J053--Repair Loading Dock Security Gate

Active

Contract Opportunity

Evaluation Criteria
Factor #1 Technical Approach
Each offeror shall submit a technical approach narrative which demonstrates how the offeror intends to accomplish the requirements as stated in the Statement of Work.
Understanding Interpretation of scope
Feasibility - Access to material and industry standards, teaming partners/subcontractors.

Completeness Contractor will provide all a narrative of their approach to repairing the loading dock door.
Rating Scheme - The technical approach standard will receive one of the ratings defined below. These ratings will be used to determine an overall rating for the project approach factor. A rating of unacceptable for either standard will equate to an unacceptable rating for the project approach factor and the proposal will not be further evaluated.
Adjectival Rating Standards
Rating
Description
Acceptable
Proposal clearly meets the requirements of the solicitation.
Unacceptable
Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Evaluation Factor #2 - Past Performance
Evaluation of past performance-

(A) The contracting officer s knowledge of and previous experience with the supply or service being acquired;
(B) Customer surveys, and past performance questionnaire replies;
(C) The Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) at https://www.cpars.gov; or
(D)Â Any other reasonable basis.

Offerors without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance. Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, unknown shall be considered neutral. If a rating of unacceptable for the past performance factor is assessed, the entire proposal will be determined unacceptable, and will not be further evaluated.

Past Performance Ratings
Rating
Description
Acceptable
The Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror s performance record is unknown.
Unacceptable
Based on the offeror s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort
Neutral
Offerors without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance.

Award will be made on the basis of the lowest evaluated price of proposals meeting or exceeding the acceptability standards for non-cost factors. The evaluation will be conducted by receiving all proposals submitted and reviewing the lowest price proposal to verify that that proposal meets all solicitation requirements to include the evaluation criteria. If that proposal does not meet the solicitation requirements, then the evaluation team will move on to reviewing the next lowest proposal and proceed in the same manner until a proposal meets all requirements.

Attachments/Links