UP-Boucke Building Capital Renewal

DATE: April 18, 2025
SUBJECT: Request for Proposals - Design-Build Team Selection
Boucke Building Capital Renewal - University Park Campus
University Park, PA
TO: Alexander - Quinn Evans
Barton Malow Builders - HGA
Massaro Construction Group - LGA Partners
PJ Dick - Kimmel Bogrette Architecture
Rycon Construction - AE Works
Wohlsen Construction - Gensler
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS - PART 1
PROJECT INFORMATION and OWNER REQUIREMENTS
The Pennsylvania State University (PSU) wants to thank the 9 D-B teams that submitted Letters of Interest for this
vital project. In addition, after careful review of the received Letters of Interest, PSU would like to congratulate the
above six teams who were selected to continue to the next step in the process- the invitation to respond to this
Request for Proposal (RFP).
The D-B Selection process is as follows.
* Proposals from the long-listed teams are due at Noon, Eastern Standard Time (EST), May 16, 2025.
* The Screening Committee will choose up to three firms from the RFP respondents. The short-list results
and interview notice will be posted on the OPP website by the end-of-day, June 6, 2025.
* On June 17, 2025, in-person interviews will occur at the Eric J. Barron Innovation Hub in State College, PA.
This date will not change, so please plan accordingly. Also, Non-Binding Fees for the entire D-B Team are
due just before the in-person interviews.
* The D-B Team selection process results will be posted on the OPP website in June 2025. We plan to start
immediately after contract negotiation to align with the project schedule.
Participation in this D-B Team selection process is voluntary and at no cost or obligation to PSU. PSU reserves the
right to waive any informality in any submissions and reject any submission or portion thereof. PSU reserves the
right to modify dates as it deems necessary.
CONFIDENTIALITY AND NON-DISCLOSURE
D-B Teams may not make news releases about this project without prior approval from PSU and then only in
coordination with PSU. In addition, all information, documents, and correspondence shared within the D-B
selection process are to remain confidential and, as such, are not made public in any manner. Please contact me
(information below) or the Facilities Project Manager Tyler Payne (tjp5136@psu.edu or 814-308-2783) with any
questions.
1

Request for Proposals - Design-Build Team Selection
Boucke Building Capital Renewal - University Park Campus
A. PROJECT OVERVIEW
This renovation is a building system and program renewal project intended to reduce backlog and update aging
infrastructure at Boucke Building. Boucke Building, built in 1955, was a multi-story facility containing classroom
and office space. It was named in honor of Professor of Economics Oswald F. Boucke. Located at core campus, the
facility resides along Pollock Road adjacent to the HUB-Robeson Center, on one of the most traveled pedestrian
corridors on the University Park Campus. The 95,000 square foot facility (56,000 square feet assignable) contains
office space for multiple departments/campus groups along with general purpose classrooms. The facility
occupants include Student Affairs, Undergraduate Education, Global Programs, Educational Equity, Disability
Services, General Purpose Classrooms.
The project will address deferred maintenance issues that have accumulated over time, ensuring the Boucke
Building is in good repair and reducing future maintenance costs. The project will also address critical
infrastructure needs, improving the building's functionality. The renovation involves a complex sequence of work
on a core campus building, including mechanical and plumbing upgrades, window replacement, life safety system
upgrades, and accessibility improvements, all while maintaining operations.
B. PROJECT OBJECTIVES
The total scope of work depends on the economic climate at bidding and construction commensurate with the
design that optimizes the established budget and PSU/facility needs. While the project primary objectives are
updating building systems and windows, the University is also looking to enhance facility accessibility and provide
an architectural refresh of the facility corridors.
The D-B Team will bridge the proposed project scope with the realities of the current budget, existing building
uses, and project requirements. The project aims to reduce the Boucke Building backlog by:
Updating existing facility mechanical systems
Window replacement
Updating existing facility life safety systems
An independent accessibility study, separate from the Boucke Building Capital Renewal project, is currently
assessing existing conditions and developing recommendations to address facility deficiencies. The study
deliverable will be provided to the awarded D-B Team at the onset of the renewal project design phase.
The facility does contain asbestos containing materials (ACM). Abatement of these materials will be addressed
where necessary to accomplish the project scope outlined herein.
