Coaching Coordinator Leadership Development

Location: Ohio
Posted: Dec 1, 2025
Due: Dec 15, 2025
Agency: State Government of Ohio
Type of Government: State & Local
Category:
  • U - Education and Training Services
Solicitation No: SRC0000035371
Publication URL: To access bid details, please log in.
Solicitation ID: SRC0000035371
Solicitation Name: Coaching Coordinator Leadership Development
Original Begin Date: 12/1/2025 12:00:00 AM
Begin Date: 12/1/2025 12:00:00 AM
End Date: 12/15/2025 1:00:00 PM
Inquiry End Date: 12/11/2025 1:00:00 PM
Commodity: Training planning, facilitation and delivery services
MBE Set Aside: MBE Set Aside
Agency: EDU-DEPT EDUCATION AND WORKFORCE
Solicitation Status: Open for Bidding
Solicitation Type: Request For Proposal (RFP) (Double Envelope)

Solicitation General Information
In an MBE set-aside solicitation, only those bidders/suppliers with an active MBE certification at the time the solicitation closes can submit a response
Solicitation ID
SRC0000035371
Solicitation Name
Coaching Coordinator Leadership Development
RFx Type
Request For Proposal (RFP) (Double Envelope)
Lot #
1
Solicitation Status
Open for Bidding
Round #
1
MBE Set Aside
Begin Date
12/1/2025 12:00:00 AM (ET)
Amendment?
End Date
12/15/2025 1:00:00 PM (ET)
Inquiry End Date
12/11/2025 1:00:00 PM
Summary

The Ohio Department of Education and Workforce, requires an experienced Offeror to develop tools and resources to support coaches and ensure consistent implementation of Ohio’s Model for Instructional Coaching for Literacy .

Predecessor Contract
Process

Proposals and supporting documentation must be submitted via OhioBuys for consideration.

To participate or submit an inquiry for this solicitation, prospective Offerors must be registered via the OhioBuys Supplier Portal. Click the following link to initiate this process Selling to the State
Please include a completed copy of the Offeror acknowledgements and current agreements disclosure form in the final submission.

OhioBuys training materials can be located at Supplier Resources

Help. Should technical support be required during the submission process please contact (614) 466-5090. This is for technical support only and shall not be utilized to submit inquiries related to the solicitation contents.

Browser. Chrome is the preferred browser for OhioBuys and having only a single window open and logged in will reduce errors during the submission process.

Supplier Contact Information. Suppliers must indicate the following contact information (name and email) within their quote for individuals who the department should engage with for the following:

  1. Contract Negotiation (terms and conditions)
  2. Scope of work
  3. Invoicing and purchase orders
Ship To
Contracting Entity
EDU-DEPT EDUCATION AND WORKFORCE
1 Record(s)
0 Record(s)
Solicitation Documents
Keywords
Search Reset
Title Type Att. Validity End Date Validity End Date
35371-Cost Proposal Form Public Solicitation Documents (Approved)
Literacy Coaching Implementation Playbook Public Solicitation Documents (Approved)
35371Coaching Coordinator Support RFP Public Solicitation Documents (Approved)
DEW Offeror Current Agreements Disclosure Public Solicitation Documents (Approved)
DEW Offeror Redaction Form Public Solicitation Documents (Approved)
RFP Proposal Scoring Evaluation Documents (Approved)
6 Record(s)

Attachment Preview

Evaluation Metrics
Background
During the evaluation process, the evaluation team reviews and rates Proposals based on the
metrics and the weight assigned to each metric. This can be found in the RFP document
“Evaluation Criterion” for specific metric and assigned weight.
MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS
If the metrics contain Mandatory Requirements, those portions of the Proposals are reviewed
first, and only Proposals meeting the Mandatory Requirements may continue to the technical
and cost Proposal review. Mandatory Requirements are pass/fail.
SCORING BREAKDOWN
The Offeror with the highest combined total score will be recommended for the next phase of
the evaluation process.
Criteria
Available Points
Technical Requirements
Weight Total *5
Cost
Cost Weight *5
Maximum Available
Total of Technical + Cost Points
Technical Proposal Scoring
The scale in the below table (0-5) will be used to rate each Proposal on the technical metrics
listed in the RFP “Evaluation Criterion”. DEW will score a Proposal by multiplying the score
received in each category by its assigned weight and adding all categories for the Offeror’s
technical score. Numerical values are defined as follows.
Numerical
Rating
5
4
Adjective
Excellent
Very Good
Description
• Response demonstrates an approach do the proposed work
with an exceptional solution or level of quality
• Response contains significant strengths and few minor
weaknesses, if any.
• There is very little risk that the Offeror would fail to satisfy
the requirement(s).
• Response demonstrates an approach offering unique or
innovative methods of performing the proposed work or
delivering a solution.
1 | Solicitation Attachment |
Numerical
Rating
Adjective
Description
• Response contains many strengths that outweigh the
weaknesses. Weaknesses, if any, are very minor and can be
easily corrected.
• There is little risk that the Offeror would fail to satisfy the
requirement(s).
• Response demonstrates an approach that offers an
acceptable solution or level of quality.
3
Acceptable
•
Response contains strengths that are balanced by the
weaknesses. Weaknesses are minor and can be corrected.
• There is some probability of risk that the Offeror may fail to
satisfy some of the requirement(s).
• Response demonstrates an approach that inadequately
addresses the requirements and/or objectives.
• Response contains weaknesses that are not offset by
2
Weak
strengths. There are significant weaknesses and very few
strengths.
• There are questions about the likelihood of success and
there is a risk that the Offeror may fail to satisfy the
requirement(s).
• Response demonstrates an approach that does not meet
the stated requirements and/or objectives, lacks essential
information, is conflicting, and/or is unproductive.
1
Poor • Response contains many significant weaknesses and very
minor strengths, if any.
• There is not a reasonable likelihood of success and high risk
that the Offeror would fail to satisfy the requirement(s).
• Response is missing necessary information to demonstrate
0
Completely
Deficient
•
•
that the Offeror can perform.
Response is devoid of strengths.
Response has an unacceptable level of risk that the Offeror
will fail to satisfy the requirement(s).
Cost Scoring
The Offeror with the lowest cost will receive the maximum cost score available. The remaining
Offerors will receive a percentage of the maximum cost points available based upon the
following formula:
Cost Score = (lowest proposed cost/Offeror’s proposed cost) x maximum points available
2 | Solicitation Attachment | 2024
This is the opportunity summary page. It provides an overview of this opportunity and a preview of the attached documentation.
Daily notification on new contract opportunities

With GovernmentContracts, you can:

  • Find more opportunities and win more business
  • Receive daily alerts for all new bid opportunities
  • Get contract opportunities matched to your business
ONE WEEK FREE TRIAL

See also

RFQ for Professional Coaching...

...Solicitation ID: SRC0000032514 Solicitation Name: RFQ for Professional Coaching Services Original... submit a ...

State Government of Ohio

Bid Due: 6/30/2026

* Disclaimer: Information regarding bids, requests for proposals (RFPs), or requests for qualifications (RFQs) is provided on this website only for convenience and does not constitute official public notice. Persons wishing to respond to or inquire about bids, RFPs, or RFQs should contact the appropriate government department.
© 2000-2026 GovernmentContracts. All rights reserved.