General Litigation Emergency Counsel

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

For

GENERAL LITIGATION & EMERGENCY COUNSEL

Issued by

THE GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

RFP NUMBER:

OGC-2026-14

DATE OF ISSUANCE

April 13, 2026

The Issuing Office and the Bureau of Diversity, Inclusion and Small Business Opportunities (BDISBO) have set an SDB/VBE Participation Goal for this RFP. This is a significant programmatic change from the SDB and SB Participation program contained in prior best value solicitations issued by the Commonwealth. Law Firms now must agree to meet the SDB/VBE Participation Goal in full or demonstrate they have made Good Faith Efforts to meet the Goals. Important information regarding these new programs is set forth in Parts I-12, II-3, II-4, and IV-5 of the RFP and Appendices G, H and I.

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR

General Litigation & Emergency Counsel

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

Governor’s Office of General Counsel

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CALENDAR OF EVENTS 3 PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION 4

PART II - PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS 11

PART III - CRITERIA FOR SELECTION 14

PART IV - WORK STATEMENT 17

PART V - STANDARD CONTRACT FOR LEGAL SERVICES

APPENDIX A – PROPOSAL COVER SHEET

APPENDIX B – COST SUBMITTAL

APPENDIX C – TRADE SECRET CONFIDENTIAL PROPRIETARY INFORMATION

NOTICE

APPENDIX D – STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS/CONFLICTS/TECHNICAL

QUESTIONNAIRE

APPENDIX E – PERSONNEL EXPERIENCE BY KEY POSITION

APPENDIX F – PROJECT REFERENCES

APPENDIX G – SMALL DIVERSE BUSINESS PARTICIPATION SUMMARY SHEET

AND ATTACHMENTS

APPENDIX H – VETERAN BUSINESS ENTERPRISE PARTICIPATION SUMMARY

SHEET AND ATTACHMENTS

APPENDIX I – MODEL FORM OF SDB AND VBE SUBCONTRACTOR AGREEMENT

CALENDAR OF EVENTS

The Commonwealth will make every effort to adhere to the following schedule:

Deadline to submit Questions via email to: Jordan Kiessling @ jkiessling@pa.gov	Interested Law Firms	4/22/2026 4:00 p.m.
Answers to Potential Law Firm questions posted to the DGS PA eMarketplace website no later than this date.	Issuing Office	4/23/2026 4:00 p.m.
Please monitor website for all communications regarding the RFP.	Interested Law Firms	ONGOING
Sealed proposals must be received by the Issuing Office at: jkiessling@pa.gov	Interested Law Firms	5/7/2026 4:00 p.m.

PART I

GENERAL INFORMATION

I-1. Purpose. This request for proposals (RFP) provides to those Law Firms interested in submitting proposals for the subject procurement (“Law Firms”) sufficient information to enable them to prepare and submit proposals for the Governor’s Office of General Counsel’s consideration on behalf of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (“Commonwealth”) to satisfy a need for litigation and other urgent legal services that may arise on an ad hoc basis. Specifically, Executive Order 2015-2 provides that legal service or legal consultant contracts shall be awarded on a sole source basis only when it is clearly not feasible to utilize competitive bidding because of an urgency of need or other documented circumstances. Executive Order 2015-2 further provides that the Governor’s Office of General Counsel should develop a competitively bid list of pre-approved outside counsel for emergency situations.

If your firm was awarded a legal services contract as a result of RFP OGC-2024-02, you do not need to reapply to this new solicitation. The purpose of this RFP is to supplement the already existing list of competitively bid pre-approved outside counsel for emergency situations.

At various times, the Commonwealth or one of its agencies has been required to take exigent legal action or defend itself against litigation. The Office of General Counsel has issued this RFP to select standing legal counsel(s) to aid in such emergent legal matters. For purposes of this RFP, the Commonwealth will be making a limited multiple award to the highest evaluated Firms based upon the criteria set forth in this RFP.

This RFP is issued pursuant to Executive Order 2015-2 dated January 20, 2015, and in accordance with Section 518 of the Commonwealth Procurement Code, 62 P.S. § 518 and Part III Chapter 8 of the DGS Procurement Handbook.

I-2. Issuing Office. The Governor’s Office of General Counsel (“Issuing Office”) has issued this RFP on behalf of the Commonwealth. The sole point of contact in the Commonwealth for this RFP shall be:

Mrs. Jordan M. Kiessling, Issuing Officer

Governor’s Office of General Counsel

30 N. Third Street, Suite 200

Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17101

jkiessling@pa.gov

Please refer all inquiries to the Issuing Officer.