C. PROJECT SCOPE OF WORK:
The preliminary project scope is pulled from the current facility maintenance backlog. A summary of the existing
facility assets associated with the current maintenance backlog is included in the following attachment:
ISES Corporation Facility Condition Assessment - Boucke Building Asset 0013-000, dated January 30, 2025
The information included in the provided facility condition assessment document are provided as a reference only.
The selected D-B Team is responsible for on-site verification and confirmation of projects costs following notice of
award.
The anticipated project mechanical scope includes, but is not limited to, replacement and updating of both main
and terminal equipment as necessary to address facility comfort cooling needs that are in compliance with the
University's design and construction standards. Updates to existing infrastructure to support this systems upgrade
(new plumbing connections, electrical connections/upgrades, etc.) to be included with this scope as well. New
2

Request for Proposals - Design-Build Team Selection
Boucke Building Capital Renewal - University Park Campus
building mechanical systems to be outfitted with Automated Logic Corporation controls. The building automation
systems design and sequencing to comply with Office of Physical Plant (OPP) Design Standards and be coordinated
with OPP's Facilities Automation Services group.
The intent of the window replacement is to provide more modern systems that will enhance facility energy
efficiency and occupant comfort, in conjunction with the mechanical systems scope. New window replacement to
comply with current energy and building codes. The exterior aesthetic component of this scope will be
coordinated with the University Architect(s) and other personnel within OPP's Planning Design and Properties
group.
Additional desired scope the University is looking to incorporate as part of the project, should the project budget
permit:
Fire Alarm and Fire Suppression System upgrades and install
o Current fire alarm panel and devices have exceeded anticipated life expectancy
o No automated fire suppression system present
Accessibility improvements throughout facility
o Door hardware, restrooms, and other input from the independent accessibility study
o Facility main entrance along Pollock Road
Aesthetic Improvements
o Refresh of existing building corridors
Associated project abatement efforts to be coordinated with the University's Environmental Health and Safety
department.
Incidental finish restoration related to the project scope above is intended to match existing conditions, with some
exceptions. This will be coordinated between the D-B Team and PSU during the project design phase.
The selected DB Team will be responsible for quantifying project energy savings during the design phase to
validate potential funding contributions from OPP's Energy Savings Program.
Proposed scope of work to be finalized during the design phase once there is sufficient information to validate the
project budget and schedule.
D. PROJECT BUDGET
The preliminary Total Project Budget for the project is as follows:
Construction* $ 14.1M
Indirect / Soft Costs / Contingency $ 4.3M
TOTAL $ 18.4M
* Includes cost of any required abatement, demolition, temporary occupant relocation, D-B team
management fees, insurance, general requirements, general conditions and construction contingency.
A firm grasp on the cost from the outset of design and forward will be a crucial skill of the D-B Team.
E. PROJECT SCHEDULE
PSU will execute the Design-Build contract shortly after the D-B Team selection. The project scope validation and
design will begin immediately following. Project target dates include:
3

Request for Proposals - Design-Build Team Selection
Boucke Building Capital Renewal - University Park Campus
Design Kick-Off / Scope Validation ....................................................................................... July 2025
Pre-Construction / Design ................................................................................ July 2025 - April 2026
Establish GMP ..................................................................................................................... May 2026
Construction Start ........................................................................................................... August 2026
Substantial Completion ................................................................................................ February 2028
The successful D-B Team will work in conjunction with the University project team and stakeholders to confirm and
maintain the project schedule throughout the design and construction phases.
F. SPECIFIC BUILDING AND SITE INFORMATION
Boucke Building is situated along Pollock Road between Osmond Laboratory and Ritenour Building. High
pedestrian and vehicle traffic are experienced at the building perimeter due to its proximity to the HUB-Robeson
Center, Pollock Road, and other significant facilities at core campus. Below grade utilities are present throughout
the building perimeter, with the highest concentration being along the south elevation, adjacent to Pollock Road.
The utilities at this location include a steam tunnel parallel to Pollock Road. The campus steam connection has
been in place since original facility construction while the campus chilled water system was connected in 2011.
The building interior spaces are conditioned by a combination of mechanical units within the existing mechanical
tower, rooftop systems, and the building hot water loop. Terminal equipment includes a combination of fin tub
radiators, fan coil units, and VAVs. Existing terminal equipment throughout the building varies due to isolated
renovations completed since original facility construction. Multiple exhaust fans are present at the facility roof,
including one at the basement mechanical room.
The mechanical tower was added to the facility during a 2011 mechanical upgrade project.
