REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
City of San Mateo
Cost Allocation Plan
CITY OF SAN MATEO, CALIFORNIA
02/02/2026
CITY OF SAN MATEO
330 W. 20th Avenue
San Mateo, CA 94403
I. INTRODUCTION
The City of San Mateo (the City) is requesting proposals from qualified consultants (firms) to
provide cost allocation services. The selected Consultant will be responsible for developing a
comprehensive Cost Allocation Plan. The primary goal of this study is to incorporate the plan
into internal service funds, establish appropriate funding levels, and create a cost allocation
methodology for charging General Fund departments the appropriate amounts to keep them
funded.
All responses to this opportunity must conform to the requirements of the Request for
Proposal (RFP). Failure to do so may result in the response being considered non-responsive.
All proposals submitted to the City shall become the exclusive property of the City. All
submissions shall become a matter of public record subject to disclosure.
II. BACKGROUND
The City of San Mateo, incorporated in 1894, is the largest municipality in San Mateo County,
California. The City is centrally located on “The Peninsula,” between San Francisco to the north
and San Jose to the south. The City borders the communities of Belmont, Burlingame, Foster
City, and Hillsborough, as well as the unincorporated Highlands-Baywood Park area of San
Mateo County.
The City of San Mateo is a charter city and has a Council-Manager form of government. Five
council members, elected by district, serve for four-year terms. The City Council selects a
mayor from among its members each December for a one-year term. The City Manager is
appointed by the Council and serves as the chief executive officer responsible for the day-to-
day administration of City affairs. The Council also appoints a city attorney. There are seven
advisory boards and commissions appointed by the Council.
The City provides a wide range of municipal services including police, public works, parks and
recreation, library, planning and zoning, building inspection, code enforcement, affordable housing,
sewer system, street maintenance, economic development, and general administrative services.
The City shares a consolidated Fire Department with the cities of Foster City and Belmont.
III. PROJECT OBJECTIVES
The objective of the RFP is to receive proposals for reviewing and updating the City of San
Mateo’s cost allocation plan for every City department with overhead calculations for cost
recovery.
Full Cost Allocation Plan
The purpose of the Cost Allocation Plan is to ensure that the City of San Mateo has a basis for
applying comprehensive overhead rates and is accurately accounting for the true cost of
services by each department. A full Cost Allocation Plan can allocate all indirect costs. Best
2
practices, accounting standards and Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and
Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (OMB Uniform Guidance) deem it necessary for the
City to maintain a well-documented cost allocation plan that will help it to appropriately
allocate general and administrative costs in the budget. The Plan shall also properly identify
overhead rates that can be used in the calculation of billable hourly rates for user fees, and
reimbursements from other governmental agencies. The City’s last Cost Allocation Plan was
completed in 2020 as part of a larger fee study.
IV. SCOPE OF SERVICES
Consultants may submit proposals for scope of services listed below. Consultants may also
propose using sub-consultants for part of the work. Subject to further discussion with the
selected firm(s), the City anticipates that the scope of work on this assignment may include
some or all of the following services:
Cost Allocation Plan
1. Work and meet with selected City staff to refine the project scope, purpose, uses, and
goals to ensure that the study will be both accurate and appropriate to San Mateo’s
needs.
2. Meet with staff and conduct interviews across all relevant departments as needed to
gain an understanding of the City’s processes and operations. Identify costs so they
can be allocated to and tracked by the appropriate department
3. Identify the total cost of providing each City service at the appropriate activity level
and in a manner consistent with all applicable laws, statutes, rules and regulations
governing the collection of fees, rates, and charges by public entities including, but
not limited to, the State Controller’s Office Guidelines for Cost Claiming and OMB 2
CFR Part 225 standards.
4. Develop a Cost Allocation Model using FY25/26 budget and/or actual data for
calculation of the total costs of providing each City service. The requirements of the
model should allow for:
a. Additions, revisions, or removal of direct and overhead costs so the cost
allocation plan can be easily adapted to a range of activities, both simple and
complex
b. The ability of the City to continuously update the model and full cost allocation
plan from year to year as an organization and/or service model changes occur
over time.
5. Report on other matters that surface during the evaluation that the City should
consider.
6. Present the plan to the City’s steering committee and make necessary adjustments as
requested.
