MnDOT Contract No. 1063529
Exhibit A: Specifications, Duties, and Scope of Work
Introduction
MnDOT (the State) and WisDOT currently have a project in progress to replace the Blatnik Bridge connecting
Duluth, MN with Superior, WI. This bridge is expected to face numerous challenges over time, including
evolving freight demands and the impacts of climate change. Increased wind loads and severe snowstorms can
accelerate material deterioration, leading to higher maintenance requirements and potential disruptions in
regular operations. The State plans to implement a Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) system on the new
Blatnik Bridge, primarily the main navigational span section with consideration for its approach spans (inclusive
of the Howard’s Pocket spans), to preserve serviceability, safety, and sustainability of the bridge structure
throughout its lifespan.
The complex structural behavior of long span bridges under changing loading conditions requires a deeper
understanding to ensure public safety and structural reliability. The State’s primary goal in implementing this
SHM system is to leverage advanced sensing technologies developed over the past two decades to enable
informed decision making using both robust baseline and real-time data, ultimately enhancing public safety and
extending the structure’s service life.
The SHM system will serve as a decision-making tool for efficient operations, maintenance, and timely
preservation projects. Data collected from the system will be integrated with bridge inspection data and
complemented by engineering judgment to determine the most effective preventive maintenance strategies,
validate assumptions about the structure’s performance, and monitor the condition of key components over
time. Ultimately, this integration of technology ensures that the State can maintain the Blatnik Bridge as a safe,
reliable, and sustainable asset for decades to come.
The State desires to implement a remote, permanent or temporary, real-time, sensor-based SHM system
throughout the new Blatnik bridge that is expandable or replaceable over the life of the structure. Contractors
are expected to provide teams comprised of academia and consultants that understand bridge engineering,
monitoring, performance, and service life.
Upon completion of the project, the State will own all data collected and models developed. To ensure the
protection of sensitive project information and the accuracy of any public communication, the State will require
that all papers, articles, presentations, or other publications related to this project be submitted for prior review
and approval. This requirement helps prevent the inadvertent disclosure of information that is restricted due to
the security classification of the bridge.
This Contract will be administered in multiple phases. Phase I will be included in the initial contract budget.
Phases II and III will be negotiated and added to the Contract by formal amendments at the sole discretion of
the State. Phases for this work include:
• Phase I – Planning
• Phase II – Implementation
• Phase III – Short-Term Operation and Maintenance
Due to the design-build delivery, interested responders must adhere the following requirements related to
organizational conflicts of interest (see “Conflict of Interest” under the Laws and Policies section):
Design-Build Resources - MnDOT Design-Build Program
Draft - Blatnik Bridge Monitoring Scope of Work
1
MnDOT Contract No. 1063529
Exhibit A: Specifications, Duties, and Scope of Work
Project Background
Minnesota State Project (SP) 6981-26 on I-535 for Blatnik Bridge Replacement Design-Build Project is primarily
located in St. Louis County, Minnesota and Douglas County, Wisconsin between the cities of Duluth, Minnesota
and Superior, Wisconsin. The project limits extend 0.3 miles from the existing bridge structure on the
Minnesota approach to 0.75 miles from the existing bridge structure on the Wisconsin approach, along US 53.
The project is being delivered using the design-build delivery process. The project includes replacement of the
existing John. A. Blatnik I-535 Bridge (Minnesota Bridge number 9030, Wisconsin Structure B-16-5) on Interstate
535 (I-535) connecting Duluth, Minnesota and Superior, Wisconsin across the St. Louis River and Bay. The Bridge
Contractor for the project has not been selected yet, so it is unknown at this time what structure types will be
utilized. Preliminary design done to date suggests that a cable-stay or tied-arch structure will likely be utilized
for the main navigational spans, a steel I-girder unit will likely be used for the Howard’s Pocket spans, and the
remaining spans will likely be either prestressed concrete girders or steel I-girders. The project also includes
reconstructing an interchange in Superior, WI that connects I-535 directly to US 53, with local connections to
Hammond Avenue and WIS 35. The project includes design and construction of a new mainline bridge
(Minnesota Bridge number 69913, Wisconsin Structure B-16-0153) and new exit ramp bridge (WI Structure B-16-
0154) and entrance ramp bridge (WI Structure B-16-0155). The new mainline bridge includes several bridge
units:
1. The Bridge Unit(s) for I-535 mainline portions from the abutment in Minnesota to the Main Navigation
Channel Bridge Unit
2. Bridge Unit of the Main Navigation Channel over St. Louis River,
3. The Bridge Unit(s) along Conner’s Point between the Main Navigation Channel and Howard’s Pocket
Navigation Bridge Units
4. The Howard’s Pocket Navigation Channel Bridge Unit
5. The Bridge Unit(s) from the Howard’s Pocket Navigation Channel Bridge Unit to the mainline abutment
in Wisconsin.
