Connecticut High Dosage Tutoring Program
Purpose: Given the extensive impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on students, states and districts
across the country are seeking to identify and implement viable methods to accelerate learning.
High-Dosage Tutoring (HDT) is a well-researched strategy to address learning loss, ensuring students
have intensive, curriculum-aligned support to close academic gaps. Public Act (PA) 26-68, Section 1 is
allocating $2 million in funding to local education agencies (LEAs) to implement the Connecticut HDT
Program in accordance with evidence-based guidelines through a competitive grant process to LEAs
meeting the criteria established in this competitive grant application. The criteria within the grant
application originate from contemporary research, paired with authentic implementation
experiences across select Connecticut LEAs.
The grant period aligns to PA 26-68, Section 1 timeline and grant revision protocols, with applications
to the High-Dosage Tutoring Program due no later than Friday September 11, 2026, at 5:00 PM EDT
and announced awards by September 25, 2026. The grant period ends June 30, 2027, the date by
which funds must be expended.
All HDT programs for successful applicants must be ready to implement no later than October 23,
2026. All interested applicants are also welcome and encouraged to register for an online Bidder’s
Conference on August 14, 2026, from 2:00-3:00 PM to learn more about the process. The Bidder’s
Conference will be recorded and posted to eGMS. Questions may be directed to Irene Parisi at
Irene.Parisi@ct.gov.
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer
The Connecticut State Department of Education is committed to a policy of equal
opportunity/affirmative action for all qualified persons. The Connecticut Department of Education
does not discriminate in any employment practice, education program, or educational activity on the
basis of: race; color; religious creed; age; sex; pregnancy; sexual orientation; workplace hazards to
reproductive systems; gender identity or expression; marital status; national origin; ancestry;
retaliation for previously opposed discrimination or coercion; intellectual disability; genetic
information; learning disability; physical disability (including, but not limited to, blindness); mental
disability (past/present history thereof); military or veteran status; status as a victim of domestic
violence; or criminal record in state employment, in accordance with applicable statutes, unless there
is a bona fide occupational qualification excluding persons in any of the aforementioned protected
classes. Inquiries regarding the Connecticut State Department of Education’s nondiscrimination
policies should be directed to: Attorney Louis Todisco, Connecticut State Department of Education,
by mail 450 Columbus Boulevard, Suite 605, Hartford, CT 06103-1841; or by telephone 860-713-6594;
or by email louis.todisco@ct.gov.
All of the information contained in any proposal submitted in response to this RFP is subject to the
provisions of the Connecticut Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), C.G.S. Sections 1-200 et seq.
2
Table of Contents
Connecticut High Dosage Tutoring Program ................................................................................ 2
I. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 5
II. Program Vision and Outcomes ........................................................................................... 6
III. Eligible Applicants and Grant Supports............................................................................ 6
IV. Eligible Activities and Spending ...................................................................................... 7
V. Program Elements ............................................................................................................ 7
VI. Priority Students........................................................................................................... 9
VII. Application Questions ..................................................................................................11
VIII. Review Process and Scoring Criteria...............................................................................16
IX. Evaluation and Reporting .............................................................................................18
X. Closing Statement ...........................................................................................................18
Appendix A: ..........................................................................................................................19
Standard Statement of Assurances for Grant Programs....................................................19
4
I. Introduction
High-Dosage Tutoring
According to contemporary research and the Connecticut High Dosage Tutoring Statewide Program
Evaluation, High-Dosage Tutoring (HDT) is an effective strategy to accelerate learning and provide
equity in accessing tutoring for all students. The intensity and frequency of HDT has been shown to
accelerate learning more than any other academic intervention. An exemplary HDT model is made
accessible intentionally, embedding small-group and/or individual instruction during the school day.
Instructed by highly-qualified tutors, every session focuses on students’ identified needs with
standards-based content aligned to the LEA’s curriculum, grade level performance goals, and high
school course requirements.
Research and Results
Research on successful HDT models reveals a significant impact on academic progress when tutoring
focuses on mathematics in grades 6 through 9. Not all tutoring is effective if certain program
elements are not in place, such as minimum dosages, tutor-student ratios, tutor-teacher
communication, high-quality tutor training, and standards-aligned curriculum. Research outcomes
indicate that intensive models of tutoring, when implemented with fidelity, can produce learning
gains for students as high as one to two years in math beyond what students typically achieve in the
classroom, with reductions in failure rates by more than 50 percent.
Need and Equity in Connecticut
Matched student data reveal that academic growth in mathematics from the prior grade consistently
lags in the middle grades 6 through 8 as compared to in the elementary grades 4 and 5. See table
below. This was true prior to the pandemic and remained true in the years after as well. The intent of
including grades 9 and 10 is to support the transition to high-level, more complex mathematics in the
higher grades.
5