ANTENNA

Active

Contract Opportunity

CONTACT INFORMATION|4|N731.44|N00383|215-697-5970|DANIELLE.DICIACCO.CIV@US.NAVY.MIL|
ITEM UNIQUE IDENTIFICATION AND VALUATION (JAN 2023)|19||||||||||||||||||||
HIGHER-LEVEL CONTRACT QUALITY REQUIREMENT|8|X||||||||
FMS DELIVERY AND SHIPPING INSTRUCTIONS|3|||X|
WIDE AREA WORKFLOW PAYMENT INSTRUCTIONS (JAN 2023)|16|INVOICE AND RECEIVING REPORTS (COMBO)||N/A|N00383|N/A|N/A|N/A|N/A|||||||||
NAVY USE OF ABILITYONE SUPPORT CONTRACTOR - RELEASE OF OFFEROR INFORMATION (3-18))|1||
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY (SEP 2016)|2|||
WARRANTY OF SUPPLIES OF A NONCOMPLEX NATURE (JUN 2003)|6|1 YEAR AFTER DATE OF DELIVERY|45 DAYS AFTER DISCOVERY OF DEFECT|||||
EQUAL OPPORTUITY FOR WORKERS WITH DISABILITIES (JUN 2020)|2|||
BUY AMERICAN-FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS-BALANCE OF PAYMENTS PROGRAM-BASIC (FEB 2024)|11||||||||||||
LIMITATIONS ON PASS-THROUGH CHARGES (JUN 2020)|1||
ALTERNATE A, ANNUAL REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS (NOV 2023)|13||||||||||||||
BUY AMERICAN-FREE TRADE AGREEMENTS-BALANCE OF PAYMENTS PROGRAM CERTIFICATE-BASIC (FEB 2024))|5||||||
BUY AMERICAN--BALANCE OF PAYMENTS PROGRAM (FEB 2024)|1||
ROYALTY INFORMATION (APR 1984)|1||
ANNUAL REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS (MAY 2024)|12|334220|1250|||||||||||
FACSIMILE PROPOSALS (OCT 1997)|1||
NOTICE OF PRIORITY RATING FOR NATIONAL DEFENSE, EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS, ANDENERGY PROGRAM USE (APR 2008))|2||X|
THE PURPOSE OF THIS AMENDMENT IS TO ESTABLISH THE FOLLOWING QTY:
THE QTY FOR THIS SOLICITION IS 85 UNITS.
80 UNITS WILL SHIP TO Q99722.
5 UNITS WILL SHIP TO PSP00U.
ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS REMAIN THE SAME.
THE PURPOSE OF THIS AMENDMENT IS TO INCORPORTE THE FOLLOWING CHANGES:
THE QTY IS HEREBY UPDATED BY 80 UNITS, FROM 5 UNITS TO 80 UNITS.
ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS REMAIN THE SAME.
This RFP is for a FMS spares buy and will be using competitive procedures.
This requirement will be awarded to the offeror with the lowest price technically acceptable (LPTA) quote.
The Small Business Administration representative at NAVSUP WSS has reviewed this requirement and determined that a set-aside recommendation was not applicable for this procurement.

Attachments/Links