager who is responsible for hiring and managing City Staff and
carrying out the policies of the Council. The City has a Housing and
Redevelopment Authority (HRA) which is comprised of the City Council
members.
The City has continually reaffirmed a commitment to support a range of housing
options that are affordable at varying income levels and engage
underrepresented populations: communities of color and the rental community,
as identified in the 2025 Strategic Plan. In 2024, the City Council established the
goal of exploring additional affordable housing policies & programs utilizing new
funds made available through the creation of an Affordable Housing Trust Fund
(AHTF) and Local Affordable Housing Assistance (LAHA).
The City has received $641,916 in LAHA funds to date. The City established an
Affordable Housing Trust Fund in 2025 with an initial seed balance of $150,000
and a $150,000 matching grant from Minnesota Housing. The 2026 HRA levy is
set at the maximum at $551,750, however this levy does not directly support
housing programs and is used for other initiatives.
The City of Hopkins has a very unique set of opportunities and challenges when
it comes to residential preservation and development. Hopkins is a fully
developed city classified as an Urban Center by the Metropolitan Council, with a
wide mix of housing choices. The investment of the Green Line Extension (GLE)
and Hopkins’ location in the southwest Metro has fueled redevelopment of new
housing, including several 100% affordable developments (Vista 44, Chorus
Apartments, Burnes Building) and some 100% market rate developments
(Ovation, Hallon I & II, Moline), but no mixed-income developments to date. The
City adopted an Inclusionary Housing Policy in 2024, requiring 10% of the units
be affordable at 60% AMI or 5% at 50% AMI. The policy has yet to be applied to a
traditional development proposal and we are unsure if it will result in a greater
need to provide public subsidies for new development projects.
Page | 2
Unlike most cities, the majority of residents are renters and most of our rental
housing is affordable today. However, the majority of the affordable rental
housing is Naturally Occurring Affordable Housing (NOAH) and not guaranteed
to remain affordable. The City has explored some preservation tools, such as
low-income rental classification program, but the cost due to tax base loss, is a
concern. Hopkins has one of the highest tax rates in Hennepin County and
shifting more tax burden onto other property is not ideal.
Hopkins’ single family, townhome and condominium market is strong but with
limited inventory and a resurgence in the popularity of walkable, bikeable
communities with vibrant downtown areas, property values are increasing at a
significant pace, and many are getting priced out of homeownership. Rising
property values and the subsequent taxes may also force many existing
homeowners to sell and move from the community.
According to the most recent data available (ACS 2023):
• Approximately 37% of city residents own homes, while 63% rent.
• Median single family home value is $350,000.
• Hopkins is approximately 63% white, and 37% Black, Indigenous, People of
Color (BIPOC).
• The median household income is $71,000 compared to $96,339 in Hennepin
County as a whole.
Additional demographic information on the City is available on the Metropolitan
Council website here.
The purpose of this study is to analyze Hopkins’ unique housing stock and
recommend the most effective way to use limited resources (including LAHA
and AHTF) to meet community priorities for housing, including the preservation
of affordable housing and the creation of new affordable housing.
II. Scope of Work and Deliverables
The City of Hopkins seeks to engage a qualified consultant to conduct a
comprehensive housing assessment and recommend priority spending areas
and strategies to remove barriers to the production and preservation of
affordable housing. This work will support the City’s efforts to equitably allocate
Page | 3
new affordable housing resources and advance inclusive community
development. Ultimately this work will also inform the 2050 Comprehensive
Plan.
The objectives of this work include:
• Assess current housing stock and identify any gaps in housing types that
could be supported in the market
• Identify affordable housing needs within the community of Hopkins
• Inventory and evaluate affordable housing funding sources
• Identify funding opportunities for addressing priority needs
• Recommend policy and program development based on funding
opportunities with a cost-benefit analysis (how can be best use our limited
resources for the most impact)
• Engage stakeholders throughout this process
The scope of the study should include, but is not limited to:
Housing Data Collection
• Conduct a housing needs assessment that includes an analysis of
housing types, housing conditions, housing demand, affordability gaps,
population growth, and demographic trends
• Identify current and projected housing needs across income levels,
household types, and demographic groups, with particular attention to
cost-burdened households, vulnerable populations, and areas facing
gentrification or housing instability
• Provide data in accessible format to staff to create a Housing Dashboard
to display the affordable housing data (example: Minnetonka Housing
ArcGIS StoryMap and Rental Inventory; St Louis Park Housing Multifamily
Housing)
Data should be sufficient to meet the minimum requirements for the housing
portion of the 2050 Comprehensive Plan.
Dow Towers Evaluation (Alternate Bid)
Dow Towers is a federally subsidized Public Housing development overseen by
the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of
Public and Indian Housing and is owned/administer locally by the HRA. The City
Page | 4
is interested in evaluating conversion options under HUD’s Rental Assistance
Demonstration (RAD) program including Section 18/RAD blend and seeks a
feasibility analysis that reflects current federal policy, funding uncertainty, and
local financing considerations.
At a minimum, the consultant shall:
• Evaluate the feasibility, benefits, risk, and prerequisites of converting
Dow Towers from Public Housing to: RAD Project Based Voucher (PBV),
Projected Based Rental Assistance (PBRA) and Section 18 Disposition
with Tenant Protection Vouchers, including a Section 18/RAD Blend
Scenario.
• Analyze resident impacts and protections, including but not limited to:
changes to the resident rent calculations, utility allowances, income
recertification requirements, Right-To-Return, relocation requirements
(temporary or permanent), resident communication obligations, impacts
to resident services, supportive housing consideration, and long-term
housing stability
• Assess financial implications including but not limited to: changes to
operating subsidy, capital funding, long term revenue stability, impacts to
rental income, program income, cash flow under RAD and/or Section 18
scenarios, ability to leverage private debt, tax-exempt bonds, or other
capital sources post-conversion
• Evaluate capital needs and funding feasibility including but not limited to:
RAD Awards and/or Section 18 approvals, implications of congressional
appropriations volatility and timing risk related to RAD and Section 18
funding. Anticipated HUD processing timelines, milestones, and approval
risk based on current federal guidance
• Analyze the interaction with the State of Minnesota resources including
but not limited to: eligibility for and impacts of the Minnesota Publicly
Owned Housing Program specifically coordination or conflicts between
POHP requirements the HRA is obligated to and HUD conversion
pathways
• Assess the impact of local financing decisions including but not limited
to: how acceptance or use of proceeds from General Obligation bonds
(POHP), Housing Improvement Area bonds, or other public financing may
effect eligibility for Section 18 disposition or RAD conversion with
Page | 5
This is the opportunity summary page. It provides an overview of this opportunity and a preview of the attached documentation.