REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
RFP # 26-39
Zoning Code Rewrite and Development Review Process
Improvements
City of Ann Arbor
Planning Unit
Due Date: August 11, 2026 by 2:00 p.m. (local time)
Issued By:
City of Ann Arbor
Procurement Unit
301 E. Huron Street
Ann Arbor, MI 48104
1
Table of Contents
SECTION I – GENERAL INFORMATION ....................................................................... 3
SECTION II – SCOPE OF SERVICES.......................................................................... 10
SECTION III - MINIMUM INFORMATION REQUIRED ................................................. 21
SECTION IV – ATTACHMENTS ................................................................................... 25
2
SECTION I – GENERAL INFORMATION
A. OBJECTIVE
The City of Ann Arbor is seeking the services of a consultant (firm, nonprofit organization,
private agency) to rewrite Chapter 55 of the City Code, known as the Unified Development
Code (UDC), which contains the City’s zoning code / land use regulations, and complete
a Development Review Process Improvement Report. On March 16, 2026, the City of
Ann Arbor adopted a new Comprehensive Plan that establishes a long-term vision for
growth that is affordable, sustainable, equitable, and dynamic. Implementing that vision
will require both modernizing the City's land use regulations and improving the processes
through which development is reviewed and approved.
To advance these objectives, the City seeks consultant services for two closely related
initiatives. The first is a comprehensive rewrite of the UDC, including the adoption of a
new Zoning Map, to implement the Comprehensive Plan's future land use framework,
which will be led by City of Ann Arbor Planning Unit. The second is an evaluation of the
City's development review process to identify opportunities to improve efficiency,
transparency, predictability, and customer service for applicants, residents, and other
stakeholders, which will be led by the City of Ann Arbor Office of Economic Development.
Because these initiatives are closely connected but have distinct goals, deliverables, and
funding sources, the City intends to undertake them as separate but coordinated work
programs under a single consultant team.
For the UDC Rewrite, the City is seeking completion within a period of 24-36 months,
based on an anticipated start in November 2026. For the Development Review Process
Improvement Report, recommendations should be provided within 4-6 months from the
same initial starting date.
The consultant will coordinate work with teams from the Planning Unit, the Office of
Economic Development, the Planning Commission, City Council and any established
support committees for this project. The Planning Manager and the Economic
Development Director will oversee the direction and quality of work of this consultant.
B. QUESTIONS AND CLARIFICATIONS / DESIGNATED CITY CONTACTS
All questions regarding this Request for Proposal (RFP) shall be submitted via e-mail.
Questions will be accepted and answered in accordance with the terms and conditions of
this RFP.
All questions shall be submitted on or before July 20, 2026, at 10:00 a.m. (local
time), and should be addressed as follows:
• Scope of Work/Proposal Content questions shall be e-mailed to Michelle
Bennett, Principal Planner - mbennett@a2gov.org
• RFP Process and Compliance questions shall be e-mailed to Colin Spencer,
Buyer - CSpencer@a2gov.org
3
Should any prospective offeror be in doubt as to the true meaning of any portion of this
RFP, or should the prospective offeror find any ambiguity, inconsistency, or omission
therein, the prospective offeror shall make a written request for an official interpretation
or correction by the due date for questions above.
All interpretations, corrections, or additions to this RFP will be made only as an official
addendum that will be posted to a2gov.org and MITN.info and it shall be the prospective
offeror’s responsibility to ensure they have received all addenda before submitting a
proposal. Any addendum issued by the City shall become part of the RFP and must be
incorporated in the proposal where applicable.
C. PRE-PROPOSAL MEETING
No pre-proposal meeting will be held for this RFP. Please contact staff indicated above
with general questions regarding the RFP.
D. PROPOSAL FORMAT
To be considered, each offeror must submit a response to this RFP using the format
provided in Section III. No other distribution of proposals is to be made by the prospective
offeror. An official authorized to bind the offeror to its provisions must sign the proposal.
Each proposal must remain valid for at least ninety days from the due date of this RFP.
Proposals should be prepared simply and economically providing a straightforward,
concise description of the offeror’s ability to meet the requirements of the RFP. No
erasures are permitted. Mistakes may be crossed out and corrected and must be initialed
in ink by the person signing the proposal.
E. SELECTION CRITERIA
Responses to this RFP will be evaluated using a point system as shown in Section III. A
selection committee comprised of staff from the City will complete the evaluation.
The fee proposals will not be reviewed at the initial evaluation. After initial evaluation, the
City will determine top proposals, and open only those fee proposals. The City will then
determine which, if any, consultants will be interviewed. During the interviews, the
selected consultants will be given the opportunity to discuss their proposal, qualifications,
past experience, and their fee proposal in more detail. The City further reserves the right
to interview the key personnel assigned by the selected offeror to this project. If the City
chooses to interview any offerors, the in-person interviews will be tentatively held the
week of September 14, 2026. Offeror must be available on these dates.
All proposals submitted may be subject to clarifications and further negotiation. All
agreements resulting from negotiations that differ from what is represented within the RFP
or in the proposal response shall be documented and included as part of the final contract.
F. SEALED PROPOSAL SUBMISSION
All proposals are due and must be delivered to the City on or before, August 11,
2026, at 2:00 p.m. (local time). Proposals submitted late or via oral, telephonic,
telegraphic, electronic mail or facsimile will not be considered or accepted.
Each offeror must submit in a sealed envelope marked Proposal:
4
• One (1) original proposal
• Six (6) additional proposal copies
• One (1) digital copy of the proposal preferably on a USB/flash drive as one file
in PDF format
Each offeror should submit in a single separate sealed envelope marked Fee Proposal:
• Two (2) copies of the fee proposal
The fee proposal and all costs should be separate from the rest of the proposal.
Proposals submitted should be clearly marked: “RFP No.26-39 – Zoning Code Rewrite
and Development Review Process Improvement” and list the offeror’s name and address.
Proposals must be addressed and delivered to:
City of Ann Arbor
c/o Customer Service
301 East Huron Street
Ann Arbor, MI 48104
All proposals received on or before the due date will be publicly opened and recorded on
the due date. No immediate decisions will be rendered.
Hand delivered proposals may be dropped off in the Purchasing drop box located in the
Ann Street (north) vestibule/entrance of City Hall which is open to the public Monday
through Friday from 8am to 5pm (except holidays). The City will not be liable to any
prospective offeror for any unforeseen circumstances, delivery, or postal delays.
Postmarking on the due date will not substitute for receipt of the proposal. Offerors are
responsible for submission of their proposal. Additional time will not be granted to a single
prospective offeror. However, additional time may be granted to all prospective offerors
at the discretion of the City.
A proposal may be disqualified if the following required forms are not included with the
proposal:
Attachment B - Non-Discrimination Ordinance Declaration of Compliance
Attachment C - Living Wage Ordinance Declaration of Compliance
Attachment D - Vendor Conflict of Interest Disclosure Form
Proposals that fail to provide these forms listed above upon proposal opening may be
deemed non-responsive and may not be considered for award.
Please provide the forms outlined above (Attachments B, C and D) within the envelope
marked Proposal, not within the separately sealed Fee Proposal envelope.
All proposed fees, cost or compensation for the services requested herein should be
provided in the separately sealed Fee Proposal envelope only.
G. DISCLOSURES
Under the Freedom of Information Act (Public Act 442), the City is obligated to permit
review of its files, if requested by others. All information in a proposal is subject to
5
This is the opportunity summary page. It provides an overview of this opportunity and a preview of the attached documentation.