NOI: Duke Golf Course Aerial Rehabilitation and Lick Basin Sewer Assessments

Location:	North Carolina
Posted:	Mar 27, 2026
Due:	Apr 4, 2026
Agency:	City of Durham
Type of Government:	State & Local
Category:	B - Special Studies and Analyses - Not R&D U - Education and Training Services Y - Construction of Structures and Facilities
Publication URL:	To access bid details, please log in.

Bid Title:	NOI: Duke Golf Course Aerial Rehabilitation and Lick Basin Sewer Assessments
Category:	Recommendations of Award
Status:	Open

Description:

**** INTENT TO AWARD TO: The Wooten Company *****

Publication Date/Time:

3/27/2026 8:00 AM

Closing Date/Time:

4/4/2026 8:00 AM

Contact Person:

Kasim Azhar
[emailÂ protected]

CITY OF DURHAM

Finance Department

101 CITY HALL PLAZA | DURHAM, NC 27701

919.560.4455 | F 919.560.1151

www.DurhamNC.gov

NOTICE OF INTENT TO AWARD A CONTRACT THIS IS NOT AN ORDER

DATE ISSUED:

RFQ DEADLINE:

RFQ SUBJECT:

PROJECT NAME:

PROJECT NO:

INTENT TO AWARD TO:

AMOUNT:

3/27/2026

9/18/2025

Duke Golf Course Aerial Rehabilitation and Lick Basin Sewer Assessments

Pending

The Wooten Company

$287,400.00

CONTRACTING OFFICER: Kasim Azhar, P.E.

This is a notice of the City of Durham’s intent to award a contract. The responsible and responsive offeror

whose proposal was determined in writing to be the most advantageous is indicated. The offeror identified

here as submitting the most advantageous proposal is instructed not to proceed until a contract, or other form

of notice is given by the contracting officer. A company or person who proceeds prior to receiving a contract,

Contract Award, or other form of notice of award does so without a contract and at their own risk.

An offeror who wishes to protest this Notice of Intent must file the protest within (7) business days from the

posting of this notice in accordance with City of Durham Policy FP113. A protest shall be in writing, set for the

protester’s understanding of the basis for the recommendation, and the specific facts, circumstances, and

grounds that demonstrate that the contract award by the City, as requested in the recommendation, would be

unlawful or unfair to the detriment of the protester. (Section IV(C)(2))

This is the opportunity summary page. It provides an overview of this opportunity and a preview of the attached documentation.

See also