The single pane windows are original to the facility and are operable. Ribbon windows are present at the existing
east, north, and west building elevations where brick facade is present. The south building elevation includes
window units adjacent to limestone and alberene finishes.
The steel building structure is supported by a combination of concrete caissons and shallow foundations. Concrete
slabs support the floors above grade.
The adjacent Physics Building project is currently scheduled for substantial completion during summer 2026.
G. PROJECT ATTRIBUTES
The PSU project team and stakeholders will work with the selected to refine the scope of work and construction
phasing. PSU has identified the following attributes that are vital to the success of this project:
* Existing Infrastructure Age, System Deficiencies, and Regulatory Compliance.
* Precise Budget Allocation and Funding Assessment Between Systems and Program.
* Implementation of Best Practices to Achieve Efficiency/Energy Goals
* Achieving Design Consensus and Managing Scope Creep.
* Academic Calendar, Occupant Needs during Construction, and Construction Phasing Alignment.
* Minimizing Disruptions to Normal Operations During Construction.
4

Request for Proposals - Design-Build Team Selection
Boucke Building Capital Renewal - University Park Campus
Attributes common to most building projects on campus that deserve mention here are as follows:
* Create a great place for Penn State students and faculty that helps to expand their skills and enhances
their experience at the University. Centralize and inspire closer connections between and within the
subject building and the larger University. We seek an D-B team who can maximize the scope and intent
to ensure the project captures the spirit and supports this aim.
* Provide flexible, state-of-the-art instructional space that supports emerging pedagogies. Develop shared
collaboration and instructional spaces to inspire desired connections.
* The building will be a welcoming place accessible to all and a place where all people are comfortable and
not intimidated. In the design, consider strategic use of exterior/interior transparency to showcase unique
aspects of the building and/or to entice people into the facility.
* Provide a facility to strengthen the University's educational programs and efficiently address spatial
deficiencies, both in quality and quantity of space. PSU is seeking a D-B Team that can drive our formation
of optimal grossing factors and teams that innovate efficiencies.
* Given the prominent core campus and campus edge site location, the building should positively
contribute to the campus and broader master plan, both short-term and long-term - especially in light of
the future master planning objectives for the Hammond Building replacement.
* In keeping with PSU's commitment to environmental sustainability, this facility will be a high-performance
building in accordance with OPP Design and Construction Standards 018000 Performance Requirements.
The project shall include a building energy simulation model. The project will follow the PSU LEED Policy
Document as a guide and may consider additional sustainability or high-performance innovations.
H. PROJECT DELIVERY
This project is funded by PSU and will be delivered under a Design-Build Guaranteed Maximum Price Contract (DB-
GMP). The D-B Team will responsible for developing project cost estimates which, which will be reconciled
following each deliverable milestone. Project budget confirmation is required before PSU will allow the D-B Team
to proceed with each subsequent design phase.
The Owner's "DB-GMP Contract" will be used for this project. The prime firm (contract holder) of the awarded D-B
Team will sign the DB-GMP Contract. By submitting a proposal, firms pledge to agree to the Contract's terms and
conditions without exception or modification. A sample DB-GMP contract will be provided to long-listed Teams by
the end of Friday, April 25, 2025.
Penn State University and the OPP require a high level of collaboration and LEAN principles to ensure project
success. The final selected D-B Team must establish a process for the project's design, documentation, and
execution.
The selected D-B Team will begin this project by validating the project scope indicated herein to address the
facility backlog indicated in the ISES Facility Condition Assessment report, dated January 30, 2025. PSU will work
with the selected D-B Team to confirm the project scope and budget throughout the project design and
construction phases.
During the project design phase, PSU typically follows industry-standard design phases (Schematic Design, Design
Development, and Construction Documents. As mentioned, the project budget and cost estimate(s) must align
before advancing to each subsequent phase of the project. PSU will work with the selected D-B Team to confirm a
design phase deliverable schedule for this project.
5

Request for Proposals - Design-Build Team Selection
Boucke Building Capital Renewal - University Park Campus
Please describe the D-B Team's approach to developing design options in Proposal Section 3. PSU will require
multiple explorations to "get it right" and will want the ability to compare various ideas. Each option should be
within the budget.