I-3. Scope. This RFP contains instructions governing the requested proposals, including the requirements for the information and material to be included; a description of the service to be provided; requirements which Law Firms must meet to be eligible for consideration; general evaluation criteria; and other requirements specific to this RFP.

I-4. Problem Statement. The Governor’s Office of General Counsel (“OGC”) has identified a need for general litigation and other emergent legal services that may arise on an ad hoc basis. The engagement may include other general work as designated by the Governor’s Office of General Counsel. For purposes of this RFP, the Commonwealth will be making a limited multiple award to the highest evaluated Law Firms based upon the criteria set forth in this RFP.

Additional detail is provided in Part IV of this RFP.

I-5. Type of Contract. It is proposed that if the Issuing Office enters into contracts as a result of this RFP, it will be a requirements contract with negotiated compensation containing the Contract Terms and Conditions as shown in Part V of the RFP. The Legal Services Contracts resulting from this RFP are intended to be state-wide contracts, housed with the Governor’s Office of General Counsel, for the benefit of the Executive Agencies under the jurisdiction of the Governor and agencies under the jurisdiction of the Governor’s Office of General Counsel. Awarded Law Firms may be called upon to provide legal services to any of the agencies under the Governor’s jurisdiction, more fully outlined in Part IV of this RFP. Awarded Law Firms with Legal Services Contracts as a result of this procurement who are issued an appointment letter by the General Counsel for an engagement once it arises would then work with the agency identified in the cause of action. All of the Commonwealth’s Executive Agencies will be permitted to issue a notice to proceed off of the aforementioned awarded state-wide contract for purposes of the appointed engagement.

I-6 Rejection of Proposals. The Issuing Office reserves the right, in its sole and complete discretion, to reject any proposal received as a result of this RFP.

I-7. Incurring Costs. The Issuing Office is not liable for any costs the Law Firm incurs in preparation and submission of its proposal, in participating in the RFP process or in anticipation of award of the contract.

I-8. Questions & Answers. If a Law Firm has any questions regarding this RFP, the Law Firm must submit the questions by email (with the subject line “OGC-2026-14 Question”) to the Issuing Officer named in Part I, Section I-2 of the RFP. If the Law Firm has questions, they must be submitted via email no later than the date indicated on the Calendar of Events. The Law Firm shall not attempt to contact the Issuing Officer by any other means. The Issuing Office shall post the answers to the questions on the PA eMarketplace website by the date stated on the Calendar of Events. A Law Firm who submits a question after the deadline date for receipt of questions indicated on the Calendar of Events assumes the risk that its proposal will not be responsive or competitive because the Commonwealth is not able to respond before the proposal receipt date or in sufficient time for the Law Firm to prepare a responsive or competitive proposal. When submitted after the deadline date for receipt of questions indicated on the Calendar of Events, the Issuing Officer may respond to questions of an administrative nature by directing the questioning Law Firm to specific provisions in the RFP.  To the extent that the Issuing Office decides to respond to a non-administrative question after the deadline date for receipt of questions indicated on the Calendar of Events, the answer must be provided to all Law Firms through an addendum.

All questions and responses as posted on the DGS website are considered as an addendum to, and part of, this RFP in accordance with RFP Part I, Section I-9. Each Law Firm shall be responsible to monitor the DGS website for new or revised RFP information. The Issuing Office shall not be bound by any verbal information nor shall it be bound by any written information that is not either contained within the RFP or formally issued as an addendum by the Issuing Office. The Issuing Office does not consider questions to be a protest of the specifications or of the solicitation. The required protest process for Commonwealth procurements is described on the DGS website at:

https://www.dgs.pa.gov/Documents/Procurement%20Forms/Handbook/Pt1/Pt%20I%20Ch%2058%20Bid%20Protests.pdf

I-9. Addenda to the RFP. If the Issuing Office deems it necessary to revise any part of this RFP before the proposal response date, the Issuing Office will post an addendum to the PA eMarketplace website. It is the Law Firm’s responsibility to periodically check the website for any new information or addenda to the RFP. Answers to the questions asked during the Questions & Answers period also will be posted to the website as an addendum to the RFP.

I-10. Response Date. To be considered for selection, electronic copies of proposals must arrive at the Issuing Office on or before the time and date specified in the RFP Calendar of Events. The Issuing Office will not accept proposals via facsimile transmission.

