and all authorities having jurisdiction, including but not limited to, the State of Idaho Division of
Building Safety and Office of the State Fire Marshal. The final plans should at a minimum
include: a code study addressing penetration of fire rated walls; plan configuration; dimensions;
details including mechanical, electrical, and plumbing design to include all fixtures, systems,
equipment, required calculations, energy and performance data, systems review, coordination and
integration into all utilities and controls.
3. The Design-Build Team will be required to upload all documents to DPW’s Owner’s web-based
project management system, Projectmates. Documents may include, but are not limited to meeting
minutes, sketches, diagrams, existing system analysis, design phase submittals including drawings
and project manuals, photographs relevant to the project, construction submittals, field reports,
schedules, cost estimates, ASI’s, RFI’s, close out documents, warranties, etc.
4. A compete construction schedule and cost estimate will be required following the Design Phase for
final Owner approval prior to proceeding to the Construction Phase. This estimate, when approved,
will become the Guaranteed Max Price (GMP) of the construction contract.
5. Develop all necessary materials and make a minimum of one (1) presentation to the Permanent
Building Fund Advisory Council (PBFAC).
6. Securing all building and trade permits for construction through the State of Idaho Division of
Building Safety.
7. Construction and construction administration by the Builder as well as the Architect/Engineers of
Record. Construction administration will also include conferences, weekly site observations and
progress meetings with the Agency and DPW.
8. All work shall be in accordance with currently adopted building, fire, accessibility, and energy
codes.
9. Development and refinement of cost estimates and project schedules throughout the design phase.
10.Project Closeout, establishment of warranties, guarantees and owner training.
QUALIFICATION STATEMENT CONTENT
A. Basic Qualifications: Maximum four (4) pages; twenty (20) points
1. Provide basic data related to the Design-Build Team’s companies/firms, including the General
contractor, the Architect-of-record, and the Plumbing, Mechanical, and Electrical Engineers of
record.
a. Provide company’s age, size, location, and general information.
b. Provide number of personnel and resources available to meet the project schedule.
B. Specific Team Member Qualifications: Maximum eight (8) pages; twenty-two (22) points
3DJHRI
1. Provide a one-page resume with specific qualifications for each team member expected to
accomplish the work (points allocated below). Each resume should include the individual’s
education, training, certifications, or other qualifications which show the person’s ability to
complete projects of this scope and/or type. Were applicable provide Idaho license type and
number. Provide up to 5 examples of similar work completed in the past ten years. Include the
location, and the current phase of design or construction.
a. Design-Builder/General Contractor (Project Manager, Superintendent, etc): Maximum
five (10) points
b. Architect of Record: Maximum two (3) points
c. Mechanical Engineer: Maximum two (3) points
d. Plumbing Engineering: Maximum two (3) points
e. Electrical and Low Voltage Engineering: Maximum two (3) points
C. Project Approach: Maximum four (4) pages; twenty-six (26) points
1. Describe the Team’s approach for assessing the existing mechanical systems and designing
a solution for this project, including the concepts below. Give examples where appropriate.
Maximum nine (9) points
a. Understanding of the existing mechanical systems and current failures.
b. Possible design and construction challenges that the Team foresees.
c. Design opportunities and/or concepts that the Team may explore.
2. Describe the Team’s management approach for this project, including the concepts below.
Give examples where appropriate. Maximum nine (9) points
a. Quality control of construction documents.
b. Document coordination between consultants.
c. Process and tools for creating and managing the schedule.
d. Process and tools for creating and managing the construction cost estimate within
budget.
e. Methods for managing Owner/Agency expectations.
f. Methods for gathering stakeholder’s input and acceptance.
g. Relationships and interactions with local utility companies and authorities having
jurisdiction.
3. Describe the Team’s approach to construction administration, including the concepts below.
Give examples where appropriate. Maximum eight (8) points
a. Hierarchy and turnaround time for information distribution (i.e. meeting agendas. and
minutes, submittals, RFIs, PRs, change orders, etc.)
b. Process for monitoring the construction schedule.
c. Expectations for Architect, Plumbing, Mechanical, and Electrical Engineer’s
involvement during CA.
d. Problem solving skills for unforeseen conditions.
e. Experience with Owner’s web based project management system, Projectmates.
D. Format: Maximum two (2) points
3DJHRI
1. To assist reviewers in their evaluation of submittals, it is preferable for submittals to follow the
format of the headings (A-C) listed above. Proposals should be clear and concise. Emphasis
should be placed on specific qualifications of the people who will actually perform the work.
2. All content should be contained in the submittal. No external means of information (i.e. brochures
or QR codes) will be considered.
3. Submittals must include the name of the team’s primary contact, phone number, and email address
on the cover letter. Failure to provide this information may result in the proposal being
nonresponsive.
SUBMITTAL
Submit five (5) copies of the submittal; include one USB drive containing a PDF of the submittal.
EVALUATION, FINAL RANKING, INTERVIEW PROCESS
A selection committee consisting of two (2) representatives from DPW, two (2) representatives from
Department of Lands, and an independent Design Builder will evaluate and rank the firms deemed to be
the most highly qualified to perform the required services.
The ranking process is accomplished in two steps: 70 points for the Initial Ranking based on the written
submittal, and 30 points for a Final Ranking based on an interview. The selection committee will score the
written submittals based on the criteria in the Qualification Statement Content and up to three (3) teams
will be invited for an interview. The scores will be based on the tables below.
Initial Ranking, Written Point Scoring
Criteria
Maximum
Possible Points
A Basic Qualifications
20
B Team Member Qualifications
22
C Approach to Project
26
D Format
2
Written Total
70
Presentation/Interview Point Scoring
Criteria
Maximum
Possible Points
Competency and ability to address the items
15
that will be provided to the final ranked
teams
Selection Committee’s Q & A
15
Presentation/Interview Total
30
3DJHRI
This is the opportunity summary page. It provides an overview of this opportunity and a preview of the attached documentation.