I. RFP SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND LINKS
* ISES Corporation Facility Condition Assessment - Boucke Building Asset 0013-000, dated January 30,
2025 (Attached)
* Boucke Building Block Plans (Attached)
* DB-GMP Contract. Sample DB-GMP Contract to be provided to long listed Teams by end of Friday, April 25,
2025
Please review this sample contract to ensure that your firm accepts all terms and conditions as written.
In submitting a proposal for this project, you acknowledge that you concur, without exception, with all
terms, conditions, and provisions of the DB-GMP Contract.
* Design Phase Deliverables. Reference this document under the heading 00 51 00 MISCELLANEOUS
FORMS at the following link: Attachments - 01 01 00 PROJECT DOCUMENT FORMAT - OPP Design and
Construction Standards - Confluence
* Office of the Physical Plan (OPP) Standards. This website provide information regarding specific design
submission requirements and standards of the University. Please review to ensure that your team is
able to deliver a compliant building. https://oppwiki.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/OPPDCS/overview
* OPP High Performance Standards. The University has a commitment to environmental stewardship
with a focus on university and campuswide carbon reduction and totalcostof ownership. Our
projects require maximum consideration of potential sustainable and energy efficient designs and
specifications for architectural, site, utility, structural, mechanical, electrical, and plumbing disciplines.
Refer to the following link for the University's high-performance standards that exceed building code
minimum requirements:
https://oppwiki.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/OPPDCS/pages/5409436/01+80+00+PERFORMANCE+REQUIR
EMENTS
A part of this is PSU's High-Performance Building Design Standards: Building projects shall comply with
ASHRAE Standard 90.1 Energy Standard for Buildings 2010 version AND as superseded by more
stringent requirements of ASHRAE Standard 189.1 Standard for the Design of High-Performance Green
Buildings, 2011 version. The project will consider additional sustainability or high-performance
measures and innovations.
* Building Information Modeling. The University is committed to utilizing BIM technologies and
processes to execute the design, construction, and operations of its new High Performances buildings
and the updating of all existing structures and infrastructure. Refer to the following link for the
University's BIM Execution Planning:
https://oppwiki.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/OPPDCS/pages/5409490/00+50+00+CONTRACTING+FORMS
+ AND+SUPPLEMENTS .
6

Request for Proposals - Design-Build Team Selection
Boucke Building Capital Renewal - University Park Campus
SITE TOURS AND PRE-PROPOSAL SUBMISSION CONTACT
PSU encourages the teams to visit the site during this selection process. However, guided site and
building tours will not be given at this time but may be scheduled later with the short-listed teams. All
firms are welcome on their own to spend as much time as needed on campus. Contact Julie Hedgeland,
Senior Architect, for any questions related to this request for proposal or general questions on the D-B
Team selection process. The deadline for questions is noon, May 2, 2025.
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS - PART 2
PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS
Deliver (e-mail) electronic copies (PDFs) of the Proposal to:
Shipping Address (Note PDFs only - no hardcopies):
Julie Hedgeland, RA - jvh6712@psu.edu
and
Tyler Payne, PE - tjp5136@psu.edu
Electronic submissions of the D-B Team's Proposals are due by Noon Eastern Standard Time on May 16, 2025.
Proposals received after this date and time may be automatically rejected. Proposals shall be provided in an
8.5"x 11" format. Limit submission to fifty (50) single-sided pages maximum (25 double-sided), plus a two-page
maximum cover letter. Double-sided printing is encouraged-10-point font type minimum.
A cover letter shall be provided from the proposed leader of the Prime (contract holding) D-B Team. The cover
letter should be two-page maximum. The cover letter should include at least the following:
A. Legal name of the Prime D-B Team. If separate, legal name of the Architect and/or Engineer of Record
(stamping)
B. Primary office location(s) of Prime D-B Team, Architect of Record, and Engineer of Record
C. Contact information for the D-B team's primary point of contact (name, address, phone, and email)
D. A concise summary as to why the Team is best suited for this project
E. Statement of certification that all information provided in the submittal is accurate
Collate and bind proposals according to the following Proposal Sections:
Proposals shall follow the below format, in the order stated to ensure that all pertinent information necessary for
evaluation is included and easily comparable by the Selection Committee. The cover letter, table of contents, and
divider pages will not count towards the RFP page limitation. We encourage teams to be as brief as possible without
sacrificing accuracy and completeness.
* Note 1:
As applicable throughout the Proposal, provide professional credit to project partners (including contractor, sub-
contractors, design architect, architect of record, engineer of record, other team partners) for all projects
discussed within the Proposal and for all project images shown.