I-11. Proposals. To be considered, Law Firms should submit a complete response to this RFP to the Issuing Office, using the format provided in Part II. The Law Firm must provide in three (3) separate attachments, a copy of the Technical Submittal, a copy of the Cost Submittal and a copy of the Small Diverse Business (“SDB”) Participation Submittal (which may include the SDB Utilization Schedule, Good Faith Efforts Documentation to Support Waiver Request, or both) AND/OR a copy of the Veteran Business Enterprise (“VBE”) Participation Submittal (which may include the VBE Utilization Schedule, Good Faith Efforts Documentation to Support Waiver Request, or both).

Law Firms should ensure that there is no costing information in the Technical Submittal. Law Firms should not reiterate technical information in the cost submittal. The Law Firm shall make no other distribution of its proposal to any other Law Firm or Commonwealth official or Commonwealth Law Firm. Each proposal page should be numbered for ease of reference. An official authorized to bind the Law Firm to its provisions must sign the proposal. If the official signs the Proposal Cover Sheet (Appendix A to this RFP) and the Proposal Cover Sheet is attached to the Law Firm’s proposal, the requirement will be met. For this RFP, the proposal must remain valid for 120 days or until a contract is fully executed. If the Issuing Office selects the Law Firm’s proposal for award, the contents of the selected Law Firm’s proposal will become, except to the extent the contents are changed through Best and Final Offers or negotiations, contractual obligations.

Each Law Firm submitting a proposal specifically waives any right to withdraw or modify it, except that the Law Firm may withdraw its proposal by written notice received at the Issuing Office’s address for proposal delivery prior to the exact hour and date specified for proposal receipt. A Law Firm may modify its submitted proposal prior to the exact hour and date set for proposal receipt only by submitting a new sealed proposal or sealed modification which complies with the RFP requirements.

I-12. Small Diverse Business and Veteran Business Enterprise Information. Small Diverse Businesses (SDB) and Veteran Business Enterprises (VBE) are encouraged to respond to this solicitation. If you haven’t verified as an SDB or VBE within Pennsylvania, you may miss out on contracting opportunities designed to increase the Commonwealth’s spending with SDBs and VBEs. These opportunities will be available for goods, services, information technology services and products, as well as design, engineering and construction contracts. For this RFP, the Commonwealth will only consider commitments for the provision of professional or para-professional services towards the SDB participation goal and the VBE participation goal.

To review SDB and VBE program eligibility and for more information on seeking certification, please visit www.dgs.pa.gov and follow the links to “Small Diverse Business” located under the “Businesses” heading. Direct customer assistance is also available from staff within the Bureau of Diversity, Inclusion, and Small Business Opportunities by calling 717-783-3119 or via email at gs-bdisbo@pa.gov.

I-13. Economy of Preparation. Law Firms should prepare proposals simply and economically, providing a straightforward, concise description of the Law Firm's ability to meet the requirements of the RFP.

I-14. Alternative Proposals. The Issuing Office has identified the basic approach to meeting its requirements, allowing Law Firms to be creative and propose their best solution to meeting these requirements. The Issuing Office will not accept alternative technical proposals but, as provided in Section II-5 and Appendix B, will consider alternative cost proposals.

I-15. Clarifications. Law Firms may be required to make an oral or written clarification of their proposals to the Issuing Office to ensure thorough mutual understanding and Law Firm's responsiveness to the solicitation requirements. The Issuing Office will initiate requests for clarification. Clarifications may occur at any stage of the evaluation and selection process.

I-16. Prime Contractor Responsibilities. The contract will require the selected Law Firm to assume responsibility for all services offered in its proposal whether it produces them itself or by subcontract. The Issuing Office will consider the selected Law Firm to be the sole point of contact with regard to contractual matters.

I-17. Proposal Contents.

A. Confidential Information. The Commonwealth is not requesting, and does not require, confidential proprietary information or trade secrets to be included as part of any Law Firms’ submissions in order to evaluate proposals submitted in response to this RFP. Accordingly, except as provided herein, Law Firms should not label proposal submissions as confidential or proprietary or trade secret protected.  Any Law Firm who determines that it must divulge such information as part of its proposal must submit the signed written statement described in subsection C. below and must additionally provide a redacted version of its proposal, which removes only the confidential proprietary information and trade secrets, for required public disclosure purposes.