The project includes a new shared use path on the easterly side of the new mainline bridge and Wisconsin
entrance ramp bridge with trail connections in Duluth and Superior, drainage improvements, retaining walls,
and improvements within the City of Superior. The existing bridge will be closed for most of the construction,
and traffic will be detoured to the Richard I. Bong Memorial Bridge (US-2 over the St. Louis River).
Approximate Project cost: The estimated cost of the Project is between $1.0 billion and $1.4 billion.
To find additional project information related to the Project, refer to the project website located here:
https://www.dot.state.mn.us/designbuild/blatnik-bridge/index.html
Project information such as design files, layouts and more can be found on the project SharePoint site, which is
found on the project website. Download and review all files on the project SharePoint site.
The State anticipates a minimum of five-year duration for this contract. The State anticipates the work may
extend past 5 years, which may result in a subsequent contract being set up.
Draft - Blatnik Bridge Monitoring Scope of Work
2
MnDOT Contract No. 1063529
Exhibit A: Specifications, Duties, and Scope of Work
Definitions:
• BMP: Bridge Monitoring Plan - framework based on monitoring goals and strategies for how the
monitoring will be conducted.
• DBC: Design-Build Contractor - The single entity that manages both the design and construction of a
project under one contract.
• DBVO: the State’s Design-Build Verification Oversight.
• PM: Project Manager – Primary contact person for the contractor.
• QMP: Quality Management Plan – Document describing how the contractor will ensure completeness
and accuracy of submittals.
• SHM: Structural Health Monitoring – reference to the entire SMS along with analysis and monitoring
• SMS: Structural Monitoring System - the hardware and software used to collect the data required by the
BMP.
• Structural Health Evaluation System: framework for the detection and assessment damage in the
structure. It includes built‑in reporting.
Task 1: Project Management
Project Administration
The State will provide a Project Manager (PM) to direct the Contractor’s activities. It will be the responsibility of
the State’s Project Manager to receive the work produced by Contractor, facilitate the review of the work for
accuracy and compliance with State standards, and to recommend payment for such work.
Contractor will conduct the administration of the project, which will include communication with the State,
invoicing, preparation of any necessary supplemental agreements, cost and schedule updates, and other non-
technical work.
The contractor’s PM is responsible for managing the consultant contract and its personnel. Additional
responsibilities may be assigned to various contract personnel who have been approved by the State as the
Project Manager deems necessary. The PM will manage the development and submission of the contract
deliverables, communicate with the State on contract deliverables, submit minutes of meetings, ensure
completion and submittal of contract deliverables according to the submission schedule provided in the Scope
of Work, respond to comments from the State on submittals, and coordinate the training of State staff on
operations and maintenance of the final implemented Blatnik SHM and Bridge Monitoring Plan Workshop.
No changes in Contractor’s project management or key personnel will be permitted without prior written notice
to and written acceptance from the State’s Project Manager. The State will notify Contractor immediately if
there are changes to State’s assigned project management personnel.
Meetings
Co-location is not required of the PM; however, the PM must be on-site for meetings as requested by the State’s
Project Manager and may be required to identify and provide an individual to attend anticipated meetings
throughout the duration of the contract.
Kick-Off Meeting: the Contractor will participate in a virtual kick-off meeting. The meeting will establish
communication protocol for the project, discuss workshop deliverables and planning, review design
Draft - Blatnik Bridge Monitoring Scope of Work
3
MnDOT Contract No. 1063529
Exhibit A: Specifications, Duties, and Scope of Work
documentation available, discuss known project issues and needs, and review the project schedule. Assume a 2-
hour meeting duration.
Progress Meetings: Contractor will facilitate monthly progress review meetings to coordinate specific tasks and
provide project updates with State staff. Assume 1-hour virtual meeting durations. State anticipates a multi-
functional group of participants involved with these meetings through the duration of the contract. The
frequency of meetings may fluctuate throughout the contract based on project requirements. However, the
Contractor may account for a minimum of two meetings per month during Phase I, and monthly meetings
during Phases II and III.