7

Request for Proposals - Design-Build Team Selection
Boucke Building Capital Renewal - University Park Campus
PROPOSAL SECTION 1 - TEAM STRUCTURE
A. Identify the entire proposed D-B design team, including Prime (Contract Holding) firm, Lead Design
firm (if different), architectural partners (as applicable), building system engineering firms, and
proposed specialty consultant firms. Identify the roles and split/sharing of project responsibilities
for all firms involved, where applicable. A Pennsylvania registered architect and engineer must
stamp the final construction and bidding documents.
Provide insights into the firm's unique qualifications/ characteristics, firm personality, design
ethos/ philosophy, client notations of previous project success, etc.
For each firm, identify the firm differentiators, size, qualifications, and experience on similar
projects, and identify each firm's role in this project. Identify past collaboration between prime
firm/contract holder and key design partners (architects/engineers/consultants), including the
number/ value of projects and the key partners' added benefit to the Team. It is encouraged to create
D-B Teams that demonstrate previous successful collaboration and execution of projects like this one.
While we appreciate teams with experience at PSU we do not have a preferred vendor list and
encourage the selection of high-quality design partners and specialty consultants. If proposed project
teams do not have PSU experience, convey how the Team has previously incorporated the Owner's
design standards similar to the Penn State Design and Construction Standards.
B. Provide team organizational chart. Include all firms and consultants and provide the name and role of
key team members. Clearly identify which team members are designated for leadership positions on
the Team. Please highlight Diverse Business Enterprise Program (DBE) representation on the Team.
Refer to RFP Section 2.F., below.
C. Provide role descriptions and resumes of key team members identified in the Organizational Chart.
Include registrations/ certifications, educational background, years of experience, and relevant project
experience. Relevant project experience should include project size/cost, program type, project
overview, year completed or scheduled completion date, and define each team member's role on each
project listed on their resume. Emphasize each team member's most relevant experience and ideally
highlight that the team member has had comparable roles on similar projects. Include at least two
client references for each key team member. If possible, please avoid using Penn State employees as
references. Include resumes for at least the following key team members. If individuals serve
multiple roles, identify multiple roles on Organization Chart and resumes.
1. Principal in Charge (Project Team Lead)
2. Lead Design Architect/Engineer (Lead Designer).
3. Project Manager (PSU's day-to-day point of contact)
4. Project Architect (Architectural Technical Lead)
5. Project Engineer (Engineer Design Lead)
6. Construction Administration Leader (Construction oversight leader)
7. Sustainability Leader and/or energy modeler
8. Lead Mechanical, Electrical, Plumbing/FP, Structural, Civil, design engineers
9. Cost Estimator
PROPOSAL SECTION 2 - TEAM QUALIFICATIONS
A. Provide a summary of qualifications and expertise of the D-B Team with specific emphasis on:
1. Design Excellence, including national recognition.
2. Distinguishing factors of team differentiation.
8

Request for Proposals - Design-Build Team Selection
Boucke Building Capital Renewal - University Park Campus
3. Experience delivering projects of similar scope, scale, and complexity. (See Note 1 above)
4. Expertise in planning, designing, and delivering state-of-the-art academic, research, and
workplace facilities. Highlight team experience and/or insights for projects with similar scope.
(See Note 1 above)
B. Identify a maximum of five (5) example projects within approximately the last ten (10) years, that
BEST exemplify the qualifications and expertise listed above for the proposed Team. Include a brief
description of each project, project gross square feet, project budget, final project cost, project
completion date, and client reference(s). Indicate year of completion and project cost for the example
projects. Highlight key strategies and approaches from these projects. Show illustrative
representation of the example projects, particularly those highlighting the work of the Team's
proposed Lead Design Architect and Design Engineer. Highlight projects that incorporated building
system renewals and/or projects that similarly explored multiple design directions. Captions of
photos encouraged. (See Note 1 above)
(Optional) If necessary, discuss any of the example project(s) that are highly relevant to our project in
more detail. Include insights into what made these project(s) successful, including how those design
intentions were translated into a meaningful and synthesized/successful solution.
C. Project Relevancy Matrix. Develop a matrix that illustrates the similarities between the example
projects and this project. Please be as specific to our project as possible.
D. People-Projects Matrix. Develop a matrix to show the participation of key individuals on the
proposed Team from the example projects. List individual's role on example projects.