B. Commonwealth Use. All material submitted with the proposal shall be considered the property of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and may be returned only at the Issuing Office’s option. The Commonwealth has the right to use any or all ideas not protected by intellectual property rights that are presented in any proposal regardless of whether the proposal becomes part of a contract. Notwithstanding any Law Firm copyright designations contained on proposals, the Commonwealth shall have the right to make copies and distribute proposals internally and to comply with public record or other disclosure requirements under the provisions of any Commonwealth or United States statute or regulation, or rule or order of any court of competent jurisdiction.

C. Public Disclosure. After the award of a contract pursuant to this RFP, all proposal submissions are subject to disclosure in response to a request for public records made under the Pennsylvania Right-to-Know-Law, 65 P.S. § 67.101, et seq. If a proposal submission contains confidential proprietary information or trade secrets, a signed written statement to this effect must be provided with the submission in accordance with 65 P.S. § 67.707(b) for the information to be considered exempt under 65 P.S. § 67.708(b)(11) from public records requests. Refer to Appendix C of the RFP for a Trade Secret Form that may be utilized as the signed written statement, if applicable.

I-18. Discussions. While not required, the Issuing Office reserves the right to conduct discussions with any responsible Law Firm to determine the Law Firm’s qualifications for further consideration. Discussions shall not disclose any information derived from proposals submitted by other Law Firms.

I-19. News Releases. Law Firms shall not issue news releases, Internet postings, advertisements or any other public communications pertaining to this Engagement without prior written approval of the Issuing Office, and then only in coordination with the Issuing Office.

I-20. Restriction of Contact. From the issue date of this RFP until the Issuing Office selects a proposal for award, the Issuing Officer is the sole point of contact concerning this RFP. Any violation of this condition may be cause for the Issuing Office to reject the offending Law Firm’s proposal. If the Issuing Office later discovers that the Law Firm has engaged in any violations of this condition, the Issuing Office may reject the offending Law Firm's proposal or rescind its contract award. Law Firms must agree not to distribute any part of their proposals beyond the Issuing Office. A Law Firm who shares information contained in its proposal with other Commonwealth personnel and/or competing Law Firm personnel may be disqualified.

I-21. Issuing Office Participation. Law Firms shall provide all services, supplies, facilities, and other support necessary to complete the identified work. The Issuing Office will not provide office space or logistical support.

I-22. Term of Contract. The term of the contract will commence on the Effective Date and will end one (1) year from the Effective Date. The Commonwealth may renew the Contract for up to an additional two (2) years, in single or multiple year increments.

I-23. Law Firm’s Representations and Authorizations. By submitting its proposal, each Law Firm understands, represents, and acknowledges that:

A. All of the Law Firm's information and representations in the proposal are material and important, and the Issuing Office may rely upon the contents of the proposal in awarding the contract(s). The Commonwealth shall treat any misstatement, omission or misrepresentation as fraudulent concealment of the true facts relating to the Proposal submission, punishable pursuant to 18 Pa. C.S. § 4904.

B. The Law Firm has arrived at the price(s) and amounts in its proposal independently and without consultation, communication, or agreement with any other Law Firm or entity, except for subcontractors that the Law Firm plans to utilize for this contract.

C. The Law Firm has not disclosed any aspect of its proposal to any other entity, except for subcontractors that the Law Firm plans to utilize for this contract, and it shall not disclose any of these items on or before the proposal submission deadline applicable to this RFP.

D. The Law Firm has not attempted, nor will it attempt, to induce any firm or person to refrain from submitting a proposal on this contract, or to submit a proposal higher than this proposal, or to submit any intentionally high or noncompetitive proposal or other form of complementary proposal.

E. The Law Firm makes its proposal in good faith and not pursuant to any agreement or discussion with, or inducement from, any firm or person to submit a complementary or other noncompetitive proposal.

F. To the best knowledge of the person signing the proposal for the Law Firm, the Law Firm, its affiliates, subsidiaries, officers, directors, and employees are not currently under investigation by any governmental agency and have not in the last four years been convicted or found liable for any act prohibited by State or Federal law in any jurisdiction, involving conspiracy or collusion with respect to bidding or proposing on any public contract, except as the Law Firm has disclosed in its proposal.

G. To the best of the knowledge of the person signing the proposal for the Law Firm and except as the Law Firm has otherwise disclosed in its proposal, the Law Firm has no outstanding, delinquent obligations to the Commonwealth including, but not limited to, any state tax liability not being contested on appeal or other obligation of the Law Firm that is owed to the Commonwealth.

H. The Law Firm is not currently under suspension or debarment by the Commonwealth, any other state or the federal government, and if the Law Firm cannot so certify, then it shall submit along with its proposal a written explanation of why it cannot make such certification.