7. Provide the City with an electronic copy of the final comprehensive review, including
related schedules and cost documentation in a format such as Microsoft Word and
Excel that can be edited and updated by City staff to accommodate changes in the
organization or changes in costs.
8. Provide a computer-based model in Excel for adjusting these fees and charges for the
3
City’s current and future needs and provide the City with an electronic copy of the
final cost documentation in a format that can be edited and updated by City staff to
accommodate changes in the organization or changes in costs.
9. Consult with City staff, should the need arise, to defend the cost allocation plan as a
result of audits or other challenges.
V. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
Proposers who wish to be considered for this project must submit an electronic copy of their
proposal to the City for review. Electronic documents should be submitted in PDF form.
Proposals should be clear and concise. At a minimum, each proposal must include the following
information in sections as outlined below.
a. Submittal Cover Form and Cover Letter
The proposal shall be submitted with a cover letter. The letter accompanying the proposal
must provide the name, title, address, telephone number, and signature of the individual(s)
authorized to negotiate and bind the firm contractually. An unsigned proposal or one signed
by an individual unauthorized to bind the firm may be rejected. The cover letter shall
provide a summary of the firm’s capabilities and availability of staff, information and
qualifications of the proposed lead who will be representing the firm.
b. Project Approach and Proposed Scope of Work
Provide a detailed description of the firm’s proposed approach to implementing the Scope
of Services described in Section III. At a minimum, the approach shall include an
implementation plan for the tasks described in the scope of services and any recommended
revisions or additions to the list of tasks. Tasks should be organized into phases constituting
measurable deliverables.
c. Project Schedule and Timeline
Outline a proposed project schedule and timeline starting from a kickoff meeting to
development of draft documents and final reports. This schedule can be phased or
organized in a manner the proposed deems most effective as long as there is a clearly
defined plan articulated in the proposal.
d. Experience and Qualifications
Provide a brief history of the firm, including the name of the firm, general services,
experience, the year the firm was established under the current name, the principal place of
business, and the location of local office(s). Indicate any other previous names for the firm
during the last five years and the year any name change was effective.
e. Completed Reports
Proposals should provide (2) completed reports that the firm has previously developed
4
for cities, counties or local government agencies that are comparable to the project
outlined in this RFP.
f. References
Provide a list of at least three client references for whom the firm has performed similar
work to that requested in this RFP during the past five years. For each client, please provide
the name of the client, location, proposed staff who worked on the project, description of
services, telephone number and email address.
g. Resumes and Qualifications of Proposed Personnel
This section should list key team members who will be assigned to the project, their role on
the project, primary office location, relevant experience, and applicable licenses and
certifications. This section should also include brief resumes for all key personnel proposed
for the Project.
h. Fee Schedule
Indicate the costs and hours for the total project, on a task-by-task basis and on a sub
consultant basis, inclusive of reimbursables. Provide a table with the estimated labor hours
by personnel proposed for the project for each task identified in the Scope of Services. The
table shall include subtotals by both column and row along with a total estimated hours to
perform the Scope of Services. All pertinent and relevant assumptions that may affect the
proposed hours shall be clearly listed in this section of the proposal, and prices quoted must
be binding for a minimum of the life of the project. Proposers should also include standard
hourly rates for proposed personnel.
The method of payment to the successful proposer(s) shall be on a time and expense
reimbursement basis for actual work performed. The fee schedule shall include direct costs
and overhead such as, but not limited to, transportation (within the greater Bay Area unless
approved prior), communications, subsistence, and materials. Progress payments will be
based on actual hours, hourly costs and support service costs charged to the project,
typically on a monthly basis.
i. Conflict of Interest
Provide names of individuals associated with the firm that have a potential conflict of
interest. The City may not contract with a proposer if the proposer is an employee, officer,
or director of the proposer’s firm, or any immediate family member of the preceding, has
served as an elected official, employee, board, or commission member of the City who
influences the making of the contract. Furthermore, the City may not contract with any
proposer whose income, investment, or real property interest may be affected by the
contract. Proposals are subject to disqualifications based on such a conflict of interest as
determined by the City.
j. Terms and Conditions
5
This is the opportunity summary page. It provides an overview of this opportunity and a preview of the attached documentation.