Comment Resolution Meetings: Contractor will plan on a minimum of 8 comment resolution meetings (one
meeting per draft deliverable) throughout the duration of the project. Assume 1-hour virtual meeting durations.
When possible, combine these meetings with Progress Meetings.
Bridge Monitoring Plan workshop Meeting: The Contractor will facilitate a full-day, hybrid Bridge Monitoring
Plan workshop to review findings, evaluate monitoring options, and develop the framework for the Bridge
Monitoring Plan as described in Task 2.
Training Meeting: The Contractor will facilitate a training session on the operation, functionality and
troubleshooting of the Data Management System User Interface as described in Task 6. This training may take
place virtually. The meeting should be of sufficient length to cover all applicable use of the user interface and
key elements of the system.
Project coordination with Design-Build Contractor
The Contractor will collaborate continually with the DBC and the State for schedule, identifying hold points,
being accessible in short notice to accommodate DBC work, identifying access needs, and work duration. Include
coordination steps with DBC and timelines for installation. The Contractor will be required to provide a
dedicated individual to attend regular scheduled, in-person meetings as required based on construction
schedule and topics of the meetings. This individual is required to be one of the key personnel. The state will
ensure that a 3-week look-ahead will be provided regularly by the DBC to help the Contractor understand which
meetings should be attended. The state will facilitate meeting attendance coordination between the Contractor
and the DB Contractor.
The Contractor will be required to communicate and collaborate with the DBC during the planning task to
ensure sensor locations are properly identified within the proposed bridge sections. Update the BMP when final
plan details are provided by the DBC as necessary to accurately show the details.
DB contractor will provide access to the contractor for the Implementation of the Structural Monitoring System
during construction. The state anticipates that access to the bridge will be arranged by the contractor after
opening to traffic.
Schedule
Contractor will develop a baseline schedule based on the Task descriptions and tentative due dates listed
throughout. A draft schedule will be presented at the kick-off meeting and finalized as discussed in Deliverables.
Quality Management Plan
Contractor will develop a project specific QMP for the project. Contractor will update the QMP as necessary at
State’s request. The QMP will specify how Contractor will perform Quality Assurance (QA) and Quality Control
Draft - Blatnik Bridge Monitoring Scope of Work
4
MnDOT Contract No. 1063529
Exhibit A: Specifications, Duties, and Scope of Work
(QC) activities throughout the duration of the project to ensure delivery of a quality product in a timely manner
that conforms to established contract requirements.
The QMP will be provided to State within 5 days of NTP.
Contractor is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of its work. All deliverables must be
independently checked and reconciled prior to submittal to State. Review comments from State on
Contractor’s various submittals does not relieve the Contractor of liability for inaccurate or incomplete
work.
With each submittal, Contractor must supply a comment resolution document with response to all State
review comments. Response to all State comments must be well documented and provided with each
resubmission of a deliverable.
At the request of State, Contractor must supply electronic copies of completed QA/QC “check prints” of
various documents.
Key Personnel
Key personnel beyond the PM will be described in the Request for Proposals (RFP). A general description is
included at the end of this document to facilitate understanding of anticipated personnel requirements.
Task 1 Deliverables
• Baseline Schedule
• Quality Management Plan
• Meeting minutes
Phase I Planning
The Contractor will assist the State in determining monitoring goals and strategies to develop a comprehensive,
yet manageable, Bridge Monitoring Plan (BMP). The BMP must capture the behavior of key components of the
structures to be monitored. The contractor will use the approved BMP to develop detailed design plans and
material procurement specifications for installation.
This plan will be developed collaboratively with the Contractor, the State, the DBC, and the State’s Design-Build
Verification Oversight (DBVO) team.
During Phase 1, the State will determine the extent of SHM components to include in Phase 2, considering
further study and any innovation(s) proposed by the Contractor’s team.
Task 2: Monitoring Goals and Strategies
The Contractor will assist the State in establishing monitoring goals and strategies for the development of a
Bridge Monitoring Plan. The intention of this task is to ensure a common understanding of the State’s objectives
while providing a road map for the development of a more detailed plan in Task 3 and subsequent Phases.
Draft - Blatnik Bridge Monitoring Scope of Work
5
This is the opportunity summary page. It provides an overview of this opportunity and a preview of the attached documentation.