I. The Law Firm has not made, under separate contract with the Issuing Office, any recommendations to the Issuing Office concerning the need for the services described in its proposal or the specifications for the services described in the proposal.

J. Each Law Firm, by submitting its proposal, authorizes Commonwealth agencies to release to the Commonwealth information concerning the Law Firm's Pennsylvania taxes, unemployment compensation and workers’ compensation liabilities.

K. Once the Issuing Officer receives a fully signed Appointment letter back from the Law Firm, services can be performed, and Law Firm will be paid for services rendered dating back to the date of the Appointment letter.

I-24. Use of Electronic Versions of this RFP. This RFP is being made available by electronic means. If a Law Firm electronically accepts the RFP, the Law Firm acknowledges and accepts full responsibility to ensure that no changes are made to the RFP. In the event of a conflict between a version of the RFP in the Law Firm’s possession and the Issuing Office’s version of the RFP, the Issuing Office’s version shall govern.

[The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank.]

PART II

PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS

Law Firms must submit their proposals in the format, including heading descriptions, outlined below. To be considered, the proposal must respond to all requirements in this part of the RFP. Law Firms should provide any other information thought to be relevant, but not applicable to the enumerated categories, as an appendix to the Proposal. All cost data relating to this proposal and all Small Diverse Business/Veteran Business Enterprise cost data should be kept separate from and not included in the Technical Submittal. Each Proposal shall consist of the following three (3) separately attached submittals:

A. Technical Submittal, which shall be a response to RFP Part II, Section II-1;

B. SDB Participation Submittal (which may include the SDB Utilization Schedule, the Good Faith Efforts Documentation to Support Waiver Request, or both), in response to RFP Part II, Section II-3; OR

C. VBE Participation Submittal (which may include the VBE Utilization Schedule, the Good Faith Efforts Documentation to Support Waiver Request, or both), in response to RFP Part II, Section II-4; and

D. Cost Submittal, in response to RFP Part II, Section II-5.

** The SDB/VBE participation goal is set at 18% for this RFP. For this RFP, firms may choose to meet that 18% goal by agreeing to partner with EITHER a Small Diverse Business OR a Veteran Business Enterprise, OR a combination of both. Firm’s only need to submit EITHER the SDB Participation Submittal OR the VBE Participation Submittal. If choosing to partner with a combination of both an SDB and a VBE, you must submit both the SDB and VBE submittals**

The Issuing Office reserves the right to request additional information which, in the Issuing Office’s opinion, is necessary to assure that the Law Firm’s competence, number of qualified employees, business organization, and resources are adequate to perform according to the RFP.

The Issuing Office may make investigations as deemed necessary to determine the ability of the Law Firm to perform the Engagement and/or any potential conflicts the Law Firm may have that could impact their provision of legal services to the Commonwealth, and the Law Firm shall furnish to the Issuing Office all requested information and data. The Issuing Office reserves the right to reject any proposal if the evidence submitted by, or investigation of, such Law Firm fails to satisfy the Issuing Office that such Law Firm is properly qualified to carry out the obligations of the RFP and to complete the Engagement as specified.

II-1. Technical Submittal. Using the task descriptions in Part IV of this RFP and Appendix D, Statement of Qualifications/Conflicts/Technical Questionnaire, as your reference point, explain the Law Firm’s experience, including experience of the personnel that will perform the work, and the service you will provide under this Engagement. Complete and submit Appendix D, Statement of Qualifications/Conflicts/Technical Questionnaire, Appendix E, Personnel Experience, and Appendix F, Project References, as part of your Technical Submittal. In addition, provide a narrative demonstrating the Law Firm’s knowledge of the engagement at issue as well as an analysis of the Law Firm’s plan of action consistent with the Part I, Section I-4 and Part IV of the RFP. The Technical Submittal shall be submitted as a separate attachment, separated from the Cost, SDB Participation Submittal and VBE Participation Submittal.

II-2. Standard Legal Services Contract Terms and Conditions.

By submitting a proposal, including the cost proposal, in response to this RFP, the Law Firm agrees that it accepts all of the terms and conditions of the legal services contract set out in Part V of the RFP. The Issuing Office will reject any proposal that is conditioned on the negotiation of the terms and conditions of the legal services contract set out in Part V of the RFP.

II-3. Small Diverse Business Participation Submittal.

The SDB Participation Submittal – Appendix G and associated required documentation shall be submitted in accordance with the Instructions for Completing SDB Participation Submittal and SDB Utilization Schedule and shall be submitted electronically in accordance with Part 1, Section I-12.