E. Diverse Business Enterprise. The Pennsylvania State University is committed to and accountable for
advancing diversity, equity, and inclusion in all its forms. Therefore, we encourage the participation of
Minority Business Enterprises, Women Business Enterprises, Veteran Business Enterprises, Service-
Disabled Veteran Business Enterprises, and LGBT Business Enterprises (collectively referred to as
Diverse Business Enterprise (DBE) for Design Professionals.
D-B Teams are encouraged to include at least one (1) certified DBE design professional firm as part of
their Team. In addition, if the proposing firm itself is a current Diverse Business Enterprise, the firm
should state that fact in its Proposal. Below is a partial list of acceptable certifying agencies:
1. * Department of General Services Bureau of Small Business Opportunities (DGS BSBO)
2. Federal Department of Transportation
3. National Minority Development Council (NMSDC) or its affiliates
4. Southern PA Transportation Authority (SEPTA)
5. Women Business Enterprise National Council (WBENC)
6. Pennsylvania Unified Certification Program (PA UCP)
7. National Women Business Owners Corporation (NWBOC)
8. Minority Business Enterprise Council (MBEC)
9. National Gay and Lesbian Chamber of Commerce (NGLLC)
10. U. S. Department of Veteran Affairs (VOB/SDVOB)
* Or comparable state agencies or regulating bodies in other states or local jurisdictions.
F. List the Errors & Omissions insurance coverage limits of the lead/ prime entity of the D-B team. In
addition, provide information on errors and omissions claims in the last (7) seven years.
G. Provide a historical breakdown of project performance for Prime Firm and Architect/Engineer of
Record (as applicable). Include a list of projects, delivery method, history of project budgets compared
9

Request for Proposals - Design-Build Team Selection
Boucke Building Capital Renewal - University Park Campus
to completed construction cost, history of change orders, average response time to RFIs, and any other
key metrics the Team deems most relevant to this project.
H. Acknowledge the review and acceptance of the sample DB-GMP contract, ensuring that the D-B Team
accepts all terms and conditions as written. In submitting a proposal for this project, the D-B Team
concurs, without exception, with all terms, conditions, and provisions of this Contract.
PROPOSAL SECTION 3 - PROJECT APPROACH AND SCHEDULE
A. Describe the D-B Team's proposed approach for this project. Be as specific to our project as possible.
Discuss, at the least, the D-B Team's approach to the following:
1. Project visioning and project mission/goal setting. And the Team's approach to establishing a
design process that works to achieve the project objectives and proposed scope
2. Scope validation and knowledge of the project brief. Additionally, describe any planning
tools, benchmarking tools, and/or other team-specific methodologies to assist in the
execution of our project.
3. How the initial project phase leads into the Concept Design and/or Schematic Design Phase
of the project.
4. Developing building planning options and/or overall building design schemes.
5. Working with PSU to analyze, compare/contrast different design options.
6. Accommodating facility occupants during the project construction phase.
7. Integration of BIM, "predictive modeling," analytical/ digital tools, and the utilization of
PSU' immersive construction lab, the ICon Lab.
B. Approach to project delivery. At least, describe the D-B Team's overall approach to:
1. Achieving the project schedule.
2. Identifying key risks to the project schedule and strategy for mitigating such risks.
3. Planning, managing, and executing the project.
4. Building consensus and guiding stakeholders through decision-making processes.
5. Creating a collaborative environment between the D-B team and PSU/OPP stakeholders.
6. Working as a D-B Team throughout the design and construction phases. Describe previous
success delivering design-build projects. Identify potential innovative strategies to
implement during the design, procurement, and construction of the project, while
maintaining quality and uncompromised project goals.
C. Approach to Cost Control. Delivering our project on budget is critical. So, provide the D-B Team's
approach to managing costs through all design and construction phases, especially considering
escalating construction costs. Additionally, provide the following:
1. Highlight the Team's cost estimating process, scope/budget alignment, and cost/quality
control through the design and construction phases.
2. Define critical factors concerning the project budget.
3. Provide the Team's impression of the project budget.
4. Identify key risks to the project budget and strategy for mitigating such risks.
D. Approach to MEP and building system design. A narrative approach to MEP planning/ design/
delivery of facility that contains space types as noted herein. Be specific with the Team's experience
and highlight its project type expertise. Identify approach(es) to phasing facility wide MEP system
upgrades that will minimize occupant impact through the project construction phase.
10