Z1DA-- 529-22-101 Replace Bldg. #7 Master Control Panel

Active

Contract Opportunity

Whether the submission of Standard Form 1442, Bid Guarantee, and completed Representations and Certifications alone constitutes a complete proposal, or if additional responses to the seven evaluation factors on Page 10 are required.

Proposals must include the documents listed in the solicitation, and the proposal price must be included on the Standard Form 1442.

These document alone do not constitute a complete proposal. Offerors must clearly demonstrate how they meet the technical acceptability criteria listed on page 10 and 11 of the solicitation. The technical portion will be evaluated on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis. Past performance is included in the criteria for technical acceptability.

Whether detailed instructions for the proposal s format and content will be provided, or if there are specific guidelines we should follow that were not included in the solicitation

Proposals should clearly demonstrate how they meet the Technical Acceptability criteria on page 10 and 11 of the solicitation. Proposals will NOT be ranked, only given a rating of Acceptable or Unacceptable based on information provided in the proposal.

I have been reviewing the solicitation documents for the above-referenced project. I am having a hard time finding the proposal instructions on what should be submitted as part of our technical proposal. This is all I found:
In order to be effectively and equitably evaluated, the proposals must include information sufficiently detailed to clearly describe the offeror's Technical Ability, Past Performance, and Price, to successfully complete the project. I do not see where it is identified as to what we are required to submit under technical ability and past performance.
Award will be made to the lowest offeror deemed technically acceptable based on the factors below. This just looks like evaluation criteria.

The technical portion will be evaluated on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis. Offerors must clearly demonstrate how they meet the criteria listed on page 10 and 11 of the solicitation. Past performance is included in the criteria for technical acceptability. Proposals will NOT be ranked, only evaluated for acceptability based on information provided in the proposal. Be advised this solicitation is being evaluated as Lowest Price Technically Acceptable as opposed to a tradeoff.

Regarding:Â Solicitation Pages 9 - 11: Sections 2 (Submittal of Proposals), 3 (Proposal Evaluation Process), and 4 (?). The solicitation states: "...the proposals must include information sufficiently detailed to clearly describe the offeror's Technical Ability, Past Performance, and Price, to successfully complete the project." "Offerors must comply with the detailed instructions for the format and content of the proposal. Proposals that do not comply with the detailed instructions may be rejected."
RFI:Â The solicitation appears to be missing the "detailed instructions for the format and content of the proposal". For example, there is no section for Past Performance, the Technical Ability section is currently assumed to be the Factor/Rating chart on Pages 10 and 11, and the Factor 3 - Price section starts at 4.3 (4.1 and 4.2 are missing, unless this is mis-numbered). Please provide the instructions or advise if the Offeror is simply to answer each of the Factor/Rating chart items in a question/answer format to be compliant.

The offeror is to address how they meet the technical acceptability criteria in their proposal. Detailed Instructions is holdover language and will not be addressed beyond what is already provided in the solicitation. The price section is mis-numbered and should read 3.5.

Regarding:Â Solicitation Pages 9 - 10: Section 2.3. The solicitation states: "Per federal regulation, a digital submission will not be considered late if it is submitted by close of business day prior to the submission due date. Any submission that arrives after the due date and time will be considered late regardless of the circumstance if it is not submitted by close of business the day prior. Close of business is defined by the FAR at 4:30 pm based off the time zone of the contracting office is located."
RFI:Â This appears to read that any proposal submitted on the actual due date of November 1, 2024, and before the due time of 3:00 PM ET will be considered late. Please advise if proposals submissions, in order to not be considered late, must be submitted by/before October 31, 2024, at 4:30 PM ET. We have never encountered this situation before. Normally, Offerors are permitted to submit up to the due date and time to be considered on-time.

Proposals won t be deemed late unless they are submitted after 3:00 PM on 11/1/24.

RFI:Â Please provide the FAR Clause that stipulates the "federal regulation" referenced above.

This is not a clause but is a part of the Federal Acquisition Regulation that we are held to. FAR 15.208(b)(1)(i) covers the submission guidelines referenced above. Proposals won t be deemed late unless they are submitted after 3:00 PM on 11/1/24 for this procurement.

Attachments/Links