NOTE: Equal employment opportunity and contract compliance statements referring to company equal employment opportunity policies or past contract compliance practices do not constitute proof of SDB Status or entitle a Law Firm to receive credit towards the SDB participation goal.

II-4. Veteran Business Enterprise Participation Submittal.

The VBE Participation Submittal – Appendix H and associated required documentation shall be submitted in accordance with the Instructions for Completing VBE Participation Submittal and VBE Utilization Schedule and shall be submitted electronically in accordance with Part 1, Section I-12.

NOTE: Equal employment opportunity and contract compliance statements referring to company equal employment opportunity policies or past contract compliance practices do not constitute proof of VBE Status or entitle a Law Firm to receive credit towards the VBE participation goal.

II-5. Cost Submittal. The information requested in this Part II, Section 5 shall constitute the Cost Submittal. The Cost Submittal – Appendix B, shall be submitted as a separate attachment, separated from the Technical, SDB Participation and VBE Participation Submittals. Law Firms should not include any assumptions in their Cost Submittals. If the Law Firm includes assumptions in its Cost Submittal, the Issuing Office may reject the proposal. Law Firms should direct in writing to the Issuing Office pursuant to Part I, Section I-8, of this RFP any questions about whether a cost or other component is included or applies. All Law Firms will then have the benefit of the Issuing Office’s written answer so that all proposals are submitted on the same basis.

Law Firms may include alternate pricing proposals; however, only the information proposed in the Cost Submittal will be used to evaluate the Law Firm's cost proposal. List any discount in hourly billing rates the Law Firm is willing to offer under this proposal. There are many ways in which a firm can supply lower rates, including, but not limited to: standard hourly rates subject to an agreed upon ceiling rate, standard hourly rates less an agreed upon percentage, flat rate proposals, blended rate proposals or other billing methods. The Commonwealth reserves the right to negotiate with each selected Law Firm on the compensation structure of the contract.

The Commonwealth will pay reasonable, actual, ordinary, and necessary expenses for other specific materials required for and used solely in the fulfillment of the services as provided in the Standard Contract for Legal Services (Part V of the RFP). Provide information on how you propose to keep track of and charge for any expenses.

The Department will reimburse the selected Law Firm for work satisfactorily performed after execution of a written contract and the start of the contract term, in accordance with contract requirements, and only after the Issuing Office has received a signed Appointment letter back from the Law Firm. At that point the Law Firm will be paid for services rendered dating back to the date of the Appointment letter.

[The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank.]

PART III

CRITERIA FOR SELECTION

III-1. Mandatory Responsiveness Requirements. To be eligible for selection, a proposal must be:

A. Timely received from a Law Firm;

B. Properly signed by the Law Firm;

C. Contain an SDB Participation Submittal and additional required documentation, all completed in accordance with Sections II-3, Part III-1, and the Instructions for Completing the SDB Participation Submittal and SDB Utilization Schedule; OR a VBE Participation Submittal and additional required documentation, all completed in accordance with Sections II-4, Part III-1, and the Instructions for Completing the VBE Participation Submittal and VBE Utilization Schedule.

III-2. Technical Nonconforming Proposals. The three (3) Mandatory Responsiveness Requirements set forth in Section III-1 above (A-C) are the only RFP requirements that the Commonwealth will consider to be non-waivable. The Issuing Office reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to (1) waive any other technical or immaterial nonconformities in an Offeror’s proposal, (2) allow the Offeror to cure the nonconformity, or (3) consider the nonconformity in the scoring of the Offeror’s proposal.

III-3. Evaluation. The Issuing Office has selected a committee of qualified personnel to review and evaluate timely submitted proposals and to submit recommendations to the Contracting Officer. The Issuing Office, in conjunction with BDISBO when necessary, will evaluate the SDB Participation Submittal, VBE Participation Submittal, and additional required documentation to determine whether they have been completed in accordance with Part I-12 and in a manner that demonstrates the Law Firm is responsive and responsible.

III-4. Evaluation Criteria. The following criteria will be used in evaluating each proposal:

A. Technical: The Issuing Office has established the weight for the Technical criterion for this RFP as 75 % of the total points. Evaluation will be based upon the following, in equal order of importance:

i. Understanding the Problem

ii. Contractor Prior Experience

iii. Proposed Personnel Qualifications

iv. Soundness of Approach

Notwithstanding the number of hours provided for purposes of cost evaluation noted herein and in the cost submittal, as part of the Understanding the Problem and Soundness of Approach portions of its technical submission Firms must provide the anticipated number of hours Firms envision working on this engagement given the description of the scope of requested services in the Statement of Work.

As part of your technical submission, provide a narrative demonstrating the Law Firm’s knowledge of the engagement at issue as well as an analysis of the Law Firm’s plan of action consistent with the problem statement and the Statement of Work.

The final Technical scores are determined by giving the maximum number of technical points available to the proposal with the highest raw technical score. The remaining proposals are rated by applying the Technical Scoring Formula set forth at the following webpage:

RFP_SCORING_FORMULA (pa.gov)

B. Cost: The Issuing Office has established the weight for the Cost criterion for this RFP as 25% of the total points. Please follow the directions in the Cost submittal closely. The purpose of the Cost sheet is to determine an average hourly rate across all proposed positions for the engagement. The cost criterion is rated by giving the proposal with the lowest total cost the maximum number of Cost points available.  The remaining proposals are rated by applying the Cost Formula set forth at the following webpage:

RFP_SCORING_FORMULA (pa.gov)

Law Firms should be advised that based upon the formula set forth above, a Cost submittal that is more than double that of the lowest responsible Law Firm’s bid risks receiving zero (0) points for Cost.

III-5. Law Firm Responsibility. To be deemed responsible for purposes of this engagement, an Law Firm must submit a responsive proposal and possess the capability to fully perform the contract requirements in all respects and the integrity and reliability to assure good faith performance of the contract.

A. In order for a Law Firm to be considered responsible for this RFP and therefore eligible for award, the total score for the technical submittal of the Law Firm’s proposal must be greater than or equal to 75% of the available technical points. Should a Law Firm’s proposal not receive a score greater than or equal to 75% of the available technical points, the Law Firm will not be considered responsible solely for the purposes of this RFP, and as such, the Law Firm’s cost proposal will not be evaluated.

B. Further, the Issuing Office will award a contract only to a Law Firm determined to be

responsible in accordance with the most current version of Commonwealth

Management Directive 215.9, Contractor Responsibility Program.

III-6. Final Ranking and Award.

A. After any discussions conducted with responsible Law Firms, the Issuing Office will combine the evaluation committee’s final technical scores and the final cost scores in accordance with the relative weights assigned to these areas as set forth in this Part. The Issuing Office will rank responsible Law Firms according to the total overall score assigned to each, in descending order.

B. For purposes of this RFP, the Commonwealth will be making a limited multiple award. In the order of their respective final qualification ranking, the Commonwealth in its sole discretion will determine the number of Law Firms to be awarded a contract based on the number of responsive proposals received from responsible Law Firms meeting the technical scoring threshold and with which fair and reasonable compensation can be negotiated as provided below. The Commonwealth may select a contractor from the Law Firms awarded contracts when services are needed. The selected Law Firms will be required to furnish the services requested by the Commonwealth at the contracted compensation.

C. Pursuant to Section 518 of the Commonwealth Procurement Code, award will be made following negotiation of fair and reasonable compensation. Law Firms will be evaluated based upon the evaluation factors set forth in this RFP, and then qualitatively ranked. The Commonwealth may then select the top ranked Law Firms for negotiation. If terms cannot be agreed upon, the Commonwealth may then select the next best qualified Law Firm for negotiation. Award will be made to the responsible Law Firms determined to be the best qualified after fair and reasonable compensation has been negotiated.

The Issuing Office will select for negotiations the Law Firms with the highest overall score; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT AN LAW FIRM WILL NOT BE SELECTED FOR NEGOTIATION IF THAT LAW FIRM WHOSE PROPOSAL RECEIVED THE LOWEST TECHNICAL SCORE AND HAD THE LOWEST COST OF THE RESPONSIVE PROPOSALS RECEIVED FROM RESPONSIBLE LAW FIRMS. IN THE EVENT SUCH A PROPOSAL ACHIEVES THE HIGHEST OVERALL SCORE, THE ISSUING OFFICE RESERVES THE RIGHT TO ELIMINATE THAT LAW FIRM FROM CONSIDERATION AND NEGOTIATIONS SHALL BE CONDUCTED WITH THE LAW FIRM WITH THE NEXT HIGHEST OVERALL SCORE.

D. If compensation cannot be agreed upon with the best qualified responsible Law Firm, then negotiations will be formally terminated with the Law Firm. If proposals were submitted by one or more other responsible Law Firms, negotiations may be conducted with the other responsible Law Firm or Law Firms in the order of their respective qualification ranking. Contracts may be awarded to the responsible Law Firms than ranked as best qualified if the amount of compensation is determined to be fair and reasonable.

E. The Issuing Office has the discretion to reject all proposals or cancel the request for proposals, at any time prior to the time a contract is fully executed, when it is in the best interests of the Commonwealth. The reasons for the rejection or cancellation shall be made part of the contract file.

[The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank.]

PART IV

STATEMENT OF WORK

IV-1. Objectives.

General. The purpose of Part IV-1 is to provide an overview of the engagement envisioned as a result of this RFP. Interested Law Firms should use this Part in its technical proposal and in conjunction with the Technical Submission (Appendix D).

In accordance with Executive Order 2015-02, the Commonwealth seeks to procure, through a limited multiple award, Law Firms to provide litigation and other potentially emergent legal services on an ad hoc basis. Specifically, Executive Order 2015-2 provides that legal services or legal consultant contracts shall be awarded on a sole source basis only when it is clearly not feasible to utilize competitive bidding because of an urgency of need or other documented circumstances. Executive Order 2015-2 further provides that the Governor’s Office of General Counsel should develop a competitively bid list of pre-approved outside counsel for emergency situations.

At various times, the Commonwealth or one of its agencies has been required to take exigent legal action or defend itself against litigation. The Office of General Counsel has issued this RFP to select standing legal counsel(s) to aid in such emergent legal matters, as further outlined below.

The selected Law Firm(s) will file appropriate pleadings and documents to advance or defend the Commonwealth’s interests. The selected Law Firm(s) will be expected to carry the litigation through pleadings and discovery, the initial judicial proceedings until a final verdict or other disposition, and will be considered for handling any subsequent appeals.

The engagement may include other general legal work as designated by the Commonwealth, at the discretion of the General Counsel. The selected Law Firm may at any time be called upon to provide specific services to the Commonwealth based on specific need, capacity, qualification or such other circumstances as the Commonwealth shall determine. The Office of General Counsel is looking for geographic diversity across the Commonwealth in order to provide services expeditiously and economically regardless of the location of need. Nothing herein shall in any way limit the discretion of the Commonwealth or the General Counsel to make assignments to serve the needs of the Commonwealth as deemed appropriate.

The Commonwealth reserves the right to make assignments as it may deem necessary or desirable, in the judgment of the Commonwealth, for all aspects of, or roles within the scope of this RFP.

Specific. Awarded Law Firms must be willing to provide legal services to any of the agencies under the Governor’s jurisdiction and the jurisdiction of the Office of General Counsel, as outlined below. Interested Law Firms should demonstrate and articulate a thorough understanding of Commonwealth procedures, processes and directives, and the internal workings of the Commonwealth Executive Branch and the Governor’s Office of General Counsel. The Executive Agencies under the jurisdiction of the Governor and the Governor’s Office of General Counsel include, but are not limited to:

• Department of Aging

• Department of Agriculture

• Department of Banking and Securities

• Department of Community and Economic Development

• Department of Conservation and Natural Resources

• Department of Corrections

• Department of Drug and Alcohol Programs

• Department of Education

• Department of Environmental Protection

• Department of General Services

• Department of Health

• Department of Human Services

• Department of Labor and Industry

• Department of Military and Veterans Affairs

• Department of Revenue

• Department of State

• Department of Transportation

• Insurance Department

• Office of Administration

• Office of Inspector General

• Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency

• Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency

• Pennsylvania State Police

• Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education

• Pennsylvania Council on the Arts

• Pennsylvania Historical Museum Commission

Interested Law Firms should demonstrate and articulate a thorough understanding of court procedure, whether state or federal, and must be able to provide services in all Pennsylvania courts and tribunals of competent jurisdiction. This includes, but is not limited to, all Pennsylvania federal, state and county courts. Firms should demonstrate their knowledge of court practices rather than just stating that they have extensive experience. For example, instead of just listing admissions, firms should also list the number of cases tried or handled or provide a listing of cases handled by the specific counsel assigned to this engagement as well as legal issues surrounding such cases. Firms should also provide an explanation of their current capacity to fully handle such engagements in house including litigation support and any e-Discovery or other capabilities.

Interested Law Firms should demonstrate and articulate a thorough understanding of the types of actions that may arise from this engagement including, but not limited to, examples of experience and proposed approaches. Examples of the types of engagements envisioned as a result of this RFP include, but are in no way limited to:

...